Skip to content

Comments

OCPBUGS-76403, CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP#2974

Open
igsilya wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.15from
igsilya:ovn-unpin-4.15
Open

OCPBUGS-76403, CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP#2974
igsilya wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.15from
igsilya:ovn-unpin-4.15

Conversation

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor

@igsilya igsilya commented Feb 9, 2026

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.16: #2972

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins.
This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and
especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging
this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug
fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can
take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it
automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it.  There is
a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that
ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released
through FDP.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 9, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 9, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.16: #2972

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 9, 2026

/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-76277

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 9, 2026

@igsilya: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76403. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle OCPBUGS-76403: CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP

Details

In response to this:

/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-76277

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP OCPBUGS-76403: CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP Feb 9, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 9, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76403, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.16: #2972

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 9, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: igsilya
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign abhat for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 9, 2026

/retitle OCPBUGS-76403, CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 9, 2026

/retitle OCPBUGS-76403, CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title OCPBUGS-76403: CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP OCPBUGS-76403, CORENET-6055: [release-4.15] Dockerfile: Unpin OVN and consume the latest from FDP Feb 9, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 9, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76403, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

OVN-Kubernetes is always lagging behind on the version of OVN it pins. This is causing a lot of trouble with keeping up with bug fixes and especially CVE fixes on older branches, resulting in scanners flagging this image with poor security grades and much longer time for bug fixes to be delivered to customers as the PR backporting process can take weeks or even months.

Removing the pin, so every time the new build is released in FDP, it automatically gets into versions of OpneShift that use it. There is a pre-release testing process in place between FDP and OCP QE that ensures the required test coverage before the new build is released through FDP.

Keeping OKD versions separate since sometimes new major versions are not released at the same time in FDP/RHEL and CentOS, so we may need them different at some point in time.

This PR will bring updated OVN builds and will allow picking up newer ones automatically as soon as they are released in the future. Major version upgrades still require a separate PR.

(cherry picked from commit 3771a89)

Manual cherry pick of the change from 4.16: #2972

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 9, 2026

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 9, 2026

@igsilya: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/lint 37686e1 link true /test lint
ci/prow/security 37686e1 link false /test security
ci/prow/gofmt 37686e1 link true /test gofmt
ci/prow/unit 37686e1 link true /test unit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 10, 2026

All passed on re-run. The gofmt/lint/unit jobs seem borked, and will need an override, AFAIU.

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor Author

igsilya commented Feb 11, 2026

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 11, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 11, 2026

@igsilya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76403, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76277 targets the "4.16.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.16.0, 4.16.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

This pull request references CORENET-6055 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.z" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants