Skip to content

Conversation

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Since openshift/installer#6304 merged, our default webhook that defaults the Azure image resource ID has been broken. This PR updates our defaulting logic to match the format in the installer PR which should resolve the recent Azure minimal webhook test failures we've been seeing

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from Fedosin and lobziik October 13, 2022 09:37
Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

azureCachingTypeNone = "None"
azureCachingTypeReadOnly = "ReadOnly"
azureCachingTypeReadWrite = "ReadWrite"
azureRHCOSVersion = "412.86.202209220538-0"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How often will this change?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, I have feeling that this might change over new z-stream releases...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Every release AFAIK, we should try to find a way to keep this up to date by looking it up witihin the cluster or somewhere but for now I want to get things fixed.
FWIW installer update their config every release

Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo Oct 13, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there any way to reference a stable (or similar) RHCOS alias that points to the latest?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JoelSpeed WDYT about add a comment with some additional context?
I believe value of this constant came from this file: https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/data/data/coreos/rhcos.json

Think future us might appreciate such breadcrumbs :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I already appreciate this breadcrumb :shipit:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 13, 2022
@lobziik
Copy link
Contributor

lobziik commented Oct 13, 2022

/approve
/hold
Lets wait tests results

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 13, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lobziik

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Oct 13, 2022
@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed force-pushed the update-azure-default-image branch from c2022a6 to c816737 Compare October 13, 2022 14:05
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reviewing the azure operator log, the autoscaler tests failed but the minimal webhook test is now passing again

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 13, 2022
Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice addition the latest one.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 13, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD a144012 and 2 for PR HEAD c816737 in total

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator

All passed except the autoscaler tests, Azure proved already this change has fixed the test that was failiing

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2022

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator

All passed except the autoscaler tests, Azure proved already this change has fixed the test that was failiing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2022

@JoelSpeed: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn c816737 link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator c816737 link false /test e2e-gcp-operator
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 c816737 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade c816737 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-openstack c816737 link false /test e2e-openstack
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt c816737 link false /test e2e-libvirt
ci/prow/e2e-nutanix c816737 link false /test e2e-nutanix
ci/prow/e2e-azure-operator c816737 link false /test e2e-azure-operator
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-sdn c816737 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-upgrade c816737 link false /test e2e-vsphere-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit bebd7e3 into master Oct 14, 2022
@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed deleted the update-azure-default-image branch October 17, 2022 08:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants