Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate dbg_macro to late pass #8411

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2022
Merged

Migrate dbg_macro to late pass #8411

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2022

Conversation

Alexendoo
Copy link
Member

changelog: Make dbg_macro work with crate level attributes and inside macro calls

One down for #6610, fixes #7275

Also fixes #7274, and adds parenthesis around the suggestion for dbg!(1, 2, 3) as it expands to a tuple

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @Manishearth

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Feb 11, 2022
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

Awesome, thank you! 2 pre-expansion passes to go 🎉

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2022

📌 Commit 41d7c7e has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 41d7c7e with merge 96c73c5...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 96c73c5 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 96c73c5 into rust-lang:master Feb 11, 2022
@Alexendoo Alexendoo deleted the dbg_macro branch February 11, 2022 17:52
@smoelius
Copy link
Contributor

@flip1995

Awesome, thank you! 2 pre-expansion passes to go tada

Is there an effort to eliminate pre-expansion pass lints? Can I ask why?

@giraffate
Copy link
Contributor

Is there an effort to eliminate pre-expansion pass lints? Can I ask why?

FYI: #5518

@smoelius
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, @giraffate. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

dbg_macro not caught when in submodule dbg_macro does not catch invocation inside macro
7 participants