Skip to content

Fix penpal runtime & enable zombienet tests again.#10667

Closed
eskimor wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
rk-fix-penpal
Closed

Fix penpal runtime & enable zombienet tests again.#10667
eskimor wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
rk-fix-penpal

Conversation

@eskimor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@eskimor eskimor commented Dec 16, 2025

Fix issues with penpal runtime.

@eskimor eskimor requested review from a team as code owners December 16, 2025 15:49
Comment on lines +87 to +89
// Don't pre-fund accounts with non-sufficient assets at genesis
// They can be minted later if needed
accounts: vec![]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are making a similar fix in zombienet (paritytech/zombienet-sdk#481), but I think this is more accurate since the zombienet should only modify the needed keys to spawn the network.

cc: @mchristou

zombienet-polkadot-elastic-scaling-doesnt-break-parachains:10653
zombienet-polkadot-smoke-0005-precompile-pvf-smoke:10653
zombienet-polkadot-smoke-0004-coretime-smoke-test:10653
zombienet-polkadot-smoke-0002-parachains-parachains-upgrade-smoke:10653
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eskimor / @sandreim, can we remove this test according to this comment #10654 (comment)
wdyt?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sgtm

zombienet-polkadot-functional-0014-chunk-fetching-network-compatibility:9980
# disabled until zombienet support penpal (https://github.com/paritytech/zombienet-sdk/issues/480)
zombienet-polkadot-shared-core-idle-parachain:10653
zombienet-polkadot-functional-async-backing-6-seconds-rate:10653
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eskimor / @sandreim, can we remove this test according to #10654 (comment)

wdyt?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

async backing should be fine to remove, but not so sure about core sharing.

@eskimor eskimor added the R0-no-crate-publish-required The change does not require any crates to be re-published. label Dec 16, 2025
@eskimor eskimor closed this Dec 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

R0-no-crate-publish-required The change does not require any crates to be re-published.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants