Skip to content

Conversation

@enxebre
Copy link
Member

@enxebre enxebre commented May 15, 2019

Scope down permissions to openshift-machine-api namespace
Needs - openshift/cluster-api-provider-aws#209
Needs #316

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 15, 2019
@enxebre enxebre changed the title Explicit namespace perms scope down permissions to namespace May 15, 2019
@enxebre enxebre force-pushed the role branch 2 times, most recently from 04fbeee to 1b06b3e Compare May 15, 2019 15:51
@enxebre
Copy link
Member Author

enxebre commented May 16, 2019

/retest

1 similar comment
@enxebre
Copy link
Member Author

enxebre commented May 16, 2019

/retest

@enxebre enxebre force-pushed the role branch 2 times, most recently from 8229d42 to 40129e1 Compare May 16, 2019 17:12
@spangenberg
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 16, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 27, 2019
@enxebre enxebre force-pushed the role branch 2 times, most recently from d00d8ff to 691fac8 Compare May 27, 2019 13:11
@enxebre
Copy link
Member Author

enxebre commented May 28, 2019

/test integration

2 similar comments
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

/test integration

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

/test integration

args := []string{
"--logtostderr=true",
"--v=3",
"--namespace=openshift-machine-api",
Copy link
Member

@ingvagabund ingvagabund Jun 2, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs to be parametrized. ci/jenkins/integration expects all machines to live under kube-system, not openshift-machine-api. Otherwise, no machine can be found by the machine-controller and no machine is created, no machine status updated, no machine linked with a node. Thus the reason why the CI is failing.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 3, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 11, 2019
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ingvagabund

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 11, 2019
@spangenberg
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 11, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c6eb133 into openshift:master Jun 11, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@enxebre: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/actuator-pkg-staleness d086fac link /test actuator-pkg-staleness

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

mandre added a commit to mandre/installer that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2019
With openshift/machine-api-operator#315 the Machine API Operator
doesn't have access to the `kube-system` namespace anymore.

We now need to issue a CredentialsRequest in MAO and retrieve it from
the `openshift-machine-api` namespace here.

Needs openshift/machine-api-operator#324
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants