✨ Add nodeReuse feature#169
Conversation
ad66928 to
31b68be
Compare
|
/hold |
09ac7ba to
8135b9e
Compare
|
/retest |
9bd2b42 to
f129327
Compare
|
/test generate |
f129327 to
afe304e
Compare
|
/retest |
afe304e to
397d245
Compare
|
/retest |
namnx228
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great work!!! Something can be improved that can be found in the comments
397d245 to
dd3fbd6
Compare
|
/retest We have to fix |
|
/retitle Add nodeReuse feature |
dd3fbd6 to
27feb7b
Compare
|
/retest |
27feb7b to
56896aa
Compare
|
/retest |
1b46938 to
a95b343
Compare
|
/retest |
2284a23 to
64f694b
Compare
|
/unhold |
64f694b to
b23b347
Compare
|
/test-integration |
namnx228
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just some nits. Otherwise, it looks good to me
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
|
/test-integration |
kashifest
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/approve
overall looks good.
I have few small nits.
There are places where code entropy could have been reduced specially codes related to KCP and MD search are pretty much redundant, but this is cosmetic change.
Squash the commits please.
| host.OwnerReferences = hostOwnerReferences | ||
|
|
||
| // Delete nodeReuseLabelName from host | ||
| m.Log.Info("Deleting nodeReuseLabelName from host, if any") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why are we deleting the label in setHostConsumerRef ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This was chosen as 'best' time to remove the label while using node reuse feature because once we set consumerRef which means M3M will be linked to BMH with nodeReuse label, and so we do not need the label anymore. Do you foresee any problems with that @kashifest ?
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: furkatgofurov7, kashifest The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
d204323 to
4bad3e8
Compare
|
@namnx228 @kashifest thanks for the reviews/feedbacks, I have addressed/answered most of them. PTAL again. /test-integration |
|
LGTM |
4bad3e8 to
4744662
Compare
Squashing done. /test-integration |
|
/lgtm |
Update OWNERS file
What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds node reuse feature in CAPM3 machine controller.
Implementation of node reuse proposal