Skip to content

Conversation

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort commented Nov 13, 2024

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 13, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tmshort: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Nov 13, 2024

Alternative to #29283
This one doesn't update openshift/api

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Nov 13, 2024

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.18-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 13, 2024

@tmshort: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.18-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/f10e52a0-a1f2-11ef-856c-c732c763feb6-0

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Nov 13, 2024

/test what-is-available

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 13, 2024

@wking: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test e2e-aws-jenkins
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-image-registry
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-builds
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-image-ecosystem
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • /test images
  • /test lint
  • /test unit
  • /test verify
  • /test verify-deps

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test 4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback
  • /test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd
  • /test e2e-aws
  • /test e2e-aws-csi
  • /test e2e-aws-disruptive
  • /test e2e-aws-etcd-certrotation
  • /test e2e-aws-etcd-recovery
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-ipsec-serial
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-kubevirt
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview-serial
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upi
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-virt-techpreview
  • /test e2e-aws-proxy
  • /test e2e-azure
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-baremetalds-kubevirt
  • /test e2e-external-aws
  • /test e2e-external-aws-ccm
  • /test e2e-external-vsphere-ccm
  • /test e2e-gcp-csi
  • /test e2e-gcp-disruptive
  • /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-serial
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-ipv6
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia
  • /test e2e-metal-ovn-single-node-live-iso
  • /test e2e-metal-ovn-single-node-with-worker-live-iso
  • /test e2e-openstack-ovn
  • /test e2e-openstack-serial
  • /test e2e-vsphere
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling
  • /test okd-e2e-gcp
  • /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test okd-scos-images

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-csi
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-fips
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-csi
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-openstack-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-lint
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-verify-deps
Details

In response to this:

/test what-is-available

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Nov 13, 2024

/retest

1 similar comment
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Nov 13, 2024

/retest

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Nov 13, 2024

The tech-preview payload run failed on an unrelated KubeAPIErrorBudgetBurn issue. It skipped the OLM tests:

$ curl -s https://storage.googleapis.com/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-origin-29290-ci-4.18-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview/1856776673144344576/build-log.txt | grep OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM
started: 0/281/508 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 CRDs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
skipped: (2.4s) 2024-11-13T21:04:00 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 CRDs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
started: 0/291/508 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 operator installation should install a cluster extension [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
skipped: (3.1s) 2024-11-13T21:04:08 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 operator installation should install a cluster extension [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
started: 0/354/508 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 Catalogs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
skipped: (2.7s) 2024-11-13T21:04:46 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 Catalogs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

because it was run early enough that openshift/cluster-version-operator#1108 wasn't in 4.18 CI builds yet. Launching a fresh tech-preview job:

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview

Copy link
Member

@LalatenduMohanty LalatenduMohanty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 13, 2024
@neisw
Copy link
Contributor

neisw commented Nov 14, 2024

/approve
/hold

Looked like e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview had the same skip. Feel free to remove the hold when you are ready.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 14, 2024
@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Nov 14, 2024

e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview:

$ curl -s https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/29290/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/1856824118029062144/artifacts/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/openshift-e2e-test/build-log.txt | grep OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM
started: 0/27/508 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 CRDs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
skipped: (6.3s) 2024-11-14T00:06:50 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 CRDs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
started: 0/118/508 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 operator installation should install a cluster extension [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
skipped: (6.3s) 2024-11-14T00:08:06 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 operator installation should install a cluster extension [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
started: 5/489/508 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 Catalogs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
skipped: (4.2s) 2024-11-14T00:16:50 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 Catalogs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
$ curl -s https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/29290/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/1856824118029062144/artifacts/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/openshift-e2e-test/build-log.txt | grep -B3 OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM | tail -n4
skip [github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/olm/olmv1.go:168]: Test only runs with OLMv1 capability
Ginkgo exit error 3: exit with code 3

skipped: (4.2s) 2024-11-14T00:16:50 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 Catalogs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

Hmm, that's surprising.

$ curl -s https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/29290/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/1856824118029062144/artifacts/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/gather-extra/artifacts/clusterversion.json | jq -r '.items[].status.capabilities.knownCapabilities[]' | grep O
OperatorLifecycleManager

So still no sign of OperatorLifecycleManagerV1.

$ curl -s https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/29290/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/1856824118029062144/artifacts/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/gather-extra/artifacts/pods/openshift-cluster-version_cluster-version-operator-769cf984fc-p7xr7_cluster-version-operator.log | head -n1
I1113 23:02:05.498754       1 start.go:23] ClusterVersionOperator v1.0.0-1268-g2e594cdd-dirty

In a CVO checkout:

cluster-version-operator$ git --no-pager log --first-parent --format='%ad %h %s' -2
Wed Nov 13 18:45:27 2024 +0000 b0eddfee Merge pull request #1108 from LalatenduMohanty/add_olmv1_capability_api
Mon Nov 11 15:57:13 2024 +0000 2e594cdd Merge pull request #1091 from petr-muller/scaffold-update-status-operator

so this cluster is still not using the new CVO commit? Back to the job run

INFO[2024-11-13T22:21:20Z] Building release initial from a snapshot of ocp/4.18 
INFO[2024-11-13T22:21:20Z] Building release latest from a snapshot of ocp/4.18

Checking app.ci:

$ oc whoami -c
default/api-ci-l2s4-p1-openshiftapps-com:6443/wking
$ oc -n ocp get -o json imagestream 4.18 | jq -c '.status.tags[] | select(.tag == "cluster-version-operator").items[] | {created, image}'
{"created":"2024-11-13T19:20:49Z","image":"sha256:91dda68f5256eeae7c934e677e7a8b36add124faad0c4124e44063af2c008efa"}
{"created":"2024-11-11T16:23:01Z","image":"sha256:762a726e9118e1879691044d61c9cd6e388c2add8e6da920b74ba455c8975a55"}
{"created":"2024-11-11T12:47:21Z","image":"sha256:bef79b6f45e551a34e3d22877721cf8f4937b80f0b233d34fdeb259181313c48"}
$ oc image info registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/4.18@sha256:91dda68f5256eeae7c934e677e7a8b36add124faad0c4124e44063af2c008efa | grep 'Created\|vcs-ref'
Created:       9h ago
               vcs-ref=b0eddfee2890ed868cbecc36594490e9afa6c9f1

Hmm, certainly looks like pulling ocp/4.18 at 22:21 UTC should have picked up that most-recent commit pushed 19:20 UTC? Not sure why the running CVO in this cluster is claiming to be from the older commit.

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Nov 14, 2024

More poking at that run:

$ curl -s https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/29290/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/1856824118029062144/artifacts/build-resources/imagestreams.json | jq -c '.items[] | .metadata.name as $n | .status.tags[] | select(.tag == "cluster-version-operator").items[] | {created, image, imageStream: $n}'
{"created":"2024-11-13T19:14:55Z","image":"sha256:762a726e9118e1879691044d61c9cd6e388c2add8e6da920b74ba455c8975a55","imageStream":"stable"}
{"created":"2024-11-13T19:14:59Z","image":"sha256:762a726e9118e1879691044d61c9cd6e388c2add8e6da920b74ba455c8975a55","imageStream":"stable-initial"}

So that's picking up the older hash. But I'm not clear on why, since it seems like it had been rotated out of the source ImageStream by that point. Maybe syncing between app.ci and the build clusters is slow? Testing again:

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 14, 2024
@openshift-trt-bot
Copy link

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 642b542

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial Low
[sig-node] static pods should start after being created
This test has passed 77.97% of 59 runs on jobs ['periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.18-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial'] in the last 14 days.

Open Bugs
Static pod controller pods sometimes fail to start [etcd]

@tmshort tmshort force-pushed the add-olmv1-capability-alt branch from 642b542 to f551e10 Compare November 14, 2024 13:38
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 14, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 14, 2024
@joelanford
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 14, 2024
@openshift-trt-bot
Copy link

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: f551e10

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (13) are below the historical average (1653): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (13) are below the historical average (2747): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

@tmshort tmshort force-pushed the add-olmv1-capability-alt branch from f551e10 to b66c3b1 Compare November 14, 2024 18:15
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 14, 2024
@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 14, 2024
@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Nov 14, 2024

No new TechPreview jobs on the recent commits, but checking the one I'd launched last night:

$ curl -s https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/29290/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/1856932509166604288/artifacts/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/openshift-e2e-test/build-log.txt | grep NewOLM
started: 2/169/508 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 CRDs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
passed: (5s) 2024-11-14T07:23:01 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 CRDs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
started: 2/274/508 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 operator installation should install a cluster extension [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
passed: (13.3s) 2024-11-14T07:25:02 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 operator installation should install a cluster extension [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
started: 3/403/508 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 Catalogs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
passed: (5.7s) 2024-11-14T07:28:12 "[sig-olmv1][OCPFeatureGate:NewOLM] OLMv1 Catalogs should be installed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
$ curl -s https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/29290/pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/1856932509166604288/artifacts/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview/gather-extra/artifacts/clusterversion.json | jq -r '.items[].status.capabilities.enabledCapabilities[]' | grep O
OperatorLifecycleManager
OperatorLifecycleManagerV1

So the CVO / ClusterVersion bump finally came through, the OperatorLifecycleManagerV1 capability is enabled, the tech-preview suite is running the tests on the capability, and the tests are passing 👍

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Nov 14, 2024

This PR was updated to the point it will no longer pass, because it's expecting v1 APIs now, but it's good to know that the code that deals with capabilities, etc, passes.

@tmshort tmshort force-pushed the add-olmv1-capability-alt branch from b66c3b1 to 5268ec0 Compare November 14, 2024 21:11
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 14, 2024
Remove OLMv1 TechPreview check in favor of feature gate
Use hard-coded capability for now

Signed-off-by: Todd Short <[email protected]>
@tmshort tmshort force-pushed the add-olmv1-capability-alt branch from 5268ec0 to 6474902 Compare November 15, 2024 04:03
@joelanford
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@joelanford
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Nov 15, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 15, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: grokspawn, joelanford, LalatenduMohanty, neisw, tmshort

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 90f6954 and 2 for PR HEAD 6474902 in total

@perdasilva
Copy link

/retest

1 similar comment
@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@joelanford
Copy link
Member

The 4.18 CI builds seem to be failing to even create payload images since our sync changes merged. As I understand it, nothing here will pass until we have a CI image that picks up the changes we merged last night.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 15, 2024

@tmshort: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 6474902 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-trt-bot
Copy link

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 6474902

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn High
[sig-arch] Only known images used by tests
This test has passed 100.00% of 35 runs on jobs ['periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.18-e2e-aws-ovn'] in the last 14 days.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 92addf5 into openshift:master Nov 15, 2024
@tmshort tmshort deleted the add-olmv1-capability-alt branch November 15, 2024 14:49
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: openshift-enterprise-tests
This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-tests-container-v4.19.0-202411151636.p0.g92addf5.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Nov 22, 2024

/retitle OPRUN-3594: Add Capability and FeatureGate checks to OLMv1 tests

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title NO-ISSUE: Add Capability and FeatureGate checks to OLMv1 tests OPRUN-3594: Add Capability and FeatureGate checks to OLMv1 tests Nov 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.