Skip to content

Conversation

@LorbusChris
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 26, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@LorbusChris: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22315, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-4038 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-4038 targets the "4.15.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.15.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gpei

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Cherrypicks of

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from gpei October 26, 2023 19:43
@LorbusChris
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @andfasano @JM1 @vrutkovs

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 26, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sdodson for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 26, 2023

@LorbusChris: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/aro-unit efc3fd7 link true /test aro-unit
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn efc3fd7 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-ovn efc3fd7 link false /test okd-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/okd-scos-images efc3fd7 link true /test okd-scos-images
ci/prow/govet efc3fd7 link true /test govet
ci/prow/images efc3fd7 link true /test images
ci/prow/okd-unit efc3fd7 link true /test okd-unit
ci/prow/okd-images efc3fd7 link true /test okd-images
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade efc3fd7 link false /test okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade efc3fd7 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-gcp efc3fd7 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade efc3fd7 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade efc3fd7 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn efc3fd7 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/golint efc3fd7 link true /test golint
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-workers-rhel8 efc3fd7 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-workers-rhel8
ci/prow/okd-scos-unit efc3fd7 link false /test okd-scos-unit
ci/prow/unit efc3fd7 link true /test unit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@LorbusChris
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andfasano looks like this'll require a backport of #7508

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Contributor

 # github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/asset/ignition/bootstrap
pkg/asset/ignition/bootstrap/common.go:182:42: templateData.Invoker undefined (type *bootstrapTemplateData has no field or method Invoker) 

@LorbusChris
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold
checking whether the second commit is really required in #7628

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 30, 2023
@LorbusChris
Copy link
Contributor Author

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Oct 30, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 30, 2023

@LorbusChris: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@LorbusChris: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-22315. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Cherrypicks of

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants