chore(application-system): template-api-modules unit test improvements #16111
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve the addition of unit tests for various utility functions related to applications and accident notifications. New functions have been introduced, including Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
HjorturJ
changed the title
HjorturJ
changed the title
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed Test Services
|
HjorturJ
added
the
deprecated:automerge
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/index.ts (2)
10-10: LGTM: Export enhances module API, consider grouping exportsThe export of
OnBehalfis a good addition to the module's public API, enhancing its functionality and adhering to TypeScript best practices.For improved readability and consistency, consider grouping this export with the other type exports. You could move this line to be part of the
export * from './types'statement or group it with theAccidentNotificationAnswerstype export.
Update Documentation for
accident-notificationModuleThe
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/README.mdcurrently references theaccident-notificationmodule. Please update this documentation to reflect the recent changes to the module's public API to ensure consistency and clarity.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-17: Overall changes look good, consider updating documentationThe changes to this module adhere to the coding guidelines for
libs/**/*files. They enhance reusability, use TypeScript effectively, and maintain good practices for tree-shaking and bundling. The modifications are consistent with the existing code structure.However, as this change expands the module's public API, it's important to ensure that the documentation is updated accordingly. Please verify if any documentation updates are needed:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential documentation files that might need updating # Test: Search for potential documentation files echo "Potential documentation files that might need updating:" fd -e md -e txt . | grep -i 'readme\|doc' # Test: Search for references to the accident-notification module in documentation echo "References to the accident-notification module in documentation:" rg -i 'accident.?notification' -g '*.md' -g '*.txt'Length of output: 20752
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/mapValuesToUserTypes.spec.ts (2)
46-73: LGTM: Good edge case testing for invalid input. Consider adding more specific test cases.This test case effectively verifies the function's behavior when encountering invalid or missing input, ensuring it returns NaN for all fields. This is crucial for robust error handling.
To further improve test coverage, consider adding more specific test cases:
- Test with only one invalid field to ensure it doesn't affect other valid fields.
- Test with empty input object to verify behavior with completely missing data.
Example:
it('should handle mixed valid and invalid input', () => { const answers = { 'individualIncome.contributionsByLegalEntities': 'invalid', 'individualIncome.candidatesOwnContributions': 100, // ... other valid fields }; const result = mapValuesToIndividualtype(answers); expect(result.contributionsByLegalEntities).toBeNaN(); expect(result.candidatesOwnContributions).toBe(100); // ... other assertions }); it('should handle empty input', () => { const result = mapValuesToIndividualtype({}); expect(Object.values(result).every(isNaN)).toBe(true); });These additional tests would provide more granular coverage of different input scenarios.
1-74: Overall, excellent test file with comprehensive coverage.This test file for
mapValuesToIndividualtypefunction demonstrates good adherence to coding guidelines and best practices:
- Proper use of TypeScript for defining test cases and assertions.
- Comprehensive coverage of both happy path and error scenarios.
- Clear and readable test structure using Jest's
describeanditblocks.- Effective use of deep equality checks with
toEqual.The file contributes to the reusability and maintainability of the application template module by ensuring robust testing of the mapping function. It aligns well with the goal of improving unit tests as stated in the PR objectives.
To further enhance the overall testing strategy:
- Consider adding more granular test cases as suggested earlier.
- Ensure that similar comprehensive test coverage is maintained for other related functions in the module.
- If not already in place, consider setting up test coverage reporting to track and maintain high test coverage across the entire module.
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/shared/shared.utils.spec.ts (1)
5-60: LGTM! Consider adding edge case tests.The test suite for
objectToXMLis well-structured and comprehensive, covering various nested object structures. The XML normalization technique for comparison is appropriate.To further improve the test coverage, consider adding tests for edge cases such as:
- Empty objects
- Objects with special characters in values
- Very deeply nested objects
- Objects with array properties containing mixed data types
This will ensure the function handles a wider range of input scenarios correctly.
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/helpers.ts (3)
26-26: Approved use of the new enum ingetIndividualElectionValuesThe change correctly utilizes the new
FinancialElectionIncomeLimitenum, enhancing type safety. For consistency, consider updating theincomeLimittype annotation earlier in the function:const incomeLimit = getValueViaPath(answers, 'election.incomeLimit') as FinancialElectionIncomeLimit;This change would ensure type consistency throughout the function.
39-43: Approved use of the new enum ingetShouldGetFileNameThe changes correctly implement the
FinancialElectionIncomeLimitenum, improving type safety. For improved conciseness, you could simplify the function to:export const getShouldGetFileName = (answers: FormValue): boolean => getValueViaPath(answers, 'election.incomeLimit') === FinancialElectionIncomeLimit.GREATER;This change reduces the function to a single line while maintaining readability and functionality.
78-78: Approved use of the new enum ingetInputThe change correctly utilizes the
FinancialElectionIncomeLimitenum, enhancing type safety. To reduce code duplication, consider refactoring to use thegetIndividualElectionValuesfunction:const { incomeLimit, electionId, clientName, clientPhone, clientEmail, noValueStatement } = getIndividualElectionValues(answers); // Remove the separate noValueStatement assignmentThis change would centralize the
noValueStatementlogic in one place, improving maintainability.libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-cemetery/mappers/mapValuesToUserType.spec.ts (6)
9-61: LGTM! Consider adding more test cases.The test suite for
mapValuesToCemeterytypeis well-structured and covers the basic mapping functionality. It effectively tests the transformation of input values to the expected output format for various financial aspects of cemetery operations.To enhance the test coverage, consider adding the following test cases:
- A case with zero values to ensure proper handling of no financial activity.
- A case with negative values to verify correct handling of losses or liabilities.
- A case with missing input fields to test the function's robustness.
These additional cases will help ensure the function behaves correctly under different scenarios.
63-105: LGTM! Consider expanding test coverage.The test suite for
getNeededCemeteryValueseffectively verifies the extraction and mapping of key information from the provided answers object. It covers essential fields such as operating year, power of attorney, caretaker information, and contact details.To improve the test coverage, consider adding the following test cases:
- A case with missing optional fields to ensure the function handles incomplete data gracefully.
- A case with multiple caretakers of the same role to verify correct handling of duplicate roles.
- A case with special characters or edge case values (e.g., very long strings) in the input fields to test input sanitization.
These additional cases will help ensure the function's robustness across various input scenarios.
107-150: LGTM! Consider adding edge cases.The test suite for
mapContactsAnswersToContactseffectively verifies the correct mapping of different roles to appropriate contact types. It covers the transformation of actor information and contact answers into a structured array of Contact objects.To enhance the test coverage, consider adding the following test cases:
- A case with an empty contacts answer array to ensure proper handling of no additional contacts.
- A case with multiple contacts of the same role to verify correct handling of duplicate roles.
- A case where the actor's national ID matches one of the contacts to test deduplication logic (if applicable).
- A case with unexpected role values to test error handling or default behavior.
These additional cases will help ensure the function's robustness across various input scenarios and edge cases.
152-162: LGTM! Consider adding input validation tests.The test suite for
mapDigitalSigneeeffectively verifies the basic functionality of mapping email and phone to the output object. It covers the happy path scenario with valid inputs.To improve the test coverage and ensure robust input handling, consider adding the following test cases:
- A case with empty string inputs for both email and phone to test handling of missing information.
- A case with invalid email format to verify email validation (if implemented).
- A case with non-numeric phone number to test phone number validation (if implemented).
- A case with very long input strings to test any potential length restrictions.
These additional cases will help ensure the function handles various input scenarios correctly and maintains data integrity.
1-7: Consider using named imports for better clarity.The overall structure of the test file is well-organized and follows Jest testing conventions. However, the use of a wildcard import for the mapper module might make it less clear which specific functions are being tested.
Consider replacing the wildcard import with named imports for better clarity:
import { mapValuesToCemeterytype, getNeededCemeteryValues, mapContactsAnswersToContacts, mapDigitalSignee } from './mapValuesToUserType'This change will make it immediately clear which functions are being tested and improve code readability.
1-163: Overall, well-structured and comprehensive tests. Consider enhancing edge case coverage.The test file provides a solid foundation for testing the
mapValuesToUserTypemodule. It covers all major functions with clear, well-structured test cases that verify the basic functionality. The use of TypeScript for defining types aligns with the coding guidelines for libs/**/* files.To further improve the test suite:
- Add more diverse test cases for each function to cover edge cases and potential error scenarios.
- Consider implementing property-based testing for functions that handle various input types and ranges.
- Ensure that all exported types and functions from the
mapValuesToUserTypemodule are covered by tests.These enhancements will contribute to a more robust and comprehensive test suite, increasing confidence in the module's reliability across various scenarios.
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/helpers.spec.ts (2)
72-173: LGTM: Comprehensive test for getInput with a suggestionThe test for
getInputis thorough and well-structured. It effectively validates both the input mapping and logger information generation for a complex scenario with multiple input fields.Consider adding a test case for the scenario where
actoris undefined to ensure full coverage of thegetActorContactlogic withingetInput. This can be achieved by adding anotheritblock withactorset toundefined.
1-174: Overall, excellent test coverage with a suggestion for improvementThe test file is well-structured and provides comprehensive coverage for the helper functions. Each function is tested thoroughly with multiple scenarios, adhering to good testing practices.
To further enhance the test suite, consider adding tests for error handling scenarios. For example, test how the functions behave when provided with invalid inputs or when external dependencies fail. This will ensure robustness and help catch potential edge cases.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/shared/shared.utils.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-cemetery/mappers/mapValuesToUserType.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/helpers.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/helpers.ts (4 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/mapValuesToUserTypes.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (7)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/shared/shared.utils.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-cemetery/mappers/mapValuesToUserType.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/helpers.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/helpers.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/mapValuesToUserTypes.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Biome
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
[error] 38-38: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 143-143: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (11)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/index.ts (1)
2-2: LGTM: Import change enhances type safety and reusabilityThe addition of
OnBehalfto the import statement is a good practice. It adheres to TypeScript usage guidelines and promotes reusability by making the type available in this module.libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/mapValuesToUserTypes.spec.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct and follows best practices.The import statement correctly imports the
mapValuesToIndividualtypefunction from the relative path './mapValuesToUserTypes'. This follows TypeScript best practices and ensures the function is available for testing.
3-3: LGTM: Test suite structure is well-organized and follows Jest best practices.The test suite is properly structured using a
describeblock to group related tests, and individualitblocks for each test case. This organization provides clear context and separation of test scenarios, enhancing readability and maintainability.Also applies to: 4-4, 46-46
4-44: LGTM: Comprehensive test case for correct value mapping.This test case thoroughly checks the
mapValuesToIndividualtypefunction's behavior with a complete set of input values. It verifies that all fields are correctly mapped to their corresponding output keys. The use oftoEqualfor deep equality checking is appropriate for this scenario.The test case adheres to TypeScript best practices and provides effective coverage of the function's expected behavior.
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/shared/shared.utils.spec.ts (2)
62-86: Excellent test coverage forgetConfigValue!The test suite for
getConfigValueis well-implemented, covering both successful retrieval and error handling scenarios. The use of jest.spyOn for mocking the ConfigService is appropriate, and the error message is specific and helpful.The tests ensure type safety by using
as unknown as ConfigService<BaseTemplateAPIModuleConfig>for the mock object, which aligns well with TypeScript best practices.
1-86: Great job on the unit tests for shared utility functions!This new file demonstrates excellent adherence to best practices for unit testing and TypeScript usage. The tests are comprehensive, well-structured, and cover important scenarios for both
objectToXMLandgetConfigValuefunctions.The file aligns well with the coding guidelines for
libs/**/*:
- It contributes to the reusability of components across different NextJS apps by testing shared utility functions.
- TypeScript is used effectively for type definitions, especially in mocking the ConfigService.
- The focused nature of these tests supports effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
Keep up the good work in maintaining high-quality, well-tested shared utilities!
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/helpers.ts (2)
12-15: Excellent addition of theFinancialElectionIncomeLimitenumThe introduction of this enum enhances type safety and code clarity by replacing string literals. It's well-named and properly exported for use across the module.
Line range hint
1-110: Overall assessment: Positive improvements to type safety and code clarityThe introduction of the
FinancialElectionIncomeLimitenum and its consistent use throughout the file significantly enhances type safety and code clarity. The changes are well-implemented and maintain the existing logic while improving the code structure.A few minor suggestions have been made for further refinement:
- Updating type annotations for consistency
- Simplifying the
getShouldGetFileNamefunction- Reducing code duplication in the
getInputfunctionThese suggestions are not critical but could further improve the code quality. Great job on these improvements!
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/helpers.spec.ts (3)
5-32: LGTM: Comprehensive test for getIndividualElectionValuesThe test for
getIndividualElectionValuesis well-structured and covers both income limit scenarios. It effectively validates the mapping logic and includes all necessary fields in the expected result structure.
34-47: LGTM: Thorough test for getShouldGetFileNameThe test for
getShouldGetFileNameis well-implemented, covering both income limit scenarios. It effectively validates the logic for determining whether a file name should be retrieved based on the income limit provided in the answers.
49-70: LGTM: Well-structured test for getActorContactThe test for
getActorContactis comprehensive, covering both scenarios where the actor should and should not be defined. It effectively validates the logic for returning actor contact information and includes all necessary fields in the expected result structure.
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…ication-system-test-improvements
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/FormOverview/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/workMachineSubSection.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/workMachine.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/FormOverview/index.tsx
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/AccidentNotificationForm/aboutTheAccidentSection/workMachineSubSection.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/messages/workMachine.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Biome
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
[error] 38-38: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 143-143: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (2)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (2)
1-24: LGTM: Imports and type definitions are well-organizedThe imports are comprehensive and properly structured, covering all necessary types, enums, and utilities for the tests. Good job on maintaining a clean and organized import section.
1-361: Overall, well-structured and comprehensive test suite with room for improvementsThis test file provides a thorough coverage of the accident notification utility functions. It demonstrates good practices such as:
- Comprehensive test cases covering various scenarios
- Use of parameterized tests with
it.each- Consistent test data through helper functions
Main areas for improvement:
- Replace
deleteoperator usage for better performance- Extract magic strings and numbers into named constants
- Consider a more robust XML validation approach
- Enhance type safety in mock object creation and helper functions
- Increase flexibility of helper functions
Addressing these points will further improve the maintainability, reliability, and performance of your test suite.
🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 38-38: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 143-143: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (3)
26-176: Well-structured and comprehensive tests forapplicationAnswersToXml.The test suite covers a wide range of scenarios, including different accident types and notification contexts. The use of
it.eachfor parameterized testing is an excellent approach to reduce code duplication and improve test maintainability.Consider replacing
deleteoperator for better performance.On lines 38 and 143, the
deleteoperator is used to remove properties from objects. While this works, it can negatively impact performance as it changes the object's shape.Consider using
undefinedassignment instead. Here's how you can refactor these lines:- delete answers['companyInfo'] + answers['companyInfo'] = undefinedThis change will achieve the same result without the potential performance impact of the
deleteoperator.🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 38-38: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 143-143: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
178-208: Tests forgetApplicationDocumentIdcover key scenarios.The tests appropriately check both successful retrieval and error handling cases for the
getApplicationDocumentIdfunction.Consider improving type safety for mock objects.
The current approach uses type assertion (
as unknown as Application) to create mockApplicationobjects. This bypasses TypeScript's type checking and could potentially lead to errors if the mock doesn't match the actualApplicationtype.Consider creating a helper function to generate properly typed mock
Applicationobjects. For example:function createMockApplication(documentId?: number): Application { return { externalData: { submitApplication: { data: documentId ? { documentId, sentDocuments: ['hello', 'there'] } : undefined, }, }, } as Application; } // Usage in tests const application = createMockApplication(5555);This approach improves type safety and makes it easier to create consistent mock objects across tests.
210-361: Helper functions provide consistent test data.The
getDefaultAttachmentsandgetFullBasicAnswersfunctions are useful for providing consistent test data across multiple test cases.Consider enhancing helper functions for better type safety and flexibility.
While the current implementation works, there are opportunities for improvement:
- Add explicit return types to both functions for better type safety.
- Consider making these functions more flexible by accepting parameters to customize the returned data.
Here's an example of how you could refactor these functions:
const getDefaultAttachments = (overrides: Partial<AccidentNotificationAttachment>[] = []): AccidentNotificationAttachment[] => { const defaultAttachments: AccidentNotificationAttachment[] = [ // ... your default attachments here ]; return defaultAttachments.map((attachment, index) => ({ ...attachment, ...overrides[index], })); }; const getFullBasicAnswers = (overrides: Partial<AccidentNotificationAnswers> = {}): AccidentNotificationAnswers => { const defaultAnswers: AccidentNotificationAnswers = { // ... your default answers here }; return { ...defaultAnswers, ...overrides, }; };This approach allows for more flexible test data creation while maintaining type safety.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Biome
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
[error] 38-38: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 143-143: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (2)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (2)
1-25: Imports and type definitions look good.The imports are well-organized and include all necessary types and enums for the tests. This setup provides a solid foundation for the test suite.
1-361: Overall, well-structured and comprehensive test suite.This test file provides thorough coverage for the accident notification utility functions. The use of parameterized tests, consistent test data, and coverage of various scenarios is commendable. The suggestions provided earlier can help further improve the code quality, type safety, and maintainability of these tests.
🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 38-38: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 143-143: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (1)
1-24: Consider removing unused importsSome of the imported types and enums appear to be unused in this file. To improve code clarity and potentially reduce bundle size, consider removing any imports that are not directly used in the tests. However, before removing them, please verify that they are not required for type inference or used indirectly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Biome
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
[error] 38-38: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 143-143: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (2)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (2)
178-201: Well-structured tests forgetApplicationDocumentIdThe tests for
getApplicationDocumentIdare well-structured and cover both success and error scenarios. The use of a helper functioncreateMockPartialApplicationimproves test readability and maintainability. Good job on using the correct assertion method for the error case.
1-355: Overall well-structured and comprehensive testsThe test suite for the accident notification utilities is well-structured and covers a wide range of scenarios. The use of parameterized tests and helper functions contributes to the maintainability of the tests. With the suggested improvements (more robust XML validation, explicit return types, and addressing the
deleteoperator usage), these tests will be even more robust and maintainable.Great job on writing thorough tests! They will significantly contribute to the reliability of the accident notification system.
🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 38-38: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 143-143: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: HjorturJ PR: island-is/island.is#16111 File: libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts:210-361 Timestamp: 2024-09-25T13:23:39.010Z Learning: In `accident-notification.utils.spec.ts`, the helper functions `getDefaultAttachments` and `getFullBasicAnswers` should not be modified to accept parameters for customizing returned data.libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: HjorturJ PR: island-is/island.is#16111 File: libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts:210-361 Timestamp: 2024-09-25T13:23:39.010Z Learning: In `accident-notification.utils.spec.ts`, the helper functions `getDefaultAttachments` and `getFullBasicAnswers` should not be modified to accept parameters for customizing returned data.
Biome
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
[error] 38-38: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 143-143: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (4)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts (4)
1-25: Imports and setup look goodThe imports are comprehensive and include all necessary types, enums, and utility functions for the tests. No issues or improvements needed in this section.
26-176: Well-structured and comprehensive testsThe tests for
applicationAnswersToXmlare well-structured and cover multiple scenarios usingit.each. This approach reduces code duplication and ensures thorough testing of different accident types and notification contexts. The use of helper functions for generating test data enhances maintainability.🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 38-38: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 143-143: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
178-205: Well-implemented tests forgetApplicationDocumentIdThe tests for
getApplicationDocumentIdare well-implemented:
- The use of a helper function
createMockPartialApplicationfor creating mock data is a good practice.- Both success and error scenarios are covered.
- The error case correctly uses
expect(() => ...).toThrowError()for testing thrown errors.Good job on implementing these tests thoroughly.
1-358: Overall excellent test implementationThis file demonstrates a comprehensive and well-structured set of tests for the accident notification utility functions. The use of helper functions,
it.eachfor multiple scenarios, and thorough coverage of different cases are commendable. The minor suggestions for improvement (replacingdeleteoperator, extracting magic strings, and adding explicit return types) will further enhance the already high-quality test suite.Great job on implementing these tests!
🧰 Tools
Biome
[error] 38-38: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 143-143: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.ts (1)
16-16: Typo fix approved, but function name might be misleading.The correction of the property name from
isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstituetoisRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstituteis a good fix. It ensures that the correct property is being accessed, which is crucial for the function's reliability.However, I noticed that the function name
isInjuredAndRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitutesuggests it checks for both "injured" and "representative" status, but the implementation only seems to check for the "representative" part.Consider either:
- Renaming the function to
isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstituteif it's not meant to check for "injured" status, or- Updating the implementation to also check for "injured" status if that's the intended behavior.
Example of potential implementation if both checks are needed:
export const isInjuredAndRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute = ( formValue: FormValue, ) => { return ( formValue.isInjured?.toString() === YES && formValue.isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute?.toString() === YES ) }Please choose the option that best aligns with the intended functionality of this utility.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.spec.ts (1)
12-36: LGTM: Comprehensive test suite forisRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.The test suite covers the main scenarios effectively with clear descriptions. Good use of the
FormValuetype andWhoIsTheNotificationForEnumfor test data.Consider adding a test case for an invalid
whoIsTheNotificationForvalue to ensure robust error handling:it('should return false for invalid whoIsTheNotificationFor value', () => { const invalidRepresentative: FormValue = { whoIsTheNotificationFor: { answer: 'INVALID_VALUE' as WhoIsTheNotificationForEnum, }, }; expect(isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute(invalidRepresentative)).toEqual(false); });libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
120-129: Remove duplicate export and LGTM for new exportsThe new exports contribute to the module's public API, which is good. However, there's a duplicate export that should be removed:
Please remove the duplicate export on line 125:
export * from './isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute' - export * from './isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute' export * from './isFatalAccident' export * from './isReportingBehalfOfSelf' export * from './isOfWorkTypeAccident' export * from './shouldRequestReview' export * from './isUniqueAssignee'The other new exports look good and enhance the module's functionality.
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (1)
32-94: Comprehensive test coverage forgetApplicantNameThe new tests for
getApplicantNamesignificantly improve coverage by checking various scenarios and data sources. This aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing unit tests.However, there's a minor duplication in the test cases for identity and person data (lines 97-131). Consider removing these duplicated tests to maintain a DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) codebase.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (4 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/FormOverview/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/hasMissingDocuments.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isReportingBehalfOfSelf.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/FormOverview/index.tsx
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/hasMissingDocuments.spec.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.spec.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isReportingBehalfOfSelf.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🪛 Biome
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts
[error] 187-187: Expected an expression but instead found '<<'.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 187-187: Expected an expression but instead found '<<'.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 188-188: expected
>but instead founditRemove it
(parse)
[error] 198-201: Expected a statement but instead found '})
describe('getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationString', () =>'.
Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 211-211: Expected an expression but instead found '==='.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 211-211: Expected an expression but instead found '='.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 202-211: Invalid assignment to
{ typeid: 'test', count: 1, draft: 1, inprogress: 1, completed: 1, rejected: 1, approved: 1, } ======This expression cannot be assigned to
(parse)
[error] 212-214: Expected a statement but instead found '>>>>>>> 698c51d
it('Should return the translated name of the application statistics when defined with a string', () =>'.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 213-213: numbers cannot be followed by identifiers directly after
an identifier cannot appear here
(parse)
[error] 224-226: Expected a statement but instead found ')
it('Should return the translated name of the application statistics when defined with a function', () =>'.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 236-238: Expected a statement but instead found ')
it('Should return the translated name of the application statistics when defined with a function that returns an object', () =>'.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 251-251: Expected a statement but instead found ')'.
Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 202-252: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 214-224: This block statement doesn't serve any purpose and can be safely removed.
Standalone block statements without any block-level declarations are redundant in JavaScript and can be removed to simplify the code.
Safe fix: Remove redundant block.(lint/complexity/noUselessLoneBlockStatements)
[error] 226-236: This block statement doesn't serve any purpose and can be safely removed.
Standalone block statements without any block-level declarations are redundant in JavaScript and can be removed to simplify the code.
Safe fix: Remove redundant block.(lint/complexity/noUselessLoneBlockStatements)
[error] 238-251: This block statement doesn't serve any purpose and can be safely removed.
Standalone block statements without any block-level declarations are redundant in JavaScript and can be removed to simplify the code.
Safe fix: Remove redundant block.(lint/complexity/noUselessLoneBlockStatements)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-16: Overall, the file adheres to coding guidelines and best practices.This utility file demonstrates good adherence to the coding guidelines for the
libsdirectory:
- The functions are likely reusable across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript is used effectively for defining types and function parameters.
- The code structure supports effective tree-shaking and bundling.
The file maintains a clean and consistent style, with pure functions that enhance testability and reliability. The recent change corrects a typo, improving the code's accuracy.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.spec.ts (2)
1-10: LGTM: Imports and constants are well-structured.The imports are appropriate for the tests, and the
emptyObjectconstant is a good practice for reuse in multiple tests.
1-66: LGTM: Adherence to coding guidelines forlibs/**/*.The code follows the guidelines for the
libsdirectory:
- It uses TypeScript for defining types (e.g.,
FormValue).- The utility functions being tested are reusable across different NextJS apps.
- The code structure supports effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-129: LGTM: Adherence to coding guidelinesThe code adheres to the coding guidelines for
libs/**/*files:
- The utility functions are reusable across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript is used effectively for defining types and function signatures.
- The use of named exports allows for effective tree-shaking and bundling.
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM: New import added forgetApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringThe addition of this import aligns with the PR objectives of improving unit tests by introducing new functionality to be tested.
12-95: Improved test structure and organizationThe restructuring of existing tests into nested
describeblocks enhances the readability and maintainability of the test suite. This change aligns with best practices for organizing unit tests.
...ation/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
97-132: Remove duplicate tests forgetApplicantNameThese two test cases are exact duplicates of the tests already present within the
getApplicantNamedescribe block (lines 50-66 and 68-84). To maintain a clean and efficient test suite, please remove these redundant tests.Apply this diff to remove the duplicate tests:
- it('Should return name of the applicant when identity external data is defined', () => { - expect( - getApplicantName( - createApplication({ - externalData: { - identity: { - data: { - name: 'Test User', - }, - date: new Date(), - status: 'success', - }, - }, - }), - ), - ).toEqual('Test User') - }) - - it('Should return name of the applicant when person external data is defined', () => { - expect( - getApplicantName( - createApplication({ - externalData: { - person: { - data: { - fullname: 'Test User', - }, - date: new Date(), - status: 'success', - }, - }, - }), - ), - ).toEqual('Test User') - })
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/hasMissingDocuments.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/hasMissingDocuments.spec.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.spec.ts
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (5)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (5)
4-4: LGTM: New import added correctlyThe new import for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringis correctly added and aligns with the new tests introduced in this file.
12-94: LGTM: Improved test structureThe restructuring of existing tests into nested
describeblocks enhances the organization and readability of the test suite. This change makes it easier to understand the grouping of related tests and improves maintainability.
186-234: LGTM: Comprehensive tests forgetApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringThe new tests for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringare well-structured and cover various scenarios:
- When the application name is defined as a string
- When the application name is defined as a function
- When the application name is defined as a function returning an object
The
applicationStatisticsobject is correctly defined once and reused across tests, adhering to the DRY principle. These tests provide good coverage for the new functionality.
Line range hint
1-234: Merge conflicts resolvedThe merge conflicts mentioned in the previous review have been successfully resolved. There are no remaining conflict markers in the code.
Line range hint
1-234: Changes align with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file align well with the PR objectives of improving unit tests within the application system code base. The changes include:
- Adding new tests for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationString- Restructuring existing tests into nested
describeblocks for better organization- Improving test coverage for
getApplicationNameTranslationStringThese enhancements contribute to a more robust and maintainable test suite, which will help developers avoid unintended modifications in the future.
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (4)
Line range hint
97-132: Remove duplicate tests forgetApplicantNameThe tests on lines 97-132 are duplicates of the tests already present in the
getApplicantNamedescribe block (lines 50-66 and 68-84). To maintain a clean and efficient test suite, these duplicate tests should be removed.Please remove the following duplicate tests:
- Test starting at line 97: "Should return name of the applicant when identity external data is defined"
- Test starting at line 115: "Should return name of the applicant when person external data is defined"
134-184: LGTM: Improved test coverage and descriptionThe changes to the
getApplicationNameTranslationStringtests are good:
- The new test case (lines 155-172) improves coverage by checking the application name based on the applicant's age.
- The test description update on line 155 addresses the inconsistency noted in a previous review.
These changes enhance the test suite's effectiveness and clarity.
Consider adding a test case for the scenario where the applicant's age is below the threshold (e.g., 19) to ensure both branches of the conditional logic are covered.
186-234: LGTM: Comprehensive tests forgetApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringThe new tests for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringprovide good coverage for different scenarios:
- When the name is defined as a string (lines 196-206)
- When the name is defined as a function (lines 208-218)
- When the name is defined as a function returning an object (lines 220-233)
These tests effectively validate the function's behavior across various use cases.
To improve code maintainability and adhere to the DRY principle, consider refactoring the
applicationStatisticsobject. Define it once at the beginning of the describe block and reuse it across all test cases. For example:describe('getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationString', () => { const applicationStatistics = { typeid: 'test', count: 1, draft: 1, inprogress: 1, completed: 1, rejected: 1, approved: 1, } // ... existing test cases using the shared applicationStatistics object })This refactoring will reduce duplication and make future updates to the
applicationStatisticsobject easier to manage.
Line range hint
1-234: Overall improvements with one action itemThe changes to this file have significantly improved the test suite:
- Better organization of tests using describe blocks
- Enhanced test coverage for
getApplicationNameTranslationString- New comprehensive tests for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringThese improvements contribute to a more robust and maintainable test suite.
The main action item is to remove the duplicate tests for
getApplicantName(lines 97-132) as mentioned in a previous comment. Once this is addressed, the file will be in excellent shape.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (3)
4-4: LGTM: New import added correctlyThe new import for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringis correctly added and aligns with the new tests introduced in this file.
12-94: LGTM: Improved test structureThe restructuring of existing tests for
getPaymentStatusForAdminandgetApplicantNameinto separate describe blocks enhances the organization and readability of the test suite. This change follows best practices for test structure.
4-4: Verify implementation ofgetApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringWhile the tests for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringhave been added, it's important to ensure that the function itself is correctly implemented in the main codebase.Run the following script to verify the function implementation:
This script will help confirm that the function is properly defined and exported in the correct location.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (3)
32-94: Excellent addition of comprehensive tests forgetApplicantNameThe new tests for
getApplicantNamesignificantly improve coverage by handling different data sources (nationalRegistry, identity, and person) and edge cases. This is a great improvement to the test suite.Consider adding one more test case:
it('Should prioritize nationalRegistry over other data sources when multiple are present', () => { expect( getApplicantName( createApplication({ externalData: { nationalRegistry: { data: { fullName: 'National Registry Name' }, date: new Date(), status: 'success', }, identity: { data: { name: 'Identity Name' }, date: new Date(), status: 'success', }, person: { data: { fullname: 'Person Name' }, date: new Date(), status: 'success', }, }, }), ), ).toEqual('National Registry Name') })This test would ensure that the function correctly prioritizes data sources when multiple are present.
97-147: Good improvements togetApplicationNameTranslationStringtestsThe addition of a new test case for age-based application naming and the clarification of the static string test description enhance the test coverage and clarity.
To further improve the tests:
- Consider adding a test case for an edge case, such as when the age is exactly at the threshold:
it('Should handle the age threshold edge case correctly', () => { expect( getApplicationNameTranslationString( createApplicationTemplate({ name: (application) => Number(application.answers.age) >= 20 ? 'Adult Application' : 'Child Application', }), createApplication({ answers: { age: 19, }, }), (message) => message as any, ), ).toEqual('Child Application') })
- Add a test case for when the
namefunction returnsundefinedornullto ensure proper error handling.
149-197: Excellent addition of tests forgetApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringThe new test cases for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringare comprehensive and cover various scenarios, including string, function, and function returning object cases. The use of a sharedapplicationStatisticsobject is a good practice to reduce duplication.To further enhance these tests:
- Consider adding a test case for error handling, such as when the
namefunction throws an error or returns an unexpected type.- Add a test case where the
formatMessagefunction is more complex, to ensure it's being used correctly in all scenarios.Example:
it('Should handle errors in the name function gracefully', () => { expect(() => getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationString( createApplicationTemplate({ name: () => { throw new Error('Name function error'); }, }), applicationStatistics, (message) => message as string, ), ).toThrow('Name function error') })
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (4)
4-4: LGTM: New import added correctlyThe new import for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringis correctly added and aligns with the new tests introduced in this file.
12-13: Great job on improving test structure!The restructuring of existing tests into nested
describeblocks enhances the organization and readability of the test suite. This change follows best practices for test structure and makes it easier to understand the purpose of each test group.Also applies to: 31-31
12-199: Well-structured and organized test fileThe overall structure of the test file is excellent. The use of nested
describeblocks and logical grouping of tests by function enhances readability and maintainability. This organization will make it easier for developers to understand and maintain the tests in the future.
1-199: Excellent improvements to test coverage and organizationOverall, this PR significantly enhances the test suite for application utility functions. The additions and restructuring improve code coverage, readability, and maintainability. Key improvements include:
- Comprehensive tests for
getApplicantNamecovering various data sources.- Enhanced tests for
getApplicationNameTranslationStringwith dynamic naming scenarios.- New tests for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringcovering different use cases.- Improved overall structure with nested
describeblocks.The changes adhere to TypeScript and Jest best practices, making the test suite more robust and easier to maintain. Great job on these improvements!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (1)
32-94: Excellent addition of comprehensive tests forgetApplicantNameThe new tests for
getApplicantNamesignificantly improve coverage by handling different data sources (nationalRegistry, identity, and person) and edge cases. This ensures the function behaves correctly across various scenarios.Suggestion for further improvement:
Consider adding a test case where multiple external data sources are present to verify the priority order of name retrieval.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (6)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/modules/application/utils/applicationUtils.spec.ts (6)
4-4: LGTM: New import added correctlyThe new import for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringis correctly added and aligns with the new tests introduced in this file.
12-13: Great job on improving test structure!The restructuring of existing tests into nested
describeblocks enhances the organization and readability of the test suite. This follows best practices for structuring unit tests and makes it easier to understand the purpose of each test group.Also applies to: 31-31
118-147: Improved test coverage forgetApplicationNameTranslationStringThe addition of a new test case for age-based application naming enhances the coverage of the
getApplicationNameTranslationStringfunction. The updated test description for the static string case is now more accurate and clear.The test description update addresses the issue raised in a previous review comment about the inconsistency between the test description and its implementation.
149-197: Well-structured tests forgetApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringThe new tests for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringare comprehensive and well-organized. They cover various scenarios including string names, function names, and functions returning objects. The use of a sharedapplicationStatisticsobject at the beginning of the describe block reduces duplication, addressing a suggestion from a previous review.The implementation of a shared
applicationStatisticsobject addresses the suggestion from a previous review comment about eliminating duplication.
1-198: Excellent overall test structure and organizationThe test file is well-organized with clear describe blocks for each function, making it easy to read and maintain. The logical grouping of tests and coverage of various scenarios demonstrate adherence to best practices in unit testing.
1-198: Summary: High-quality improvements to test coverage and organizationOverall, the changes to this file significantly enhance the test suite for application utility functions. The additions and restructuring improve code coverage, readability, and maintainability. The use of TypeScript and adherence to NextJS best practices is evident throughout the file.
Key improvements:
- Better organization with nested describe blocks
- Comprehensive tests for
getApplicantNamecovering various data sources- Enhanced tests for
getApplicationNameTranslationString- Well-structured new tests for
getApplicationStatisticsNameTranslationStringThese changes will contribute to a more robust and reliable application system.
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...es/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/helpers.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...es/src/lib/modules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/helpers.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...dules/templates/financial-statement-individual-election/mappers/mapValuesToUserTypes.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/hasMissingDocuments.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/hasReceivedConfirmation.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/index.spec.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…om:island-is/island.is into chore/application-system-test-improvements
...
Issue link:
https://app.asana.com/0/1207402031871459/1208203936175038/f
What
Address some low hanging fruit when it comes to unit tests in the application system code base.
Why
So it will be easier for devs to not make unintended changes in the future
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes