Skip to content

Conversation

@JakeSCahill
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This pull request updates the HTTP Proxy documentation to improve clarity and tailor content for different deployment environments. The main changes reorganize and conditionally display authentication details based on whether the documentation is being built for a cloud environment.

Documentation improvements:

  • Clarified the explanation of how authentication methods are determined, and made the reference to the authentication_method broker property conditional so it only appears in non-cloud builds.
  • Made the reference to OIDC authentication configuration details conditional, so it is only included in non-cloud builds.

Page previews

Checks

  • New feature
  • Content gap
  • Support Follow-up
  • Small fix (typos, links, copyedits, etc)

@JakeSCahill JakeSCahill requested a review from a team as a code owner August 15, 2025 08:49
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 15, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Introduces environment-conditional documentation in modules/develop/partials/http-proxy.adoc. The broker property http_proxy_auth_method is now shown only for non-cloud builds using ifndef::env-cloud[], while the cluster property http_authentication remains visible. Adds non-cloud-only cross-references directing readers to OIDC authentication docs. Similar OIDC cross-reference notes are inserted near the OIDC Authentication and Swagger sections to reflect cloud vs. non-cloud behavior consistently.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • weeco
  • micheleRP
  • BenPope
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch JakeSCahill-patch-5

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 15, 2025

Deploy Preview for redpanda-docs-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 03431bb
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/redpanda-docs-preview/deploys/689f659ed9ec4f000893b135
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1315--redpanda-docs-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
modules/develop/partials/http-proxy.adoc (1)

951-953: Good conditional xref; consider adding a Cloud-specific pointer (optional) and verify anchor

Hiding the OIDC configuration details for Cloud builds is appropriate. Optionally, add an ifdef::env-cloud[] note pointing Cloud readers to any Cloud-specific auth docs, if available. Also, please verify the oidc-http anchor exists.

Use the same script in my other comment to validate the oidc-http anchor presence. If there’s a Cloud doc to reference, I can help add a conditional xref.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 722b308 and 7a9efd0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • modules/develop/partials/http-proxy.adoc (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
modules/develop/partials/http-proxy.adoc (1)

856-862: No change needed — anchors present and link text follows repository convention

Both anchors exist and the visible link text is consistent with how the property is referenced elsewhere, so no change is necessary.

  • Current location: modules/develop/partials/http-proxy.adoc (lines ~859–861) — xref to broker http_proxy_auth_method and cluster http_authentication.
  • Broker anchor: modules/reference/pages/properties/broker-properties.adoc — [[http_proxy_auth_method]] (used as <<http_proxy_auth_method, authentication_method>>).
  • Cluster anchor: modules/reference/pages/properties/cluster-properties.adoc — === http_authentication (anchor present).
  • OIDC anchor: modules/manage/partials/authentication.adoc — [[oidc-http]] (OIDC Authentication section).

Do not apply the proposed diff; keep the existing link text for consistency across the docs.

@JakeSCahill JakeSCahill changed the title Conditionalize links to Self-Managed topics http-proxy: Conditionalize links to Self-Managed topics Aug 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Feediver1 Feediver1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@JakeSCahill JakeSCahill merged commit a0aaf83 into main Aug 15, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@JakeSCahill JakeSCahill deleted the JakeSCahill-patch-5 branch August 15, 2025 16:52
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2025
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants