Skip to content

t1043: Align verify ShellCheck with CI and fix Phase 7b reconciliation#1406

Merged
marcusquinn merged 1 commit intomainfrom
hotfix/supervisor-verify-improvements
Feb 13, 2026
Merged

t1043: Align verify ShellCheck with CI and fix Phase 7b reconciliation#1406
marcusquinn merged 1 commit intomainfrom
hotfix/supervisor-verify-improvements

Conversation

@marcusquinn
Copy link
Owner

@marcusquinn marcusquinn commented Feb 13, 2026

Summary

  • Fix 1: Post-merge ShellCheck verification used bare shellcheck (all severities) while CI uses -S error. This caused false verify_failed on pre-existing SC2016/SC1091 info-level violations. Now uses -S warning -x — catches real issues, skips info/style noise, follows source directives.
  • Fix 2: Phase 7b reconciliation tried to transition verify_failed → complete when TODO.md showed [x], but the state machine doesn't allow that. Now excludes verify_failed from Gap 2 reconciliation — it's a meaningful state, not a stale inconsistency.

Impact

  • All 8 verify_failed tasks failed due to ShellCheck severity mismatch (false positives)
  • Phase 7b was logging "Failed to transition" errors every pulse cycle for these tasks
  • After deploy, re-running verify on these tasks should pass with the relaxed severity

Files Changed

  • .agents/scripts/supervisor/deploy.shrun_verify_checks() shellcheck case: add -S warning -x
  • .agents/scripts/supervisor/todo-sync.shreconcile_db_todo() Gap 2: exclude verify_failed

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Chores
    • Updated task reconciliation logic to properly handle post-deployment verification state, preventing unnecessary task reprocessing.
    • Enhanced shell script validation settings to align verification severity levels and source directive handling between local and CI environments.

…iliation

Two systemic issues causing all 8 verify_failed tasks:

1. Post-merge ShellCheck verification used bare 'shellcheck' (all severities)
   while CI uses '-S error'. This caused false failures on pre-existing
   SC2016 (info) and SC1091 (info) violations. Fix: use '-S warning -x'
   which catches real issues but skips info/style noise, and follows
   source directives.

2. Phase 7b reconciliation tried to transition verify_failed tasks to
   'complete' when TODO.md showed [x], but the state machine doesn't
   allow that transition. Fix: exclude verify_failed from Gap 2
   reconciliation — it's a meaningful terminal state (PR merged+deployed,
   verification failed), not a stale inconsistency.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses issues related to task verification and state reconciliation within the supervisor system. It resolves false verify_failed statuses by adjusting ShellCheck's severity threshold to match CI, and prevents continuous reconciliation errors by correctly classifying verify_failed as a terminal state, ensuring the system accurately reflects task completion and verification outcomes.

Highlights

  • ShellCheck Verification Alignment: Aligned post-merge ShellCheck verification with CI by using -S warning -x flags, resolving false verify_failed tasks caused by pre-existing info-level violations (SC2016/SC1091).
  • Phase 7b Reconciliation Fix: Excluded the verify_failed state from Phase 7b reconciliation, preventing "Failed to transition" errors when TODO.md marked tasks as complete, as verify_failed is now treated as a meaningful terminal state.
Changelog
  • .agents/scripts/supervisor/deploy.sh
    • Updated the shellcheck command in run_verify_checks() to include -S warning -x flags.
    • Added comments explaining the new ShellCheck flags and their purpose.
  • .agents/scripts/supervisor/todo-sync.sh
    • Modified the reconcile_db_todo() function to exclude verify_failed from the list of non-terminal states in the Gap 2 reconciliation query.
    • Updated comments to reflect verify_failed as a terminal state and explain its exclusion from reconciliation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Walkthrough

Two supervisor automation shell scripts are refined for production quality: deploy.sh receives ShellCheck invocation flag adjustments (-S warning, -x) to align with CI severity expectations, while todo-sync.sh evolves its reconciliation logic by recognizing verify_failed as a terminal state, preventing unnecessary task reconciliation for already-deployed-but-post-check-failing items.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
ShellCheck Invocation Hardening
.agents/scripts/supervisor/deploy.sh
Added -S warning flag for CI severity alignment and -x flag to follow source directives, preventing SC1091 false positives from sourced files.
Terminal State Logic
.agents/scripts/supervisor/todo-sync.sh
Added verify_failed to the terminal-state exclusion filter in TODO.md reconciliation logic; includes documentation explaining that verify_failed (PR merged+deployed but post-merge checks failed) is handled by re-verification, not reconciliation.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🔧 Shell scripts shine with flags refined,
Verify_failed finds its place in line,
CI severity and sources aligned,
Zero debt gleams—automation divine! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately summarizes both main changes: ShellCheck alignment with CI and Phase 7b reconciliation fix, directly matching the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Merge Conflict Detection ✅ Passed ✅ No merge conflicts detected when merging into main

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch hotfix/supervisor-verify-improvements

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 26 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Fri Feb 13 19:07:50 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Fri Feb 13 19:07:50 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 26

📈 Current Quality Metrics

  • BUGS: 0
  • CODE SMELLS: 26
  • VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Fri Feb 13 19:07:53 UTC 2026


Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@marcusquinn marcusquinn merged commit 466ea36 into main Feb 13, 2026
11 checks passed
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces two well-justified fixes to the supervisor scripts. The first change aligns the post-merge ShellCheck verification with CI by adjusting the severity level, which will reduce noise from stylistic issues and prevent false positives. The second change correctly updates the database reconciliation logic to treat verify_failed as a meaningful terminal state, preventing incorrect state transitions. Both changes are clear, well-commented, and improve the overall robustness and reliability of the system. The code quality is high and I have no further suggestions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments