-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(shared-utils): Fix addressing in getConfigValue #16358
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (2)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/shared/shared.utils.ts (1)
28-28
: Consider maintaining specific type for ConfigServiceThe change from
ConfigService<SharedModuleConfig>
toConfigService
simplifies the type but might reduce type safety. Consider keeping the specific type to ensure that only valid configuration keys are accessed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/shared/shared.utils.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/shared/shared.utils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/shared/shared.utils.ts (2)
31-31
: Approve the change in configuration value retrievalThe modification to prefix the key with
SharedModuleConfig.
when callingconfigService.get()
is a good practice. It ensures proper namespacing of configuration keys, which can prevent conflicts and improve maintainability.
Line range hint
1-66
: Verify compliance with coding guidelines for libs//* files**While the changes are limited to the
getConfigValue
function, please ensure that the entire file adheres to the following guidelines forlibs/**/*
files:
- Components and hooks should be reusable across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript should be used for defining props and exporting types.
- The code should follow effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
The current implementation seems to comply with these guidelines, but it's worth a final check to ensure full compliance.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16358 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.73% 36.74%
=======================================
Files 6804 6804
Lines 140861 140837 -24
Branches 40118 40109 -9
=======================================
Hits 51751 51751
+ Misses 89110 89086 -24
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 6 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 6 Passed Test Services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
...
Attach a link to issue if relevant
What
Specify what you're trying to achieve
Why
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes