Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Per-path lint levels in DisallowedPath #11307

Open
ojeda opened this issue Aug 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Per-path lint levels in DisallowedPath #11307

ojeda opened this issue Aug 8, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@ojeda
Copy link
Contributor

ojeda commented Aug 8, 2023 •
edited
Loading

DisallowedPath could gain support for different lint levels for particular paths.

The use case is that a project may want to warn, deny or forbid depending on the method/macro/type/name/... in particular. For instance, a project may want to deny a custom panicking macro and warn about some debugging macros. Assuming -Wdisallowed_macros, they could write:

disallowed-macros = [
    "x::dbg",
    { path = "x::panic", level = "deny" },
]

These could behave as their own lint for level purposes. However, someone may still want to be able to override them, e.g. to allow or deny all of them, or a few of them. Thus it may be nice to give the user the ability to do so with e.g. -Ddisallowed_macros=x::dbg_foo and -Ddisallowed_macros=* (all, i.e. including both the ones with an explicit level and those without it, since the usual -Ddisallowed_macros applies to the current ones, i.e. those without an explicit level).
This was referenced Aug 8, 2023
Open
Open
@Centri3
Copy link
Member

Centri3 commented Aug 9, 2023

rustc itself would probably need to support this. Otherwise we'd need multiple lints like disllowed_macros_deny, disallowed_macros_warn which is terrible and would make allowing it really annoying (changing the level would cause it to lint again), maybe we could make them a group? But then rustc would show disallowed_macros_deny everywhere in stderr...

If we do this, we should probably combine all of the disallowed_ into one lint so they are all improved by this.

ojeda added a commit to ojeda/linux that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2024
@ojeda
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
dee38ab 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda added a commit to ojeda/linux that referenced this issue Sep 4, 2024
@ojeda
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
8c61e34 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda added a commit to ojeda/linux that referenced this issue Sep 4, 2024
@ojeda
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
cbdd221 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda added a commit to ojeda/linux that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2024
@ojeda
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
e885f74 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda added a commit to Rust-for-Linux/linux that referenced this issue Oct 7, 2024
@ojeda
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
7b95f6d 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda added a commit to Rust-for-Linux/linux that referenced this issue Oct 7, 2024
@ojeda
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
8577c9d 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
alistair23 pushed a commit to alistair23/linux that referenced this issue Nov 11, 2024
@ojeda @alistair23
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
84e52a3 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
alistair23 pushed a commit to alistair23/linux that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2024
@ojeda @alistair23
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
345cdab 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
herrnst pushed a commit to herrnst/linux-asahi that referenced this issue Nov 21, 2024
@ojeda @herrnst
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
f2e04b2 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
herrnst pushed a commit to herrnst/linux-asahi that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2024
@ojeda @herrnst
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
c4f5f03 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
WhatAmISupposedToPutHere pushed a commit to WhatAmISupposedToPutHere/linux that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2024
@ojeda @jannau
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
d3fcdf9 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
herrnst pushed a commit to herrnst/linux-asahi that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2024
@ojeda @herrnst
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
1e82720 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
herrnst pushed a commit to herrnst/linux-asahi that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2024
@ojeda @herrnst
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
a713ca2 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
herrnst pushed a commit to herrnst/linux-asahi that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2024
@ojeda @herrnst
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
7dd1452 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
jannau pushed a commit to AsahiLinux/linux that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2024
@ojeda @jannau
rust: replace clippy::dbg_macro with disallowed_macros
43204b7 
Back when we used Rust 1.60.0 (before Rust was merged in the kernel),
we added `-Wclippy::dbg_macro` to the compilation flags. This worked
great with our custom `dbg!` macro (vendored from `std`, but slightly
modified to use the kernel printing facilities).

However, in the very next version, 1.61.0, it stopped working [1] since
the lint started to use a Rust diagnostic item rather than a path to find
the `dbg!` macro [1]. This behavior remains until the current nightly
(1.83.0).

Therefore, currently, the `dbg_macro` is not doing anything, which
explains why we can invoke `dbg!` in samples/rust/rust_print.rs`, as well
as why changing the `#[allow()]`s to `#[expect()]`s in `std_vendor.rs`
doctests does not work since they are not fulfilled.

One possible workaround is using `rustc_attrs` like the standard library
does. However, this is intended to be internal, and we just started
supporting several Rust compiler versions, so it is best to avoid it.

Therefore, instead, use `disallowed_macros`. It is a stable lint and
is more flexible (in that we can provide different macros), although
its diagnostic message(s) are not as nice as the specialized one (yet),
and does not allow to set different lint levels per macro/path [2].

In turn, this requires allowing the (intentional) `dbg!` use in the
sample, as one would have expected.

Finally, in a single case, the `allow` is fixed to be an inner attribute,
since otherwise it was not being applied.

Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303 [1]
Link: rust-lang/rust-clippy#11307 [2]
Tested-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ojeda @Centri3