Skip to content

Comments

OCPBUGS-76277, CORENET-6055: [release-4.16] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP#2972

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.16from
igsilya:ovn-unpin-4.16
Feb 8, 2026
Merged

OCPBUGS-76277, CORENET-6055: [release-4.16] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP#2972
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.16from
igsilya:ovn-unpin-4.16

Conversation

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor

@igsilya igsilya commented Feb 5, 2026

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.17: #2959

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins.
This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and
especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging
this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug
fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can
take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it
automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it.  There is
a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that
ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released
through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are
not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need
them different at some point in time.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 5, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.17: #2959

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 5, 2026

/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-74492

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 5, 2026

@igsilya: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle OCPBUGS-76277: CORENET-6055: [release-4.16] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP

Details

In response to this:

/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-74492

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title CORENET-6055: [release-4.16] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP OCPBUGS-76277: CORENET-6055: [release-4.16] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP Feb 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.17: #2959

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ricky-rav and tssurya February 5, 2026 16:44
@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 5, 2026

/retitle OCPBUGS-76277, CORENET-6055: [release-4.16] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title OCPBUGS-76277: CORENET-6055: [release-4.16] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP OCPBUGS-76277, CORENET-6055: [release-4.16] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP Feb 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 5, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.17: #2959

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 5, 2026

Some GCP install failure, upgrade disruption also looks strange, let's try again.
/retest-required

@ricky-rav
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 6, 2026

The serial test didn't pass since mid December, the upgrade one also not particularly stable..
/jira refresh
/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 6, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492 targets the "4.17.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.17.0, 4.17.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

The serial test didn't pass since mid December, the upgrade one also not particularly stable..
/jira refresh
/retest-required

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 7, 2026

Storage tests in e2e-aws-ovn-serial seem broen and they didn't pass since mid December. Will probably need an override.

The upgrade test is very flaky. Got a different failure this time.
/test 4.16-upgrade-from-stable-4.15-local-gateway-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2026

@igsilya: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security 2583473 link false /test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Contributor

@ricky-rav ricky-rav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label backport-risk-assessed
/lgtm
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial
/verified by ci
/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 8, 2026

@ricky-rav: The label(s) /label backport-risk-assessed, cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, jira/valid-bug, ok-to-test, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

Details

In response to this:

/label backport-risk-assessed,
/lgtm
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial
/verified by ci
/approve

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 8, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 8, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: igsilya, ricky-rav

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 8, 2026

@ricky-rav: Overrode contexts on behalf of ricky-rav: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial

Details

In response to this:

/label backport-risk-assessed,
/lgtm
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial
/verified by ci
/approve

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 8, 2026
@ricky-rav
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Feb 8, 2026
@ricky-rav
Copy link
Contributor

/verified by ci

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 8, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ricky-rav: This PR has been marked as verified by ci.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by ci

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 87e9070 into openshift:release-4.16 Feb 8, 2026
25 of 26 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@igsilya: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.17: #2959

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 9, 2026

/cherrypick release-4.15

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@igsilya: #2972 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.15":

Applying: Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	Dockerfile.base
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging Dockerfile.base
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in Dockerfile.base
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP.

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.16.0-0.nightly-2026-02-10-220409

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.