Skip to content

Conversation

@jsafrane
Copy link

@jsafrane jsafrane commented Sep 8, 2020

Rebase to v2.0.0 for OCP 4.6.

Diff to upstream v2.0.0:
kubernetes-csi/external-provisioner@v2.0.0...jsafrane:rebase-v2.0.0

@openshift/storage

pohly and others added 30 commits March 4, 2020 11:39
Developers should not be forced to build for all platforms by
default. We also don't want to copy-and-paste the go invocation for
each new platform.

To address both, the target platform(s) are now configurable via
BUILD_PLATFORMS and additional platforms are only enabled in the Prow
CI.

For now this serves as a test that the source actually compiles for
multiple platforms. Building images for different target platforms is a
different problem.
build for multiple platforms only in CI, add s390x
Signed-off-by: Grant Griffiths <grant@portworx.com>
…pdate

Update snapshotter to version 2.0.1
Signed-off-by: Humble Chirammal <hchiramm@redhat.com>
Correct package import and var declaration
This PR removes the `--enable-leader-election` flag
and add `leader-election` flag as other sidecar containers.
Signed-off-by: Humble Chirammal <hchiramm@redhat.com>
To clarify what the version means.
Make leader-election flag consistent with other sidecar
…ion-capability

Start clone protection only when capability matches
Signed-off-by: Grant Griffiths <grant@portworx.com>
…ter_rbac_version_set

Fix csi-snapshotter RBAC yaml version
Update patch release notes generation command
Going forward we are using the GA version of the CSINode
object in the sidecars. However, Kubernetes v1.16 only
contains the v1beta1 version of that object, hence we
need to skip the prow job in this version.
Use v1.CSINode in the external-provisioner
Addresses #84226
This change prevents calling DeleteVolume on the CSI plugin for volumes that are still attached to a kubernetes node.
Add VolumeAttachment Lister to CSI Provisioner
The approach taken here extends the existing support for
cross-compiling binaries on the build host and specifying the Go
compiler: Go is installed if needed (as in Prow testing), binaries are
build on the host, then one image is created for each platform, and
finally those are combined into a single multi-architecture image.
cloud build: initial set of shared files
Commit summary:
bd41690 cloud build: initial set of shared files
6f2322e Update patch release notes generation command
d8c76fe Support local snapshot RBAC for pull jobs
ea1f94a update release tools instructions
7edc146 Update snapshotter to version 2.0.1
3863a0f build for multiple platforms only in CI, add s390x
master: update release-tools, enable cloud build
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bertinatto, jsafrane

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [bertinatto,jsafrane]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jsafrane jsafrane changed the title Rebase to v2.0.0 Big 1876791: Rebase to v2.0.0 Sep 8, 2020
@jsafrane jsafrane changed the title Big 1876791: Rebase to v2.0.0 Bug 1876791: Rebase to v2.0.0 Sep 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1876791, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
Details

In response to this:

Bug 1876791: Rebase to v2.0.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 8, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Author

jsafrane commented Sep 8, 2020

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 8, 2020
@jsafrane
Copy link
Author

jsafrane commented Sep 9, 2020

/retest

@jsafrane
Copy link
Author

jsafrane commented Sep 9, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 9, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Author

jsafrane commented Sep 9, 2020

The last failure was caused by old aws-ebs image used in tests (still uses --provisioner argument)

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Author

jsafrane commented Sep 9, 2020

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 223bbb8 into openshift:master Sep 9, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1876791 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1876791: Rebase to v2.0.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.