-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Issues: pfmc-assessments/pacfintools
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
getComps compatibility with nwfsc-assess/nwfscSurvey
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: help wanted
Help is needed
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
skate length conversion
priority: low
The lowest level priority, i.e., not urgent.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
composition of sablefish samples in OR
priority: low
The lowest level priority, i.e., not urgent.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: documentation
Related to documentation of code, methods, etc.
type: enhancement
condition species
priority: low
The lowest level priority, i.e., not urgent.
status: help wanted
Help is needed
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
fish_length_type == "F" NA fish_fork_length
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: database
Related to information in or access to the PacFIN database, stuff outside of our control
type: bug
Match CalCOM sampling and code for expansions
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
unsexed fish in sample weight
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
FISH_LENGTH_TYPE methods
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: bug
ExpansionFactor_1 Numerator best practices are maybe not the best
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
PSMFC_CATCH_AREA_CODE 9U
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
move files from hake-data
priority: low
The lowest level priority, i.e., not urgent.
status: in progress
Currently working on this issue
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: refactor
Changes to the codebase or documentation that do NOT alter the values returned, e.g., styling.
input sample size
priority: low
The lowest level priority, i.e., not urgent.
status: long term
A long-term problem that could potentially be a change needed in PacFIN.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
Remove Puget Sound data
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: in progress
Currently working on this issue
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: refactor
Changes to the codebase or documentation that do NOT alter the values returned, e.g., styling.
Amount of catch missing from WA State's PSMFC areas varies by species & year
priority: low
The lowest level priority, i.e., not urgent.
status: wontfix
An issue that will not be addressed within this package
topic: database
Related to information in or access to the PacFIN database, stuff outside of our control
type: no action
No action or changes to the code/documentation were needed.
Develop smarter way to check Oregon number of sex samples by sample number
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: bug
INPFC area is no longer available in the bds data
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: bug
Check for OR SP samples
priority: low
The lowest level priority, i.e., not urgent.
status: help wanted
Help is needed
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
topic: database
Related to information in or access to the PacFIN database, stuff outside of our control
type: refactor
Changes to the codebase or documentation that do NOT alter the values returned, e.g., styling.
Add flag for years with large proportions of unsexed fish
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: in progress
Currently working on this issue
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
Cluster for states and what that means when sampling
priority: low
The lowest level priority, i.e., not urgent.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
Nominal catches and unidentified species
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: bug
Best way to split data at 40 10' management line
priority: low
The lowest level priority, i.e., not urgent.
status: help wanted
Help is needed
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
add diagnostics related to trips without trip weights and expanded sample sizes
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: help wanted
Help is needed
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
Special Project Data for Washington
priority: high
The highest priority level in terms of what needs to be done.
status: help wanted
Help is needed
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: bug
Gear grouping standards
priority: low
The lowest level priority, i.e., not urgent.
status: in progress
Currently working on this issue
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
topic: documentation
Related to documentation of code, methods, etc.
type: enhancement
PSMFC_AREA is basically a copy of PSMFC_ARID
priority: low
The lowest level priority, i.e., not urgent.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
Previous Next
ProTip!
Exclude everything labeled
bug
with -label:bug.