Skip to content

Add IBM Power VS: machine assets#5611

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 3 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
clnperez:new-machine-assets
Mar 15, 2022
Merged

Add IBM Power VS: machine assets#5611
openshift-merge-robot merged 3 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
clnperez:new-machine-assets

Conversation

@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@clnperez clnperez commented Feb 4, 2022

For more background on IPI on Power VS, refer to the enhancement
proposal here: openshift/enhancements#736

Older discussions on some of the code here can be found in #5224

Signed-off-by: Christy Norman christy@linux.vnet.ibm.com

Comment thread pkg/asset/machines/powervs/machines.go Outdated
Comment thread pkg/asset/machines/powervs/machinesets.go Outdated
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@rna-afk does anyone else need eyes on the rest of these?

@rna-afk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rna-afk commented Feb 22, 2022

I cannot approve these PRs so I'll make sure to review it before I ask one of the team members to approve it.

Comment thread pkg/asset/machines/powervs/machines.go Outdated
Comment thread pkg/asset/machines/powervs/machines.go Outdated
Comment thread pkg/asset/machines/worker.go Outdated
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@rna-afk made all suggested changes

@rna-afk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rna-afk commented Feb 28, 2022

/lgtm
cc @staebler for approval

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 28, 2022
@kirankt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

kirankt commented Feb 28, 2022

Please re-verify vendoring.

@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

clnperez commented Mar 1, 2022

/test verify-vendor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@staebler staebler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine to me. I'll add my approve. I am removing the lgtm for my comment. @rna-afk, feel free to re-add the lgtm when the comment is addressed or an explained.
/approve
/lgtm cancel

Comment thread pkg/asset/machines/master.go Outdated
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 1, 2022
@clnperez clnperez force-pushed the new-machine-assets branch from a6e9ece to 1caca8a Compare March 1, 2022 17:10
@clnperez clnperez force-pushed the new-machine-assets branch 2 times, most recently from 0548afa to 28bda71 Compare March 4, 2022 00:58
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

clnperez commented Mar 8, 2022

@patrickdillon assuming these tests all pass after #5612 merges, can either you or @staebler add your approve? it looks like Matthew's didn't take from his last comment.

@rna-afk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rna-afk commented Mar 8, 2022

Matthew already approved it so I will give an lgtm once #5612 passes

@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

clnperez commented Mar 9, 2022

There is no approve label though. Do we need one?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@staebler staebler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 9, 2022
@staebler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 11, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@staebler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

verify-vendor is failing

/lgtm cancel

@staebler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

staebler commented Mar 11, 2022

verify-vendor is failing

/lgtm cancel

github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install imports
	github.com/openshift/library-go/pkg/config/clusteroperator/v1helpers loaded from github.com/openshift/library-go@v0.0.0-20210811133500-5e31383de2a7,
	but go 1.16 would select v0.0.0-20211214183058-58531ccbde67
github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install imports
	github.com/openshift/library-go/pkg/route/routeapihelpers loaded from github.com/openshift/library-go@v0.0.0-20210811133500-5e31383de2a7,
	but go 1.16 would select v0.0.0-20211214183058-58531ccbde67

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 11, 2022
@clnperez clnperez force-pushed the new-machine-assets branch from 28bda71 to 315d985 Compare March 15, 2022 15:45
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 15, 2022
@clnperez clnperez force-pushed the new-machine-assets branch 2 times, most recently from fa1eee8 to 5844146 Compare March 15, 2022 16:27
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 15, 2022
@clnperez clnperez force-pushed the new-machine-assets branch from 5844146 to 7a192a3 Compare March 15, 2022 16:45
staebler and others added 2 commits March 15, 2022 14:22
Update the go version used for verifying vendoring from 1.16 to 1.17.
The CI job uses its own image and does not use the image specified
in the script. Therefore, the go version in the script must match
the go version in the CI job, particularly when there are breaking
changes between go versions (as there are between 1.16 and 1.17
when it comes to modules).
For more background on IPI on Power VS, refer to the enhancement
proposal here: openshift/enhancements#736

Older discussions on some of the code here can be found in openshift#5224

Signed-off-by: Christy Norman <christy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I cherry-picked in #5709 and running ./verify-vendor.sh doesn't introduce any new changes, so I think as soon as that merges this will be good. It will just need a manual re-test.

@clnperez clnperez force-pushed the new-machine-assets branch from 7a192a3 to e0d70a9 Compare March 15, 2022 20:10
@staebler staebler force-pushed the new-machine-assets branch 2 times, most recently from a2e8b6f to ae2d4fa Compare March 15, 2022 20:30
Comment thread go.mod Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like go mod tidy is adamant about keeping this change now.

Signed-off-by: Christy Norman <christy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
@staebler staebler force-pushed the new-machine-assets branch from ae2d4fa to 1608772 Compare March 15, 2022 20:45
@staebler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 15, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 15, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: staebler

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a4fa02e into openshift:master Mar 15, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 15, 2022

@clnperez: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-workers-rhel7 a5a89a0bcf8c5b044bd2a72d19bd22b3e5f68bdb link false /test e2e-aws-workers-rhel7
ci/prow/e2e-ibmcloud 1608772 link false /test e2e-ibmcloud
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade 1608772 link false /test okd-e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips 1608772 link false /test e2e-aws-fips
ci/prow/e2e-ovirt 1608772 link false /test e2e-ovirt
ci/prow/e2e-crc 1608772 link false /test e2e-crc

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants