test(rfc0023): red — all seven §5 stubs land, status drafted→red - #353
Conversation
Six #[ignore]d stubs (miner .1/.3/.4/.5/.6, ingester .2); .7 is the bench-hardware criterion discharged by the §9 record. Maintainer keep-going at the RFC 0023 checkpoint is the §5.3 sign-off the drafted→specified→red flips ride on. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 27 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Moves RFC 0023 into the red phase by landing the full set of §5 “red-gate” scenario stubs (ignored todo!() tests) across miner + ingest-path, matching the established workflow used for prior RFC red-stub PRs.
Changes:
- Flip RFC0023 status in the RFC frontmatter from
drafted→red. - Add six ignored miner-level §5 scenario stubs in
ourios-miner(RFC0023.1/.3/.4/.5/.6). - Add the ignored ingest-path round-trip stub in
ourios-ingester(RFC0023.2).
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/rfcs/0023-bounded-template-memory.md | Updates RFC0023 frontmatter status to red. |
| crates/ourios-miner/tests/rfc0023_bounded_memory.rs | Adds ignored §5 scenario stubs for miner-level bounds/invariance/telemetry. |
| crates/ourios-ingester/tests/rfc0023_overflow_roundtrip.rs | Adds ignored §5 scenario stub for ingest-path overflow body round-trip/searchability. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Follows the #344 red-stub pattern: six
#[ignore]dtodo!()stubs (miner-level.1/.3/.4/.5/.6incrates/ourios-miner/tests/rfc0023_bounded_memory.rs, ingest-path.2incrates/ourios-ingester/tests/rfc0023_overflow_roundtrip.rs), each naming its green slice. RFC0023.7 (the 16 GiB HDFS_v2 rerun under 8 GiB peak RSS on the hardware baseline) is a bench criterion discharged by thedocs/benchmarks.md§9 record rather than acargo test, per the RFC's §6.Status rides
drafted → red(throughspecified) on the maintainer's go at the RFC 0023 checkpoint. Defaultcargo teststays green (stubs ignored). Green slice 1 (the threeMinerConfigbounds) follows.🤖 Generated with Claude Code