Stabilize e2e dual-stack test (#936)#939
Merged
istio-testing merged 1 commit intoistio-ecosystem:release-1.26from Jun 23, 2025
Merged
Stabilize e2e dual-stack test (#936)#939istio-testing merged 1 commit intoistio-ecosystem:release-1.26from
istio-testing merged 1 commit intoistio-ecosystem:release-1.26from
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Abramov <mabramov@redhat.com>
Collaborator
|
Hi @unsortedhashsets. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a istio-ecosystem or istio member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-1.26 #939 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 76.85% 77.00% +0.14%
================================================
Files 44 44
Lines 2675 2675
================================================
+ Hits 2056 2060 +4
+ Misses 525 522 -3
+ Partials 94 93 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
fjglira
approved these changes
Jun 23, 2025
openshift-merge-bot bot
pushed a commit
to openshift-service-mesh/sail-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2025
* Stabilize e2e dual-stack test (istio-ecosystem#936) (istio-ecosystem#939) Signed-off-by: Mikhail Abramov <mabramov@redhat.com> * fix IstioRevisionTag uninstall when revision namespace changes (istio-ecosystem#945) Fixes istio-ecosystem#917. This is quite a complex edge case, I'll do my best to explain. If you look at the integration test I wrote (part of this commit), you can follow along. When a tag was created that referenced a revision in ns1, then patched to reference a revision in ns2, we failed to clean up the old helm install in ns1. That almost never causes problems - except in the case where afterwards, you remove all tags, and then create a new one with the same name that is never reconciled. If that tag is deleted, the operator will attempt to uninstall that lingering helm release, which fails, leading the operator to deadlock, and stopping the user from deleting the tag. The only way to get the operator back into a working state would be to manually delete that lingering helm release. That is a pretty significant bug in my opinion. Signed-off-by: Daniel Grimm <dgrimm@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Daniel Grimm <dgrimm@redhat.com> * Expose "Profile" parameter in UI for Istio and IstioCNI (istio-ecosystem#924) (istio-ecosystem#947) During deployment of Istio in ambient mode, the user should be able to set the "profile: ambient" for Istio and IstioCNI resources. Currently, this parameter is hidden from the UI. Turn on the visibility of this parameter in the UI. Signed-off-by: Maxim Babushkin <mbabushk@redhat.com> * [Manual Cherry pick] Pick e2e improve and solving helm issues (istio-ecosystem#948) * Consolidate multicluster operator deploy/cleanup (istio-ecosystem#902) Now that we have `Cleaner` clean up after each test, it makes sense to run this logic once in the suite, rather than after each test (which cleans up its own resources). Signed-off-by: Mike Kolesnik <mkolesni@redhat.com> * Fix typo in the ReportAfterSuite text (istio-ecosystem#911) Signed-off-by: Sridhar Gaddam <sgaddam@redhat.com> * Fix helm issue during e2e test run operator installation (istio-ecosystem#914) * Fix helm issue during e2e test run operator installation Signed-off-by: Francisco H <frherrer@redhat.com> Fix command error Signed-off-by: Francisco H <frherrer@redhat.com> * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Mike Kolesnik <mkolesni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Francisco H <frherrer@redhat.com> * Improves from code review Signed-off-by: Francisco H <frherrer@redhat.com> * Update comment in build and push script Signed-off-by: Francisco H <frherrer@redhat.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Francisco H <frherrer@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Mike Kolesnik <mkolesni@redhat.com> * Consolidate e2e resource creation (istio-ecosystem#931) * Consolidate IstioCNI creation in e2e tests This code is very repetitive and would better live in a common function. Signed-off-by: Mike Kolesnik <mkolesni@redhat.com> * Consolidate Istio creation in e2e tests This code is very repetitive and would better live in a common function. Signed-off-by: Mike Kolesnik <mkolesni@redhat.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Mike Kolesnik <mkolesni@redhat.com> * Use `Eventually` in remote secret generation (istio-ecosystem#921) In this test the secret generation sometimes is attempted before everything is ready, leading to flaky, hard to debug, failures. Using `Eventually` to generate the secret avoids these failures. Fixes: istio-ecosystem#866 Signed-off-by: Mike Kolesnik <mkolesni@redhat.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Mike Kolesnik <mkolesni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Gaddam <sgaddam@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Francisco H <frherrer@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Mike Kolesnik <mkolesni@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Sridhar Gaddam <sgaddam@redhat.com> * Bump to 1.26.2, add Istio 1.26.2 (istio-ecosystem#950) Signed-off-by: Daniel Grimm <dgrimm@redhat.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Mikhail Abramov <mabramov@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Grimm <dgrimm@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Maxim Babushkin <mbabushk@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Kolesnik <mkolesni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Gaddam <sgaddam@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Francisco H <frherrer@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Mikhail Abramov <mabramov@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Istio Automation <istio-testing-bot@google.com> Co-authored-by: Daniel Grimm <dgrimm@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Maxim Babushkin <mbabushk@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Francisco Herrera <frherrer@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Mike Kolesnik <mkolesni@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Sridhar Gaddam <sgaddam@redhat.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Backport of #936
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Related Issue/PR #
Additional information: