Skip to content

Comments

OCPBUGS-74492, CORENET-6055: [release-4.17] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP#2959

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.17from
igsilya:ovn-unpin-4.17
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

OCPBUGS-74492, CORENET-6055: [release-4.17] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP#2959
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.17from
igsilya:ovn-unpin-4.17

Conversation

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor

@igsilya igsilya commented Jan 27, 2026

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

OVN-Kubernetes is currently using the latest OVN builds already, so this PR doesn't actually change anything for the current images. But it will bring newer OVN builds automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.18: #2895

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins.
This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and
especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging
this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug
fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can
take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it
automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it.  There is
a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that
ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released
through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are
not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need
them different at some point in time.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 27, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 27, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

OVN-Kubernetes is currently using the latest OVN builds already, so this PR doesn't actually change anything for the current images. But it will bring newer OVN builds automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.18: #2895

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Jan 27, 2026

/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-66428

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 27, 2026

@igsilya: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66428 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle OCPBUGS-74492: CORENET-6055: [release-4.17] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP

Details

In response to this:

/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-66428

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title CORENET-6055: [release-4.17] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP OCPBUGS-74492: CORENET-6055: [release-4.17] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP Jan 27, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 27, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66428 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66428 targets the "4.18.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0, 4.18.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

OVN-Kubernetes is currently using the latest OVN builds already, so this PR doesn't actually change anything for the current images. But it will bring newer OVN builds automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.18: #2895

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya igsilya changed the title OCPBUGS-74492: CORENET-6055: [release-4.17] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP OCPBUGS-74492, CORENET-6055: [release-4.17] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP Jan 27, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 27, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66428 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66428 targets the "4.18.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0, 4.18.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

OVN-Kubernetes is currently using the latest OVN builds already, so this PR doesn't actually change anything for the current images. But it will bring newer OVN builds automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.18: #2895

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Jan 27, 2026

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 27, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66428 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66428 targets the "4.18.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0, 4.18.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Jan 27, 2026

Half the jobs failed to fetch existing microshift image for some reason.
/retest

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Jan 27, 2026

Timed out installing unrelated RPMs...
/retest

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Jan 28, 2026

GCP infra provisioning issues, windows didn't pass for a very long time.
/retest-required

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Jan 28, 2026

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 28, 2026

@igsilya: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security 039a0e1 link false /test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Jan 29, 2026

Let's try one more time. For some reason the node rediness checks expects 6 nodes, but there are only 5...
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview

Copy link
Contributor

@ricky-rav ricky-rav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/LGTM
/approve

@ricky-rav
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows
/verified by ci

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ricky-rav: This PR has been marked as verified by ci.

Details

In response to this:

/label backport-risk-assessed
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows
/verified by ci

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 3, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: igsilya, ricky-rav

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 3, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

@ricky-rav: Overrode contexts on behalf of ricky-rav: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows

Details

In response to this:

/label backport-risk-assessed
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows
/verified by ci

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ricky-rav
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed label

@ricky-rav
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Feb 5, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit f1ca69a into openshift:release-4.17 Feb 5, 2026
26 of 27 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@igsilya: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74492 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

OVN-Kubernetes is currently using the latest OVN builds already, so this PR doesn't actually change anything for the current images. But it will bring newer OVN builds automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.18: #2895

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 5, 2026

/cherrypick release-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@igsilya: #2959 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.16":

Applying: Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	Dockerfile.base
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging Dockerfile.base
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in Dockerfile.base
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP.

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.17.0-0.nightly-2026-02-06-091352

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.