Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Markdown code blocks part 4 #20189

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2022
Merged

Conversation

a-mr
Copy link
Contributor

@a-mr a-mr commented Aug 9, 2022

No logic was added, just 8 more files have been migrated.

No logic was added, just 8 more files have been migrated.
@dom96
Copy link
Contributor

dom96 commented Aug 10, 2022

Something I've been meaning to ask. There was a regression in the parser which caused it to fail on things like:

some sentence which will fail the parsing of the following block
\```
CodeBlock()
\```

this works, note the extra newline

\```
CodeBlock()
\```

Do you know if this has been fixed?

@a-mr
Copy link
Contributor Author

a-mr commented Aug 10, 2022

@dom96 No, it's still there, I did not know/remember about that.
If it's essential (for nim forum, I guess?), then I will soon fix it with backport to 1.6.
It should be pretty easy.

@dom96
Copy link
Contributor

dom96 commented Aug 10, 2022

yeah, if you could that would be brilliant, it means lots of forum posts aren't rendering :/

@Varriount Varriount merged commit 713f390 into nim-lang:devel Aug 12, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your hard work on this PR!
The lines below are statistics of the Nim compiler built from 713f390

Hint: mm: orc; threads: on; opt: speed; options: -d:release
163645 lines; 11.923s; 841.684MiB peakmem

a-mr added a commit to a-mr/Nim that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2022
Fixes bug reported in nim-lang#20189
affecting nimforum.
a-mr added a commit to a-mr/Nim that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2022
Fixes bug reported in nim-lang#20189
affecting nimforum.
(manually backported version to 1.6 from devel)
ringabout added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2022
* Improve error message for `strutils.addf` (#20157)

Co-authored-by: ringabout <[email protected]>

* fixes #20153; do not escape `_` for mysql [backport] (#20164)

* fixes #20153; do not escape `_` for mysql

* add a test

* Update db_mysql.nim

* Update tdb_mysql.nim

Co-authored-by: Clay Sweetser <[email protected]>

* [minor] don't find `"Hint: gc"` for action (#20170)

* fixes links in the readme (#20167)

* update the docs of arc following up #19749 (#19752)

Co-authored-by: flywind <[email protected]>

* fixes broken ssl tests (#20181)

* bootstrap the compiler with nimPreviewSlimSystem (#20176)

* bootstrap the compiler with nimPreviewSlimSystem

* threads

* docs: fix some spelling errors (#19816)

* docs: fix some spelling errors

* contributing: fix spelling error

Co-authored-by: konsumlamm <[email protected]>

* Update contributing.md

* Update intern.md

* Update manual.md

* Update manual_experimental_strictnotnil.md

* Update nimgrep_cmdline.txt

* Update pegdocs.txt

* Update testament.md

* Update tut1.md

Co-authored-by: konsumlamm <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Clay Sweetser <[email protected]>

* Build compiler with --noNimblePath (#20168)

- Fixes #18840

* help our poor CI; don't run CI on other branches for push (#20184)

* fix broken runnableExamples for getWeeksInIsoYear (#20193)

Based on what I understand from [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_week_date#Weeks_per_year), 2001 does not have 53 weeks, but 2004, 2009, 2015, 2020 do. The years 2000 and 2001 seem to be copy pasted from the `getDaysInYear` example above. The result of `getWeeksInIsoYear` also seem to match up with Wikipedia.

That means these runnableExamples were never tested. Why is this the case? I only discovered this in #20091.

* improve deprecation error messages (#20197)

* Show beatutiful html instead of ugly markdown preview (#20196)

* closes #6559; add testcase (#20200)

* CI upgrade to ubuntu-20.04 (#20182)

* CI upgrade to ubuntu-20.04 

The ubuntu-18.04 environment is deprecated, consider switching to ubuntu-20.04(ubuntu-latest), or ubuntu-22.04 instead. For more details see actions/runner-images#6002

* Update azure-pipelines.yml

* Markdown code blocks part 4 (#20189)

No logic was added, just 8 more files have been migrated.

* closes #15316; add testcase (#20213)

* add version-1-6 and version-1-2 to triggered branches (#20214)

* add version-1-6 and version-1-2 to triggered branches

* Update .github/workflows/ci_packages.yml

* use quote

* closes #12955; add testcase (#20223)

* add more

Co-authored-by: konsumlamm <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Clay Sweetser <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: flywind <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ee7 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Yonchovski <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: metagn <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andrey Makarov <[email protected]>
Varriount pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2022
Fixes bug reported in #20189
affecting nimforum.
Varriount pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2022
Don't require blank line before Markdown code

Fixes bug reported in #20189
affecting nimforum.
(manually backported version to 1.6 from devel)
capocasa pushed a commit to capocasa/Nim that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2023
No logic was added, just 8 more files have been migrated.
capocasa pushed a commit to capocasa/Nim that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants