Skip to content

Conversation

@JonLiu1993
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #15896
Pmdk compilation methods are compiled through sln files, so linux is not supported

  • Changes comply with the maintainer guide
  • SHA512s are updated for each updated download
  • The "supports" clause reflects platforms that may be fixed by this new version
  • Any fixed CI baseline entries are removed from that file.
  • Any patches that are no longer applied are deleted from the port's directory.
  • The version database is fixed by rerunning ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committing the result.
  • Only one version is added to each modified port's versions file.

@JonLiu1993 JonLiu1993 added category:port-feature The issue is with a library, which is requesting new capabilities that didn’t exist info:internal labels Sep 14, 2023
@JonLiu1993 JonLiu1993 marked this pull request as ready for review September 15, 2023 02:12
@jimwang118 jimwang118 added the info:needs-maintainer-attention Lets the current 'on rotation' vcpkg maintainer know they need to look at this. label Sep 15, 2023
@vicroms vicroms merged commit 36ff119 into microsoft:master Sep 18, 2023
"homepage": "https://github.com/pmem/pmdk",
"license": "BSD-3-Clause",
"supports": "!(arm | x86)",
"supports": "!(linux | arm | x86)",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does this "fix linux compilation"?

It is just another incomplete port. And note that "Support for Windows and FreeBSD has been deprecated since the PMDK 1.13.0 release and was removed in the PMDK 2.0 release.", https://pmem.io/pmdk/

Copy link
Contributor Author

@JonLiu1993 JonLiu1993 Sep 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In fact, it does not fix pmdk compilation under linux, because the current pmdk compilation method in vcpkg is compiled through sln files. I added supports just to tell users that linux is not supported for the time being. The supports here are really not suitable for the latest version of pmdk 2.0.0. I will upgrade to the latest version 2.0.0 later.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And now we have a baseline regression:

REGRESSION: pmdk:x64-linux is marked as fail but not supported for x64-linux.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Not to mention that msbuild doesn't support osx or android or ...)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where did you see this REGRESSION?

REGRESSION: pmdk:x64-linux is marked as fail but not supported for x64-linux.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

category:port-feature The issue is with a library, which is requesting new capabilities that didn’t exist info:needs-maintainer-attention Lets the current 'on rotation' vcpkg maintainer know they need to look at this.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[pmdk] build failure during installation

4 participants