Fix comment typo in checkECRRegistry function to clarify _catalog end…

[jnathangreeg]

…point issue

Overview

This PR fixes #

Signed Commits

• Yes, I signed my commits.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated documentation comments for clarity and consistency.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Modified a documentation comment in the registry handler to correct grammar, changing "issues" to "issue" in an ECR-related comment. No functional changes or behavioral modifications introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Comment Update watcher/registryhandler.go	Fixed grammar in ECR-related comment by changing "issues" to "issue".

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A typo caught, a comment mended,
From plural to singular, the fix is pending,
One little word, so small, so bright,
Makes the documentation flow just right!
hop hop ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: fixing a comment typo in the checkECRRegistry function. It directly relates to the documented change in the PR summary.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch gitlab_registry_scan

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents

In `@watcher/registryhandler.go`:
- Line 191: Update the comment "Uses AWS SDK instead of HTTP calls for ECR to
avoid _catalog endpoint issue" so its terminology matches the earlier comment at
Line 162 by using "issues" (plural) instead of "issue"; locate the comment
string in registryhandler.go and change "_catalog endpoint issue" to "_catalog
endpoint issues" to make the wording consistent with the other comment.

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Inconsistent terminology with Line 162.

The comment on Line 162 uses "issues" (plural), while this line now uses "issue" (singular). Both comments describe the same ECR _catalog endpoint problem and should use consistent terminology.

📝 Proposed fix to ensure consistency

If referring to a single specific issue, update Line 162 as well:

-// Use AWS SDK for ECR to avoid _catalog endpoint issues
+// Use AWS SDK for ECR to avoid _catalog endpoint issue

If referring to multiple issues, revert this change:

-// Uses AWS SDK instead of HTTP calls for ECR to avoid _catalog endpoint issue
+// Uses AWS SDK instead of HTTP calls for ECR to avoid _catalog endpoint issues

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	// Uses AWS SDK instead of HTTP calls for ECR to avoid _catalog endpoint issue
	// Uses AWS SDK instead of HTTP calls for ECR to avoid _catalog endpoint issues

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In `@watcher/registryhandler.go` at line 191, Update the comment "Uses AWS SDK
instead of HTTP calls for ECR to avoid _catalog endpoint issue" so its
terminology matches the earlier comment at Line 162 by using "issues" (plural)
instead of "issue"; locate the comment string in registryhandler.go and change
"_catalog endpoint issue" to "_catalog endpoint issues" to make the wording
consistent with the other comment.

[github-actions]

Summary:

• License scan: failure
• Credentials scan: failure
• Vulnerabilities scan: success
• Unit test: success
• Go linting: success