fix: add ShellCheck enforcement to CI code-quality workflow (t135.6) #432
Conversation
- Add ShellCheck lint step to framework-validation job - Enforces error-severity violations that fail the build - Iterates all git-tracked .sh files with gcc output format - Mark t135.6 subtasks complete (t135.6.1/t135.6.2 done in PR #423)
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughAdded a ShellCheck linting step to the Code Quality workflow that validates all tracked shell scripts. The step iterates through shell files, executes ShellCheck with error-level severity, logs per-file results, counts failures, and returns appropriate exit codes to enforce quality gates. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly improves the project's continuous integration quality gates by introducing mandatory ShellCheck analysis for all shell scripts. This proactive measure aims to catch critical scripting errors early in the development cycle, thereby enhancing the overall reliability and maintainability of the codebase. Concurrently, it brings the project's task documentation up-to-date by marking several completed maintenance and bug-fixing items. Highlights
Changelog
Ignored Files
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates TODO.md to mark several tasks as complete. The changes are consistent with the file's established format and accurately reflect the progress mentioned in the pull request description. The primary change of adding ShellCheck enforcement to the code-quality.yml workflow was not included in the provided file patches, so a review of that implementation was not possible. Based on the available changes, there are no issues to report.
# Conflicts: # TODO.md
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Sat Feb 7 15:33:47 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
|
1 participant
Summary
framework-validationjob incode-quality.yml.shfiles with gcc output format for clear error reportingContext
Task t135.6: Fix CI workflow code-quality.yml issues
Subtask status:
.agenttypo fix) - completed in PR fix: repair corrupted JSON configs and add CI validation #423Design Decisions
-S errorseverity (catches critical issues like syntax errors, unreachable code)warning/info/stylelevels yet to avoid blocking on existing codeubuntu-latestrunners, no extra setup neededgccoutput format for machine-readable error locationsSummary by CodeRabbit