refactor(ast): add AstKind for TSFunctionType

[camc314]

No description provided.

[camc314]

• test(semantic): add failing tests for arguments and eval use in strict mode #12298
• fix(semantic): allow arguments/eval as name of TSTypeAliasDeclaration, TSInterfaceDeclaration #12291
• fix(semantic): allow arguments/eval as spread argument name inside TSMethodSignature, TSFunctionType #12290
• fix(semantic): allow arguments/eval as argument name inside TSMethodSignature #12289
• fix(semantic): allow arguments/eval as argument name inside TSFunctionType #12288
• refactor(ast): add AstKind for TSFunctionType #12287 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

---

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

• 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
• hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #12287 will not alter performance

_{Comparing c/07-15-refactor_ast_remove_astkind_for_tsfunctiontype_ (c025868) with main (633ba30)}

Summary

✅ 34 untouched benchmarks

[camc314]

Merge activity

• Jul 15, 12:27 PM UTC: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
• Jul 15, 12:27 PM UTC: camc314 added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Jul 15, 12:36 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue.

[Dunqing]

The PR title confused me, I thought that you were removing AstKind::TSFunctionType

[camc314]

oops, i've been in the habit so much of the ast kind being removed, i didn't realize i had actually added it