Bug 2034484: library-go bump#1276

Merged

openshift-merge-robot merged 2 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom

jerpeter1:bump-library-go

Jan 4, 2022

Member

jerpeter1 commented Dec 17, 2021

pull in to grab fix described here openshift/library-go#1272

openshift-ci Bot requested review from mfojtik and sttts

December 17, 2021 19:59


          pull in to grab fix described here openshift/library-go#1272

8d2f02b

jerpeter1 force-pushed the bump-library-go branch from e3e4830 to 8d2f02b Compare

December 17, 2021 20:08

Member Author

jerpeter1 commented Dec 17, 2021

/retest-required

1 similar comment

Member Author

jerpeter1 commented Dec 17, 2021

/retest-required

Member Author

jerpeter1 commented Dec 19, 2021

/hold

openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold label

deads2k mentioned this pull request

POC of lib-go fix #1282

Closed


          Pickup latest library-go to pickup fixes for resource cache

a828a27

Member Author

jerpeter1 commented Dec 20, 2021

/unhold

openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold label

Contributor

qJkee commented Dec 21, 2021

/retest-required

2 similar comments

Member Author

jerpeter1 commented Dec 21, 2021

/retest-required

Member Author

jerpeter1 commented Dec 22, 2021

/retest-required

Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 22, 2021 •

edited

Loading

@jerpeter1: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node	`a828a27`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-single-node`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-disruptive-single-node	`a828a27`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-operator-disruptive-single-node`
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp-serial	`a828a27`	link	false	`/test k8s-e2e-gcp-serial`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

ggiguash commented Dec 23, 2021

/retest-required

sanchezl added the approved label

Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 24, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: jerpeter1

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

sanchezl removed the approved label

sanchezl reviewed

View reviewed changes

Contributor

sanchezl left a comment

I don't see that the fix you mentioned has been pulled in. (needs another bump?)

Contributor

qJkee commented Dec 27, 2021

@sanchezl
fix is in eca2c46 commit. As you can see, the same hash in go.mod

sanchezl added approved lgtm labels

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 3, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 3, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 3, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 3, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 3, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 3, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

20 similar comments

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Jan 4, 2022

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

jerpeter1 changed the title ~~fix:bump library-go~~ Bug 2034484 fix:bump library-go

jerpeter1 changed the title ~~Bug 2034484 fix:bump library-go~~ Bug 203448: library-go bump

jerpeter1 changed the title ~~Bug 203448: library-go bump~~ Bug 2034484: library-go bump

openshift-ci Bot added the bugzilla/severity-high label

Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jan 4, 2022

@jerpeter1: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2034484, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (jhou@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2034484: library-go bump

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci Bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug label

openshift-merge-robot merged commit c39e6d1 into openshift:master

Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jan 4, 2022

@jerpeter1: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

openshift/cluster-authentication-operator#525 is open

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Bugzilla bug 2034484 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2034484: library-go bump

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

ingvagabund mentioned this pull request

bump library-go #1281

Closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved bugzilla/severity-high bugzilla/valid-bug lgtm