✨ Proposal: node reuse#162
Conversation
|
/assign @dhellmann |
|
I'm shifting my focus a bit to an internal project, so it's probably best not to block designs like this on my review. /unassign dhellmann |
6153e8c to
3021135
Compare
3021135 to
29c647b
Compare
|
/cc @maelk |
23d6a2c to
b9af928
Compare
|
@hardys @andfasano proposal has been updated, PTAL. Thanks! |
b9af928 to
562abca
Compare
a86f3ef to
3cde1e9
Compare
3cde1e9 to
93518af
Compare
93518af to
872660b
Compare
andfasano
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In general the main part of the proposal looks definitely in a better shape. I have added one question for a specific scenario that I think it could be worth to clarify, and some suggestions to improve the diagrams.
872660b to
97ae6bb
Compare
97ae6bb to
aeac161
Compare
aeac161 to
0622796
Compare
|
@andfasano the proposal has been updated and we addressed the latest comments(added the label removal step in the diagram). PTAL. Thank you! |
maelk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You should specify that md-pool1 is for the machine deployment named pool1, and if it was KCP, it would be kcp-pool1 . This is not clear, and could be confusing if md and KCP have same names otherwise
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: andfasano, furkatgofurov7, maelk The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
0622796 to
d757cf3
Compare
Thanks for review, updated. |
This version looks good to me, thanks! One nit re the inlined SVG, that would perhaps be better as a separate file? Otherwise happy for this to merge, but we agreed a few days of lazy consensus in the meeting yesterday. |
Thanks. As agreed yesterday in community meeting we will have lazy consensus until next community meeting on Wednesday (10.03) to give time for others to review too. |
|
Lazy consensus period completed and agreed to merge in the community meeting today. /lgtm |
This PR proposes node reuse feature for the upgrade/remediation operations.
Related to: allow disabling disk cleaning
Co-authored by: @fmuyassarov