OCPBUGS-74492, CORENET-6055: [release-4.17] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP#2959
Conversation
OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months. Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP. Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time. Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org> (cherry picked from commit 3771a89)
|
@igsilya: This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.z" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-66428 |
|
@igsilya: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66428 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492. Will retitle bug to link to clone. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.z" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.z" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Half the jobs failed to fetch existing microshift image for some reason. |
|
Timed out installing unrelated RPMs... |
|
GCP infra provisioning issues, windows didn't pass for a very long time. |
|
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview |
|
@igsilya: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Let's try one more time. For some reason the node rediness checks expects 6 nodes, but there are only 5... |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
|
@ricky-rav: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: igsilya, ricky-rav The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@ricky-rav: Overrode contexts on behalf of ricky-rav: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed label |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
f1ca69a
into
openshift:release-4.17
|
@igsilya: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/cherrypick release-4.16 |
|
@igsilya: #2959 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.16": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Fix included in accepted release 4.17.0-0.nightly-2026-02-06-091352 |
OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.
Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.
Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.
OVN-Kubernetes is currently using the latest OVN builds already, so this PR doesn't actually change anything for the current images. But it will bring newer OVN builds automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.
(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)
Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.18: #2895