Bug 1775728: rhcos: Bump to 43.81.201911221453.0 #2714

cgwalters · 2019-11-22T20:39:51Z

This has fixes for encryption, see e.g.:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775728

This has fixes for encryption, see e.g.: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775728 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775388

sdodson · 2019-11-24T15:53:05Z

/test e2e-metal
It will likely fail due to other problems but I'm curious.

sdodson · 2019-11-24T15:53:27Z

/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-azure

cgwalters · 2019-11-25T13:54:07Z

Leasing
/test e2e-gcp

Some sort of networking issue, probably real but not likely related to this
/test e2e-azure

jcpowermac · 2019-11-25T14:07:18Z

/test e2e-vsphere

jcpowermac · 2019-11-25T16:57:45Z

vSphere is failing on the usual tests. The install completed bootstrap and cluster complete. lgtm

cgwalters · 2019-11-25T18:22:52Z

/test e2e-azure

cgwalters · 2019-11-25T20:34:55Z

/test e2e-azure

cgwalters · 2019-11-25T22:03:11Z

Looks like a transient Prow issue
/test e2e-azure

stbenjam · 2019-11-26T01:30:03Z

/label platform/baremetal

Is this working?

Edit: No, it's not. I kicked off baremetal manually

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-26T01:30:04Z

@stbenjam: The label(s) /label platform/baremetal cannot be applied. These labels are supported: platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga

Details

In response to this:

/label platform/baremetal

Is this working?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-26T01:35:11Z

@stbenjam: The label(s) /label platform/baremetal cannot be applied. These labels are supported: platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga

Details

In response to this:

/label platform/baremetal

Is this working?

Edit: No, it's not. I kicked off [baremetal manually](http://10.8.144.11:8080/job/dev-tools/1332.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-26T01:35:17Z

@stbenjam: The label(s) /label platform/baremetal cannot be applied. These labels are supported: platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga

Details

In response to this:

/label platform/baremetal

Is this working?

Edit: No, it's not. I kicked off baremetal manually

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

metal3ci · 2019-11-26T02:36:45Z

Build FAILURE, see build http://10.8.144.11:8080/job/dev-tools/1332/

cgwalters · 2019-11-26T13:47:15Z

/test e2e-azure

patrickdillon · 2019-11-26T15:58:16Z

Seeing

[systemd]
Failed Units: 1
  multipathd.service

in GCP. Seems like this should help that as well...

cgwalters · 2019-11-26T18:31:32Z

Horray, have a ✔️ e2e-azure. Let's get this in?

abhinavdahiya · 2019-11-26T19:14:13Z

/retest

does it solve the metal failures?

cgwalters · 2019-11-26T19:15:58Z

does it solve the metal failures?

No, because at least the machines we're getting from Packet.net only have a TPM1.2 - and we don't make it easy to disable the encryption requirement on the bootstrap. See openshift/enhancements#98
(There are other packet issues being worked through in #2695 )

abhinavdahiya · 2019-11-26T19:21:35Z

No, because at least the machines we're getting from Packet.net only have a TPM1.2 -

but the PR description says that it's fixing that bug...? Can we remove that if that's not the case.

/cc @wking
we might have to bump the AMI for upi tests

cgwalters · 2019-11-26T19:27:24Z

but the PR description says that it's fixing that bug...? Can we remove that if that's not the case.

Sure, done.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-26T19:29:58Z

@cgwalters: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1775728, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.3.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1775728: rhcos: Bump to 43.81.201911221453.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

abhinavdahiya · 2019-11-26T19:32:06Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-bot · 2019-11-26T21:35:34Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-26T21:48:58Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

cgwalters · 2019-11-26T21:56:31Z

Known busted
/override e2e-metal
/override e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7
Known to have some failing tests
/override e2e-vsphere

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-26T21:56:46Z

@cgwalters: cgwalters unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file.

Details

In response to this:

Known busted
/override e2e-metal
/override e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7
Known to have some failing tests
/override e2e-vsphere

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-26T22:01:39Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-26T22:14:36Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-26T22:40:26Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-26T22:53:31Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-26T23:06:22Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-26T23:19:20Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-26T23:58:19Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-27T00:11:20Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-27T00:50:19Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-27T01:03:20Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-27T01:16:22Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-27T01:55:20Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-27T02:08:19Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-27T02:21:19Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-27T02:34:17Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-27T03:19:33Z

@cgwalters: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1775728 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1775728: rhcos: Bump to 43.81.201911221453.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2019-11-27T03:19:43Z

@abhinavdahiya: new pull request created: #2724

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-27T04:54:11Z

@cgwalters: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal	`a8e9991`	link	`/test e2e-metal`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7	`a8e9991`	link	`/test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7`
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere	`a8e9991`	link	`/test e2e-vsphere`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

…1.201911221453.0 Catching up with openshift/installer@a8e9991876 (rhcos: Bump to 43.81.201911221453.0, 2019-11-22, openshift/installer#2714) and its encryption fixes. Unfortunately we still don't have a way to expose the installer's recommended default, and I'm still opposed to reaching into the installer sources and looking in its internal rhcos.json like c85599a (templates/installer/e2e-metal: use the rhcos.json from upi-installer image to pick bootimage, 2019-04-26, openshift#3612) is doing for metal, because that's not what our users will be doing. Using the installer's tip AMI defaults is also not what users will be doing, but I'm not clear on how we can select the right branch in the templates to pull from the openshift-docs defaults [1,2,3] (which is what users will be doing). [1]: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.1/installing/installing_aws_user_infra/installing-aws-user-infra.html#installation-aws-user-infra-rhcos-ami_installing-aws-user-infra [2]: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.2/installing/installing_aws_user_infra/installing-aws-user-infra.html#installation-aws-user-infra-rhcos-ami_installing-aws-user-infra [3]: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/blob/b24fe4684f8f6ba11cae92c5a779abbe4af57717/modules/installation-aws-user-infra-rhcos-ami.adoc#op-system-amis-for-the-aws-infrastructure

rhcos: Bump to 43.81.201911221453.0

a8e9991

This has fixes for encryption, see e.g.: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775728 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775388

openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 22, 2019

openshift-ci-robot requested review from mtnbikenc and patrickdillon November 22, 2019 20:40

sdodson mentioned this pull request Nov 24, 2019

upi/metal various fixes #2695

Closed

2 tasks

openshift-ci-robot requested a review from wking November 26, 2019 19:21

abhinavdahiya changed the title ~~rhcos: Bump to 43.81.201911221453.0~~ Bug 1775728: rhcos: Bump to 43.81.201911221453.0 Nov 26, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 26, 2019

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 254319c into openshift:master Nov 27, 2019

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2019

Bug 1777036: rhcos: Bump to 43.81.201911221453.0 #2724

Merged

wking mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2019

ci-operator/templates/openshift/installer: Bump AWS UPI to RHCOS 43.81.201911221453.0 openshift/release#6192

Merged

wking mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2019

modules/installation-aws-user-infra-rhcos-ami: Bump to RHCOS 44.81.202001030903.0 openshift/openshift-docs#18395

Merged

wking mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2019

data/rhcos: Roll back to 43.81.201911081536.0 #2797

Closed

Bug 1775728: rhcos: Bump to 43.81.201911221453.0 #2714

Bug 1775728: rhcos: Bump to 43.81.201911221453.0 #2714

Uh oh!

Conversation

cgwalters commented Nov 22, 2019 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Nov 24, 2019

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Nov 24, 2019

Uh oh!

cgwalters commented Nov 25, 2019

Uh oh!

jcpowermac commented Nov 25, 2019

Uh oh!

jcpowermac commented Nov 25, 2019

Uh oh!

cgwalters commented Nov 25, 2019

Uh oh!

cgwalters commented Nov 25, 2019

Uh oh!

cgwalters commented Nov 25, 2019

Uh oh!

stbenjam commented Nov 26, 2019 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

metal3ci commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

cgwalters commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

patrickdillon commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

cgwalters commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

abhinavdahiya commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

cgwalters commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

abhinavdahiya commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

cgwalters commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

abhinavdahiya commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

cgwalters commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 26, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 27, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 27, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 27, 2019

Uh oh!

cgwalters commented Nov 22, 2019 •

edited

Loading

stbenjam commented Nov 26, 2019 •

edited

Loading