Skip to content

Conversation

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor

Use the cluster config API where possible for DNS management setup.

  • Get the base domain from the cluster config
  • Discover the AWS region from environment or EC2 metadata

Use the cluster config API where possible for DNS management setup.

* Get the base domain from the cluster config
* Discover the AWS region from environment or EC2 metadata
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 18, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 18, 2018
@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

DNS tested manually. Once openshift/api#145 lands and the installer is updated to use it, we can finally do some e2e tests for this in origin.

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

Or I could introduce something in the operator e2e tests and migrate to origin ASAP?

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

I take it back, adding the test to operator would require adding a bunch of test scaffolding from origin to do things like execute commands from a pods. Not sure if we want to deal with that now when we're so close to being able to write the tests in origin. Anyway, I tested this one myself.

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

Miciah commented Dec 18, 2018

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 18, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ironcladlou, Miciah

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 18, 2018
@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

Whoops, I nearly forgot to block on openshift/installer#934 (I was testing against a patched installer!)

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 19, 2018
@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello? Bots?

/retest

@stevekuznetsov
Copy link

/refresh

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 95ccab1 into openshift:master Dec 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants