Skip to content

config: Add an rpm-ostree prow job#5263

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
cgwalters:hookup-coreos-rpm-ostree-prowjob
Oct 3, 2019
Merged

config: Add an rpm-ostree prow job#5263
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
cgwalters:hookup-coreos-rpm-ostree-prowjob

Conversation

@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

So we get "it builds and runs" sanity checking.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 2, 2019
@cgwalters cgwalters force-pushed the hookup-coreos-rpm-ostree-prowjob branch 2 times, most recently from 2634070 to e67360b Compare October 2, 2019 18:25
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 2, 2019
@cgwalters cgwalters force-pushed the hookup-coreos-rpm-ostree-prowjob branch from e67360b to 10e0a6d Compare October 2, 2019 18:30
@cgwalters cgwalters mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2019
7 tasks
@cgwalters cgwalters force-pushed the hookup-coreos-rpm-ostree-prowjob branch 2 times, most recently from 2a15f3a to 780ad53 Compare October 2, 2019 20:04
@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Hm, I don't understand these failures. This looks like fallout from ef3cd1d

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vrutkovs commented Oct 3, 2019

/retest

1 similar comment
@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/retest

@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/test ci/prow/pj-rehearse

@cgwalters cgwalters closed this Oct 3, 2019
@cgwalters cgwalters reopened this Oct 3, 2019
@cgwalters cgwalters force-pushed the hookup-coreos-rpm-ostree-prowjob branch from 780ad53 to 3c643b6 Compare October 3, 2019 13:14
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These need reviewers so that we could LGTM PRs here

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approvers get used when no reviewers get listed

@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Hooray, this works now!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These need reviewers so that we could LGTM PRs here

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aren't approvers also reviewers?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, it seems it works like this too

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you /lgtm this?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jlebon jlebon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 3, 2019
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vrutkovs vrutkovs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

So we get "it builds and runs" sanity checking.
@cgwalters cgwalters force-pushed the hookup-coreos-rpm-ostree-prowjob branch from 3c643b6 to 1611546 Compare October 3, 2019 15:07
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 3, 2019
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@petr-muller petr-muller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 3, 2019
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@stevekuznetsov stevekuznetsov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approvers get used when no reviewers get listed

resources:
'*':
limits:
memory: 6Gi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a lot of memory for your sanity test :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm yeah, the build process (gcc and Rust compilers) is what uses RAM; could dial that back down some.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ultimately I think what we really want is to

  1. Attribute resource usage to repositories and organizations and keep it sane
  2. https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/tree/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, jlebon, petr-muller, stevekuznetsov, vrutkovs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 91a96f9 into openshift:master Oct 3, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cgwalters: Updated the following 3 configmaps:

  • ci-operator-master-configs configmap in namespace ci-stg using the following files:
    • key coreos-rpm-ostree-master.yaml using file ci-operator/config/coreos/rpm-ostree/coreos-rpm-ostree-master.yaml
  • job-config-master configmap in namespace ci using the following files:
    • key coreos-rpm-ostree-master-presubmits.yaml using file ci-operator/jobs/coreos/rpm-ostree/coreos-rpm-ostree-master-presubmits.yaml
  • ci-operator-master-configs configmap in namespace ci using the following files:
    • key coreos-rpm-ostree-master.yaml using file ci-operator/config/coreos/rpm-ostree/coreos-rpm-ostree-master.yaml
Details

In response to this:

So we get "it builds and runs" sanity checking.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants