-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update startup_WBC.m and startup_robotology_superbuild.m #75
Comments
I would like to have the possibility to independently configure WBC without the superbuild, while on the other hand we need to simplify the installation procedure in case the repo comes along with the
Menawhile, we also leave the startup_WBC.m file in this repo, and in the README will be documented to use it only when the repo is not installed through the robotology-superbuild. |
To comply with the workflow of the Documentation has also to be updated accordingly. |
No, actually I think the current pipeline is better for handling also the installation of the |
PR open: robotology/robotology-superbuild#367 |
Note that you can also think of installing the |
I was going towards this direction (see the outdated comment #75 (comment)) because I don't like the fact that the library is not installed, however then I have no clue how to handle the That script should point the absolute path of the
I still need to somehow get the path to whole-body-controllers source folder inside the |
I've decided:
|
With ac4a437 the |
I understood that adding the
wbc
library using the startup file is not really straightforward, even if it is documented. In particular, it is not a straightforward procedure for who installed this repo through therobotology-superbuild
, that is the majority of the users. Maybe we can find alternatives for adding thewbc
folder to the matlab path.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: