Skip to content

Conversation

@benluddy
Copy link

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Sep 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@benluddy: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@benluddy
Copy link
Author

Corresponding patch for the k8s.io/apiserver fork that the aggregated apiservers use: openshift/kubernetes-apiserver#72.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 16, 2025
// are purely passthroughs to the delegate. During a rebase, consider whether or not it is
// safe and appropriate for a new method added to the method set of storage.Interface to
// perform retries.
delegate storage.Interface

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is the same code as in openshift/kubernetes-apiserver#72

@benluddy benluddy force-pushed the etcd-retry-getcurrentresourceversion branch from a79faa7 to bd238e1 Compare September 17, 2025 14:47
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@benluddy: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link

/lgtm

@benluddy benluddy changed the title UPSTREAM: <carry> Add retries for GetCurrentResourceVersion. UPSTREAM: <carry>: Add retries for GetCurrentResourceVersion. Sep 17, 2025
@benluddy
Copy link
Author

/remove-label backports/unvalidated-commits

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Sep 17, 2025
@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 17, 2025
@benluddy benluddy changed the title UPSTREAM: <carry>: Add retries for GetCurrentResourceVersion. OCPBUGS-61754: UPSTREAM: <carry>: Add retries for GetCurrentResourceVersion. Sep 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@benluddy: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61754, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @geliu2016

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 17, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: benluddy, p0lyn0mial

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 17, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: benluddy, p0lyn0mial

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@benluddy
Copy link
Author

/verified later @benluddy

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added verified-later verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria labels Sep 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@benluddy: This PR has been marked to be verified later by @benluddy.

In response to this:

/verified later @benluddy

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@benluddy
Copy link
Author

/cherry-pick release-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@benluddy: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.20 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b59afbd and 2 for PR HEAD bd238e1 in total

@benluddy
Copy link
Author

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@benluddy
Copy link
Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 18, 2025

@benluddy: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial bd238e1 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn bd238e1 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 95b8140 into openshift:master Sep 18, 2025
23 of 25 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@benluddy: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61754: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

This pull request has the verified-later tag and will need to be manually moved to VERIFIED after testing. Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61754 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@benluddy: new pull request created: #2469

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

Fix included in accepted release 4.21.0-0.nightly-2025-09-18-193221

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria verified-later

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants