Skip to content

Conversation

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

  • templates/installer/e2e-metal: fix bootstrap_ip retrieval

without the state file, terraform fails with error
`The module root could not be found. There is nothing to output.

*templates/installer/e2e-metal: use the rhcos.json from upi-installer image to pick bootimage

upi-installer image now includes the static rhcos.json 1, such that we that pickup the required bootimage
asset location directly from it.

/cc @wking

without the state file, terraform fails with error
`The module root could not be found. There is nothing to output.`
…image to pick bootimage

upi-installer image now includes the static rhcos.json [1], such that we that pickup the required bootimage
asset location directly from it.

[1]: openshift/installer#1673
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Apr 26, 2019
@abhinavdahiya abhinavdahiya changed the title templates/installer/e2e-metal :use the rhcos.json from upi-installer image and fix bootstrap_ip retrieval templates/installer/e2e-metal: use the rhcos.json from upi-installer image and fix bootstrap_ip retrieval Apr 26, 2019
@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pj-rehearse

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Apr 29, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 29, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 7e9ec13 into openshift:master Apr 29, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@abhinavdahiya: Updated the following 2 configmaps:

  • prow-job-cluster-launch-installer-metal-e2e configmap in namespace ci using the following files:
    • key cluster-launch-installer-metal-e2e.yaml using file ci-operator/templates/openshift/installer/cluster-launch-installer-metal-e2e.yaml
  • prow-job-cluster-launch-installer-metal-e2e configmap in namespace ci-stg using the following files:
    • key cluster-launch-installer-metal-e2e.yaml using file ci-operator/templates/openshift/installer/cluster-launch-installer-metal-e2e.yaml
Details

In response to this:

  • templates/installer/e2e-metal: fix bootstrap_ip retrieval

without the state file, terraform fails with error
`The module root could not be found. There is nothing to output.

*templates/installer/e2e-metal: use the rhcos.json from upi-installer image to pick bootimage

upi-installer image now includes the static rhcos.json 1, such that we that pickup the required bootimage
asset location directly from it.

/cc @wking

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

wking added a commit to wking/openshift-release that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2019
…1.201911221453.0

Catching up with openshift/installer@a8e9991876 (rhcos: Bump to
43.81.201911221453.0, 2019-11-22, openshift/installer#2714) and its
encryption fixes.

Unfortunately we still don't have a way to expose the installer's
recommended default, and I'm still opposed to reaching into the
installer sources and looking in its internal rhcos.json like
c85599a (templates/installer/e2e-metal: use the rhcos.json from
upi-installer image to pick bootimage, 2019-04-26, openshift#3612) is doing for
metal, because that's not what our users will be doing.  Using the
installer's tip AMI defaults is also not what users will be doing, but
I'm not clear on how we can select the right branch in the templates
to pull from the openshift-docs defaults [1,2,3] (which is what users
will be doing).

[1]: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.1/installing/installing_aws_user_infra/installing-aws-user-infra.html#installation-aws-user-infra-rhcos-ami_installing-aws-user-infra
[2]: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.2/installing/installing_aws_user_infra/installing-aws-user-infra.html#installation-aws-user-infra-rhcos-ami_installing-aws-user-infra
[3]: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/blob/b24fe4684f8f6ba11cae92c5a779abbe4af57717/modules/installation-aws-user-infra-rhcos-ami.adoc#op-system-amis-for-the-aws-infrastructure
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants