Bump all Knative go-deps to version 1.10#2207
Bump all Knative go-deps to version 1.10#2207openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift-knative:mainfrom
Conversation
Okay to me but I guess Stavros is working on #2148 so defer to him. |
/retest |
|
/retest |
b879613 to
006568e
Compare
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
d1ea4ad to
6511564
Compare
| @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ spec: | |||
| spec: | |||
| containers: | |||
| - name: heartbeats | |||
| image: registry.ci.openshift.org/openshift/knative-v1.8:knative-eventing-test-heartbeats | |||
| image: ko://knative.dev/eventing/cmd/heartbeats | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
that's a wrong reference here, we don't do the ko:// this should be proper in midstream....
25b5d87 to
e32bce5
Compare
|
In the job: I see: |
|
/test 4.13-upstream-e2e-kafka-aws-ocp-413 |
|
I don't think it's related. The test is obviously updated in this PR so it expects the KnHeader. All the other tests are passing (channel-related ones etc. which expect the KnHeader as well). So, the Knative Forwarder component should be forwarding the header correctly. I also checked the image of Ping source adapter and it's version 1.10 which is OK. |
|
In the PingSource we add since 1.9 the Kn-Namespace header (openshift-knative/eventing#265). Not sure, if this header gets forwarded in the forwarder too |
|
Trying without the forwarder to see if this is the issue. /hold |
|
|
OK. So it seems the issue is in forwarder... |
|
Yeah. Looking at the logs from the forwarder: Received event: Sent/forwarded event: The kn-namespace header is not forwarded. |
|
I will work on the fix for the forwarder. |
|
Would this be acceptable? knative-extensions/reconciler-test#572 |
Deferring this to Eventing folks @matzew , @creydr . Just out of curiosity, is there a specific reason the forwarder filters headers in the first place? |
No specific reason. Forwarding of headers was just not implemented, probably by mistake. |
should it just be transparent? forward, as is - and not edit/manipulate the actual req? |
|
Apparently, something like this works as well: knative-extensions/reconciler-test#575 |
| @@ -1 +1,2 @@ | |||
| knative.dev/reconciler-test/cmd/eventshub: registry.ci.openshift.org/openshift/knative-eventing-test-eventshub:knative-nightly | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it right that you still use knative-nightly here? Should that be v1.10?
I think you said nightly cannot be used anymore. Just curious.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure, I think my comments were only related to the code deps from main branch because of a conflict with the changes to Adressable upstream. We should be fine with that image (I think..., let's see).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK. Anyway, the backports helped for multiarch builds here: 3863526
We should probably use this image as well here so that we have the multiarch image from the beginning and no need to patch later like in the commit above.
Also, the version will change with each release so we probably need to create a template for this file and generate the resulting file automatically. But this can be done in a follow-up. I'd suggest using the quay image in this file for both eventshub and heartbeats. The latest available heartbeats image at quay is v1.9 though: quay.io/openshift-knative/eventing/heartbeats:v1.9 That's because the image was moved from test images to core images in 1.10 and the github action is not building it (this needs a fix!)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well, it's probably better to use quay images later, not in this PR. There's more work to be done. Let's keep using registry.ci in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
728af06 to
1c93def
Compare
|
/test ? |
|
@matzew: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
It passed. testing it again /test 4.13-operator-e2e-aws-ocp-413 |
matzew
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/lgtm
/approve
/hold until the mentioned e2e test passes
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: matzew, ReToCode The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Yay 🎉 /unhold |
|
/unhold |
|
/test remaining-required |
Proposed Changes
hack/patches/005-conversion-webhook.patchto reflect changes in 1.10hack/patches/013-rekt-test-add-service-port-name.patchbecause it is already in 1.10hack/patches/remove_eventing_ns_manifest.patchto reflect changes in 1.10