Skip to content

Comments

refactor(formatter): remove format_only_if_breaks and FormatOnlyIfBreaks#16478

Merged
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
12-04-refactor_formatter_remove_format_only_if_breaks_and_formatonlyifbreaks
Dec 4, 2025
Merged

refactor(formatter): remove format_only_if_breaks and FormatOnlyIfBreaks#16478
graphite-app[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
12-04-refactor_formatter_remove_format_only_if_breaks_and_formatonlyifbreaks

Conversation

@Dunqing
Copy link
Member

@Dunqing Dunqing commented Dec 4, 2025

No usages. This method seems to work with Biome's token, but we don't have the token.

Copy link
Member Author

Dunqing commented Dec 4, 2025


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 4, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #16478 will not alter performance

Comparing 12-04-refactor_formatter_remove_format_only_if_breaks_and_formatonlyifbreaks (8c93b42) with 12-04-refactor_formatter_remove_buffersnapshot (f67fddb)

Summary

✅ 38 untouched
⏩ 7 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 7 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Dec 4, 2025
@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Merge activity

…aks (#16478)

No usages. This method seems to work with Biome's token, but we don't have the token.
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 12-04-refactor_formatter_remove_buffersnapshot branch from f67fddb to 1042773 Compare December 4, 2025 07:33
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 12-04-refactor_formatter_remove_format_only_if_breaks_and_formatonlyifbreaks branch from 8c93b42 to f3fa778 Compare December 4, 2025 07:34
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Dec 4, 2025
Base automatically changed from 12-04-refactor_formatter_remove_buffersnapshot to main December 4, 2025 07:42
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit f3fa778 into main Dec 4, 2025
21 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 12-04-refactor_formatter_remove_format_only_if_breaks_and_formatonlyifbreaks branch December 4, 2025 07:42
taearls pushed a commit to taearls/oxc that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2025
…aks (oxc-project#16478)

No usages. This method seems to work with Biome's token, but we don't have the token.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-formatter Area - Formatter C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants