Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prov/rxm: fix address comparison to remove duplicate connections #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 29, 2021

Conversation

aingerson
Copy link

The address comparison to determine whether to reject or keep a duplicate
connection was incorrect and falsely identifying too many loopback
connections. The address to compare against should be the local EP's
address, not the peer's address.

This fix exposes an issue with the reject/close path which was not being
taken before. A race condition during simultaneous connections was
occurring where both sides sent a connection request. One side received
a connection request, accepted, and closed its outgoing connection.
However, the connection request had already been received by the peer,
causing the peer to incorrectly identify that connection as a lost
connection, causing send failures for any outstanding sends on that
active connection.

This patch could potentially cause issues in how lost connections are
managed, but testing to date has not shown any issues... yet...

Signed-off-by: aingerson [email protected]

@ooststep ooststep merged commit 64174a7 into ooststep:cm_fixes Jul 29, 2021
The address comparison to determine whether to reject or keep a duplicate
connection was incorrect and falsely identifying too many loopback
connections. The address to compare against should be the local EP's
address, not the peer's address.

This fix exposes an issue with the reject/close path which was not being
taken before. A race condition during simultaneous connections was
occurring where both sides sent a connection request. One side received
a connection request, accepted, and closed its outgoing connection.
However, the connection request had already been received by the peer,
causing the peer to incorrectly identify that connection as a lost
connection, causing send failures for any outstanding sends on that
active connection.

This patch could potentially cause issues in how lost connections are
managed, but testing to date has not shown any issues... yet...

Signed-off-by: aingerson <[email protected]>
ooststep pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2022
Utility providers have to call fi_getinfo again to get core providers
resulting in deceptive and confusing log lines where a core provider
might return FI_ENODATA for a utility provider but FI_SUCCESS for the
app. Extra log levels were added that say Begin/End ofi_get_core_info
to make this clearer but these debug-only (not info) logs can get lost
among the hundreds of lines of output.

To make it easier to distinguish between log lines with and without a
core provider, specifically during fi_getinfo, add a log_prefix to the
log output which clarifies that the log line was outputed as part of
the layered fi_getinfo call

For example, the following log line sees changes as such:
libfabric:53685:1643663041:verbs:fabric:vrb_get_matching_info():1514<info> checking domain: #1 mlx5_0
libfabric:53685:1643663041:ofi_rxm:verbs:fabric:vrb_get_matching_info():1514<info> checking domain: #1 mlx5_0

Signed-off-by: aingerson <[email protected]>
ooststep pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2023
If a posted receive matches with a saved receive, we may need to
increment the rx counter.  Set the rx counter increment callback
to match that of the posted receive.  This fixes an assert in
xnet_cntr_inc() accessing a NULL cntr_inc function pointer.

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x0000155552d4d37f in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#0  0x0000155552d4d37f in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x0000155552d37db5 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2  0x0000155552d37c89 in __assert_fail_base.cold.0 () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3  0x0000155552d45a76 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#4  0x00001555522967f9 in xnet_cntr_inc (ep=0x6e4c70, xfer_entry=0x6f7a30) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_cq.c:347
#5  0x0000155552296836 in xnet_report_cntr_success (ep=0x6e4c70, cq=0x6ca930, xfer_entry=0x6f7a30) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_cq.c:354
#6  0x000015555229970d in xnet_complete_saved (saved_entry=0x6f7a30) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_progress.c:153
#7  0x0000155552299961 in xnet_recv_saved (saved_entry=0x6f7a30, rx_entry=0x6f7840) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_progress.c:188
#8  0x00001555522946f8 in xnet_srx_tag (srx=0x6dd1c0, recv_entry=0x6f7840) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_srx.c:445
ofiwg#9  0x0000155552294bb1 in xnet_srx_trecv (ep_fid=0x6dd1c0, buf=0x6990c4, len=4, desc=0x0, src_addr=0, tag=21474836494, ignore=3458764513820540928, context=0x7ffffffeb180) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_srx.c:558
ofiwg#10 0x000015555228f60e in fi_trecv (ep=0x6dd1c0, buf=0x6990c4, len=4, desc=0x0, src_addr=0, tag=21474836494, ignore=3458764513820540928, context=0x7ffffffeb180) at ./include/rdma/fi_tagged.h:91
ofiwg#11 0x00001555522900a7 in xnet_rdm_trecv (ep_fid=0x6d9fe0, buf=0x6990c4, len=4, desc=0x0, src_addr=0, tag=21474836494, ignore=3458764513820540928, context=0x7ffffffeb180) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_rdm.c:212

Signed-off-by: Sean Hefty <[email protected]>
ooststep pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2023
If a posted receive matches with a saved receive, we may need to
increment the rx counter.  Set the rx counter increment callback
to match that of the posted receive.  This fixes an assert in
xnet_cntr_inc() accessing a NULL cntr_inc function pointer.

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x0000155552d4d37f in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#0  0x0000155552d4d37f in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x0000155552d37db5 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2  0x0000155552d37c89 in __assert_fail_base.cold.0 () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3  0x0000155552d45a76 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#4  0x00001555522967f9 in xnet_cntr_inc (ep=0x6e4c70, xfer_entry=0x6f7a30) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_cq.c:347
#5  0x0000155552296836 in xnet_report_cntr_success (ep=0x6e4c70, cq=0x6ca930, xfer_entry=0x6f7a30) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_cq.c:354
#6  0x000015555229970d in xnet_complete_saved (saved_entry=0x6f7a30) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_progress.c:153
#7  0x0000155552299961 in xnet_recv_saved (saved_entry=0x6f7a30, rx_entry=0x6f7840) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_progress.c:188
#8  0x00001555522946f8 in xnet_srx_tag (srx=0x6dd1c0, recv_entry=0x6f7840) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_srx.c:445
ofiwg#9  0x0000155552294bb1 in xnet_srx_trecv (ep_fid=0x6dd1c0, buf=0x6990c4, len=4, desc=0x0, src_addr=0, tag=21474836494, ignore=3458764513820540928, context=0x7ffffffeb180) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_srx.c:558
ofiwg#10 0x000015555228f60e in fi_trecv (ep=0x6dd1c0, buf=0x6990c4, len=4, desc=0x0, src_addr=0, tag=21474836494, ignore=3458764513820540928, context=0x7ffffffeb180) at ./include/rdma/fi_tagged.h:91
ofiwg#11 0x00001555522900a7 in xnet_rdm_trecv (ep_fid=0x6d9fe0, buf=0x6990c4, len=4, desc=0x0, src_addr=0, tag=21474836494, ignore=3458764513820540928, context=0x7ffffffeb180) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_rdm.c:212

Signed-off-by: Sean Hefty <[email protected]>
ooststep pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2023
If a posted receive matches with a saved receive, we may need to
increment the rx counter.  Set the rx counter increment callback
to match that of the posted receive.  This fixes an assert in
xnet_cntr_inc() accessing a NULL cntr_inc function pointer.

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x0000155552d4d37f in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#0  0x0000155552d4d37f in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x0000155552d37db5 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2  0x0000155552d37c89 in __assert_fail_base.cold.0 () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3  0x0000155552d45a76 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#4  0x00001555522967f9 in xnet_cntr_inc (ep=0x6e4c70, xfer_entry=0x6f7a30) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_cq.c:347
#5  0x0000155552296836 in xnet_report_cntr_success (ep=0x6e4c70, cq=0x6ca930, xfer_entry=0x6f7a30) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_cq.c:354
#6  0x000015555229970d in xnet_complete_saved (saved_entry=0x6f7a30) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_progress.c:153
#7  0x0000155552299961 in xnet_recv_saved (saved_entry=0x6f7a30, rx_entry=0x6f7840) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_progress.c:188
#8  0x00001555522946f8 in xnet_srx_tag (srx=0x6dd1c0, recv_entry=0x6f7840) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_srx.c:445
ofiwg#9  0x0000155552294bb1 in xnet_srx_trecv (ep_fid=0x6dd1c0, buf=0x6990c4, len=4, desc=0x0, src_addr=0, tag=21474836494, ignore=3458764513820540928, context=0x7ffffffeb180) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_srx.c:558
ofiwg#10 0x000015555228f60e in fi_trecv (ep=0x6dd1c0, buf=0x6990c4, len=4, desc=0x0, src_addr=0, tag=21474836494, ignore=3458764513820540928, context=0x7ffffffeb180) at ./include/rdma/fi_tagged.h:91
ofiwg#11 0x00001555522900a7 in xnet_rdm_trecv (ep_fid=0x6d9fe0, buf=0x6990c4, len=4, desc=0x0, src_addr=0, tag=21474836494, ignore=3458764513820540928, context=0x7ffffffeb180) at prov/tcp/src/xnet_rdm.c:212

Signed-off-by: Sean Hefty <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants