Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #1969, Confirm sb/time reset requirements in coverage test #1970

Merged

Conversation

skliper
Copy link
Contributor

@skliper skliper commented Sep 21, 2021

Describe the contribution

Just added confirmation of sb/time reset requirements that are hard to fully verify operationally.

Testing performed
Locally build/ran unit tests, CI

Expected behavior changes
No Impact

System(s) tested on

  • Hardware: Intel i5/Docker
  • OS: Ubuntu 18.04
  • Versions: Bundle main + this commit

Additional context
None

Third party code
None

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Jacob Hageman - NASA/GSFC

@skliper skliper added the CCB:Ready Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) label Sep 21, 2021
@skliper skliper added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Sep 21, 2021
@astrogeco astrogeco changed the base branch from main to integration-candidate September 21, 2021 19:20
@astrogeco astrogeco merged commit 9f361fd into nasa:integration-candidate Sep 21, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@dmknutsen dmknutsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! The only thing I can see that might be worth adding is the VersionCounter to time_UT.c

@skliper
Copy link
Contributor Author

skliper commented Sep 21, 2021

Looks great! The only thing I can see that might be worth adding is the VersionCounter to time_UT.c

The requirement doesn't apply to VersionCounter, which is really for reference management vs a "normal" counter that is just reported in telemetry (and you can reset whenever you want).

@astrogeco astrogeco removed the CCB:Ready Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) label Sep 22, 2021
astrogeco added a commit to astrogeco/cFS that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2021
**Combines**

nasa/cFE#1967 v6.8.0-rc1+dev1024

nasa/osal#1158 v5.1.0-rc1+dev619

nasa/sch_lab#92 v2.4.0-rc1+dev53

nasa/sample_app#155 v1.2.0-rc1+dev73

nasa/to_lab#105 v2.4.0-rc1+dev58

nasa/ci_lab#93 v2.4.0-rc1+dev46

**Includes:**

*cFE*

nasa/cFE#1948, Update name of macros/functions added to "cfe_assert"

nasa/cFE#1950, Fix Mismatch between MSG API and test case in "TestMsgId" functional test

nasa/cFE#1962, Single time domain in functional time tests

nasa/cFE#1943, add missing inclusions in CFE API headers

nasa/cFE#1964, Use existing /ram for FS header test

nasa/cFE#1956, Add static local to function test so data section is nonzero

nasa/cFE#1960, Make invalid buffer length consistent in es task test

nasa/cFE#1953, Only check base filename in library info functional

nasa/cFE#1970, Confirm sb/time reset requirements in coverage test

nasa/cFE#1947, Fix broken link in App Developers Guide

nasa/cFE#1972, Fix #1971, avoid alias warning on some compilers

*osal*

nas/osal#1149, Enable symbol api test and MIR dump too large

nasa/osal#1152, Fix OSAL loader test hard fails if size exceeded

nasa/osal#1155, add bsp-specific configuration flag registry

nasa/osal#1157, Add os-specifc socket flag function

*Apps*

nasa/ci_lab#92, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required

nasa/sample_app#154, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required

nasa/sch_lab#91, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required

nasa/to_lab#104, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required

Co-authored-by: Jacob Hageman   <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Joseph Hickey   <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adrien Chardon  <[email protected]>
astrogeco added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2021
**Combines**

nasa/cFE#1967 v6.8.0-rc1+dev1024

nasa/osal#1158 v5.1.0-rc1+dev619

nasa/sch_lab#92 v2.4.0-rc1+dev53

nasa/sample_app#155 v1.2.0-rc1+dev73

nasa/to_lab#105 v2.4.0-rc1+dev58

nasa/ci_lab#93 v2.4.0-rc1+dev46

**Includes:**

*cFE*

nasa/cFE#1948, Update name of macros/functions added to "cfe_assert"

nasa/cFE#1950, Fix Mismatch between MSG API and test case in "TestMsgId" functional test

nasa/cFE#1962, Single time domain in functional time tests

nasa/cFE#1943, add missing inclusions in CFE API headers

nasa/cFE#1964, Use existing /ram for FS header test

nasa/cFE#1956, Add static local to function test so data section is nonzero

nasa/cFE#1960, Make invalid buffer length consistent in es task test

nasa/cFE#1953, Only check base filename in library info functional

nasa/cFE#1970, Confirm sb/time reset requirements in coverage test

nasa/cFE#1947, Fix broken link in App Developers Guide

nasa/cFE#1972, Fix #1971, avoid alias warning on some compilers

*osal*

nas/osal#1149, Enable symbol api test and MIR dump too large

nasa/osal#1152, Fix OSAL loader test hard fails if size exceeded

nasa/osal#1155, add bsp-specific configuration flag registry

nasa/osal#1157, Add os-specifc socket flag function

*Apps*

nasa/ci_lab#92, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required

nasa/sample_app#154, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required

nasa/sch_lab#91, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required

nasa/to_lab#104, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required

Co-authored-by: Jacob Hageman   <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Joseph Hickey   <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adrien Chardon  <[email protected]>
@astrogeco
Copy link
Contributor

CCB:2021-09-21 APPROVED

@astrogeco astrogeco added the CCB:Approved Indicates code review and approval by community CCB label Sep 22, 2021
@skliper skliper deleted the fix1969-ut_confirm_reset branch October 22, 2021 19:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CCB:Approved Indicates code review and approval by community CCB
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enhance unit test to check for reset of values on initialization (requirements related)
4 participants