-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(accident-notification): connect new api for accident-notification #15420
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 99 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 97 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (3) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 18
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (19)
libs/clients/icelandic-health-insurance/rights-portal/src/lib/providers.ts (1)
28-28
: LGTM: AccidentreportsApi correctly added to exportedApis.The
AccidentreportsApi
is successfully added to theexportedApis
array, ensuring it will be provided with the shared configuration like other APIs.Consider maintaining alphabetical order in the
exportedApis
array for consistency. You might want to moveAccidentreportsApi
to the beginning of the list:export const exportedApis = [ + AccidentreportsApi, TherapyApi, AidsandnutritionApi, DentistApi, HealthcenterApi, EhicApi, InsurancestatementsApi, DrugApi, OverviewApi, PaymentsCopaymentApi, PaymentsOverviewApi, - AccidentreportsApi, ].map((Api) => ({libs/clients/icelandic-health-insurance/rights-portal/src/clientConfig.json (5)
2419-2452
: Improved accident reporting structureThe changes to the AccidentDTO schema enhance the accident reporting process by requiring more specific information. The addition of 'symptoms' and 'dateTimeOfDoctorVisit' fields will provide valuable data for assessment and analysis.
Consider adding a field for 'severity' to further categorize accidents and prioritize responses.
{ "type": "object", "properties": { // ... existing properties ... + "severity": { + "type": "string", + "enum": ["minor", "moderate", "severe", "critical"], + "description": "The severity level of the accident" + } } }
Line range hint
2679-2693
: Reconsider making 'phone' optional in InjuredDTOWhile adding 'occupation' is valuable for work-related accident analysis, making 'phone' optional might hinder immediate contact in urgent situations.
Consider keeping both 'phone' and 'occupation' as required fields to ensure comprehensive data collection and maintain the ability for quick communication.
{ "type": "object", "properties": { // ... existing properties ... "occupation": { "type": "string", "nullable": true }, "phone": { - "type": "string", - "nullable": true + "type": "string" } }, "required": [ "email", "name", "nationalId", + "phone", + "occupation" ] }
Line range hint
2577-2592
: Improved accountability in accident report confirmationsThe addition of 'accepted' and 'party' as required fields in the AccidentReportConfirmationDTO enhances accountability and clarity in the confirmation process. This change will help track the status of each report more effectively.
Consider adding a 'timestamp' field to record when the confirmation was made, further improving the audit trail.
{ "type": "object", "properties": { // ... existing properties ... + "timestamp": { + "type": "string", + "format": "date-time", + "description": "The date and time when the confirmation was made" + } }, "required": [ "accepted", "party", + "timestamp" ] }
4288-4308
: Enhanced error handling and tracing in InsuranceStatementApplicationResponseDTOThe addition of 'requestId', 'errors', and 'errorStack' fields significantly improves the ability to track and debug issues in insurance statement applications. This will lead to better error resolution and system reliability.
However, be cautious about exposing detailed error information, especially in production environments. Consider implementing a mechanism to control the verbosity of error details based on the environment or user role.
Implement a configuration setting to control error detail exposure:
{ "errorHandling": { "exposeDetailedErrors": false, "logDetailedErrors": true } }Use this configuration to determine whether to include the 'errorStack' in the response or just log it internally.
Line range hint
3753-3801
: Improved drug certificate status trackingThe addition of the 'status' field with the DrugCertificateStatusEnum provides a clear and consistent way to represent the state of drug certificates. This enhancement will improve the management and tracking of drug certificates throughout their lifecycle.
To further improve clarity, consider adding descriptions for each enum value in the OpenAPI specification. This will help API consumers understand the meaning of each status.
Enhance the DrugCertificateStatusEnum definition:
"DrugCertificateStatusEnum": { "enum": [0, 1, 2, 3], "type": "integer", "format": "int32", "description": "The status of the drug certificate", "x-enum-descriptions": [ "Pending", "Approved", "Rejected", "Expired" ] }This addition provides clear descriptions for each status value, improving API documentation and usability.
libs/clients/icelandic-health-insurance/rights-portal/src/index.ts (1)
21-36
: Ensure exports align with effective tree-shaking practicesExporting numerous entities may impact bundling and tree-shaking effectiveness. Please review whether all exported items are necessary for external use or if some can remain internal to minimize bundle size.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/types/index.ts (2)
181-236
: Evaluate the use of 'V2' suffix in type names for better maintainabilityAppending
V2
to type names likeApplicantV2
andAccidentDetailsV2
may not scale well as the application evolves. Consider alternative versioning strategies, such as using namespaces or versioning within the API routes, to manage different versions of types without polluting the type names.
181-236
: Clarify the necessity of 'string | null' in optional propertiesSince the properties are already optional (using
?
), includingnull
in the type (string | null
) may be redundant unless there's a need to distinguish betweenundefined
andnull
. If differentiating between these is important due to external API requirements or data handling, consider adding comments to explain the rationale.libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (3)
45-52
: Standardize naming ofaccidentReportsApi
There is an inconsistency in naming between the class property and the method. The class property is named
accidentReportsApi
, but the method is namedaccidentsReportsApiWithAuth
(note the additional 's' inaccidents
).Apply this diff to fix the method name for consistency:
- private accidentsReportsApiWithAuth(auth: Auth) { + private accidentReportsApiWithAuth(auth: Auth) { return this.accidentReportsApi.withMiddleware(new AuthMiddleware(auth)) }
143-149
: Consider removing commented-out codeThe code related to sending new attachments is commented out. If this functionality is no longer needed, consider removing the commented-out code to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.
163-181
: Remove unusedsendAttachment
methodThe
sendAttachment
method is entirely commented out. If it's no longer required, it's better to remove it to reduce clutter and improve code readability.libs/api/domains/application/src/lib/application.service.ts (2)
Line range hint
131-136
: Consider refactoring repeated destructuring and API call patternsThe methods
update
,addAttachment
,deleteAttachment
,updateExternalData
,generatePdfPresignedUrl
,requestFileSignature
, anduploadSignedFile
all follow a similar pattern:
- Destructuring
id
frominput
- Spreading the remaining properties into a DTO object
- Calling the corresponding API method with
id
and the DTOTo reduce code duplication and improve maintainability, consider creating a helper function or abstraction that encapsulates this pattern.
Also applies to: 138-143, 145-150, 152-158, 170-176, 178-184
Line range hint
186-192
: Inconsistent method naming: 'Url' vs 'URL'The method names
presignedUrl
andattachmentPresignedURL
use different casing forUrl
/URL
. For consistency and readability, consider standardizing the casing. For example, choose eitherUrl
orURL
consistently across method names.Also applies to: 194-200
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (5)
Line range hint
33-42
: Consider adding validation for 'phoneNumber' field in 'representative' schema.The
phoneNumber
field is defined as an optional string without validation. To ensure data integrity, consider adding validation to check that the phone number is in the expected format.Apply this diff to add validation:
const representative = z.object({ name: z.string().refine((x) => x.trim().length > 0, { params: error.invalidValue, }), nationalId: z.string().refine((x) => (x ? kennitala.isPerson(x) : false), { params: error.invalidValue, }), email: z.string().email(), - phoneNumber: z.string().optional(), + phoneNumber: z + .string() + .optional() + .refine((x) => (x ? isValidPhoneNumber(x) : true), { + params: error.invalidValue, + }), })Note: You'll need to implement or import an
isValidPhoneNumber
function as appropriate.
148-163
: Consider adding validation for 'phoneNumber' field in 'injuredPersonInformation' schema.In the
injuredPersonInformation
schema, thephoneNumber
field is optional and defined as a string without validation. To ensure data integrity, consider adding validation to check that the phone number is in the expected format.Apply this diff to add validation:
phoneNumber: z .string() .optional() + .refine((x) => (x ? isValidPhoneNumber(x) : true), { + params: error.invalidValue, + }),Note: You need to implement or import an
isValidPhoneNumber
function as appropriate.
179-186
: Consider adding validation for 'name' field in 'childInCustody' schema.The
name
field is validated for trimmed length greater than zero. To enhance validation, consider adding checks to ensure the name contains valid characters and does not include numbers or special symbols.Apply this diff to enhance name validation:
name: z .string() .refine((x) => x.trim().length > 0, { params: error.invalidValue, }) + .regex(/^[A-Za-zÁÉÍÓÚÝÞÆÖáéíóúýþæö\s'-]+$/, { + params: error.invalidValue, + }),Note: Adjust the regular expression to match valid characters based on your requirements.
189-189
: Ensure 'approveExternalData' has a meaningful error message.The
approveExternalData
field uses.refine((v) => v)
without specifying an error message. Consider providing a custom error message to inform users why their input was invalid.Apply this diff to add an error message:
approveExternalData: z .boolean() - .refine((v) => v), + .refine((v) => v, { + params: error.approvalRequired, + }),Note: Define
error.approvalRequired
with an appropriate message in your error definitions.
Line range hint
188-267
: Confirm adherence to TypeScript best practices and effective tree-shaking.Since this is part of
libs/**/*
, ensure that all exported types and schemas are correctly typed and that unused code is eliminated during bundling to support effective tree-shaking.Consider reviewing the exports and imports to ensure they align with best practices for library code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- apps/application-system/api/src/app/app.module.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/api/domains/application/src/lib/application.service.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.module.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (6 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accodent-notification-v2.utils.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts (0 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (5 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/types/index.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/application/ui-shell/src/lib/FormShell.tsx (0 hunks)
- libs/clients/icelandic-health-insurance/rights-portal/src/clientConfig.json (28 hunks)
- libs/clients/icelandic-health-insurance/rights-portal/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/clients/icelandic-health-insurance/rights-portal/src/lib/providers.ts (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts
- libs/application/ui-shell/src/lib/FormShell.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (10)
apps/application-system/api/src/app/app.module.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/api/domains/application/src/lib/application.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.module.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accodent-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/types/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/clients/icelandic-health-insurance/rights-portal/src/clientConfig.json (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/clients/icelandic-health-insurance/rights-portal/src/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/clients/icelandic-health-insurance/rights-portal/src/lib/providers.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accodent-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)
Learnt from: HjorturJ PR: island-is/island.is#16111 File: libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts:210-361 Timestamp: 2024-09-25T13:23:39.010Z Learning: In `accident-notification.utils.spec.ts`, the helper functions `getDefaultAttachments` and `getFullBasicAnswers` should not be modified to accept parameters for customizing returned data.
🪛 Biome
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accodent-notification-v2.utils.ts
[error] 259-260: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 293-295: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (16)
libs/clients/icelandic-health-insurance/rights-portal/src/lib/providers.ts (2)
13-13
: LGTM: Import statement for AccidentreportsApi is correct.The
AccidentreportsApi
is correctly imported from the '../../gen/fetch' module, following the existing pattern and maintaining consistency with other API imports.
Line range hint
1-34
: Overall assessment: Changes are well-implemented and align with project goals.The addition of
AccidentreportsApi
to this providers file is well-executed and aligns with the PR objectives of connecting a new API for accident notifications. The changes maintain the existing code structure and follow the established patterns, which supports maintainability and consistency.The modifications adhere to the coding guidelines for library files:
- The file is part of a reusable library for NextJS apps.
- TypeScript is used for defining types (as implied by importing from a generated file).
- The structure supports effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
These changes contribute to the modernization of the system as intended in the PR objectives.
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.module.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-52
: Overall assessment: Changes are minimal and align with PR objectives.The modification to replace
HealthInsuranceV2ClientModule
withRightsPortalClientModule
is the only significant change in this file. This update aligns well with the PR's goal of modernizing the system and connecting a new client for accident notifications. The overall structure and functionality of theAccidentNotificationModule
remain intact, which is good for maintaining consistency.The changes adhere to the coding guidelines for files in the
libs
directory:
- The module structure supports reusability across different NextJS apps.
- The file uses TypeScript, as evidenced by the
.ts
extension and type annotations.- The single, specific import of
RightsPortalClientModule
suggests good tree-shaking practices.
10-10
: LGTM: Import change aligns with PR objectives.The replacement of
HealthInsuranceV2ClientModule
withRightsPortalClientModule
aligns well with the PR objective of connecting a new client for accident notifications. This change appears to be part of the effort to modernize the system as mentioned in the PR summary.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, let's verify the usage of both modules across the codebase:
This will help us confirm that the old module is not being used elsewhere and that the new module is properly integrated.
Also applies to: 29-29
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Import replacement is correctly implemented and does not affect other modules.
The replacement of
HealthInsuranceV2ClientModule
withRightsPortalClientModule
inaccident-notification.module.ts
is properly localized. Other modules continue to useHealthInsuranceV2ClientModule
without issues, ensuring no conflicts or inconsistencies are introduced by this change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of old and new modules across the codebase echo "Checking for any remaining usage of HealthInsuranceV2ClientModule:" rg "HealthInsuranceV2ClientModule" --type ts echo "Checking for usage of new RightsPortalClientModule:" rg "RightsPortalClientModule" --type tsLength of output: 3587
apps/application-system/api/src/app/app.module.ts (3)
58-58
: LGTM: New import statement is correct and follows the existing pattern.The import of
RightsPortalClientConfig
is correctly added and aligns with the PR objective of connecting a new client for accident notifications. It follows the established pattern for importing client configurations in this module.
116-116
: LGTM: RightsPortalClientConfig correctly added to ConfigModule.The
RightsPortalClientConfig
is properly added to theload
array inConfigModule.forRoot()
. Its placement maintains the alphabetical order of the configurations, which is consistent with the existing code structure. This addition ensures that the new client configuration will be available throughout the application, supporting the PR's objective of connecting a new API for accident notifications.
58-58
: Summary: Changes successfully integrate RightsPortalClientConfig.The modifications to
app.module.ts
effectively integrate the newRightsPortalClientConfig
into the application. These changes align well with the PR objective of connecting a new client for accident notifications, contributing to the modernization of the system. The code adheres to the existing patterns and TypeScript best practices, maintaining consistency within the module.Also applies to: 116-116
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/types/index.ts (1)
17-18
: Addition of 'jobTitle' to 'Applicant' type looks goodThe optional
jobTitle
field enhances theApplicant
type by providing additional information without affecting existing functionality.libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (1)
194-202
: Review commented-out confirmation sending logicThe confirmation sending logic in the
reviewApplication
method is commented out. Ensure that this is intentional and that the application functions correctly without this code. If the code is temporarily disabled, consider adding a TODO comment explaining when it will be re-enabled or refactored.libs/api/domains/application/src/lib/application.service.ts (2)
Line range hint
118-122
: 'create' method implementation is correct and follows best practicesThe method correctly uses TypeScript types and follows the established pattern for interacting with the API.
Line range hint
124-129
: 'getApplicationCountByTypeIdAndStatus' method is properly implementedThe method correctly delegates to the API and uses the appropriate types for parameters.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (3)
4-4
: LGTM!The import statement for
YES
is appropriate and correctly added.
20-22
: Enums imported correctly from '../types'.The additional enums
OnBehalf
,Status
, andChoiceEnum
are properly imported and used.
215-215
: Verify the existence and correctness of 'additionalAttachments' schema.The
attachments
field is included in the main schema, but there is no validation to ensure that attachments required byadditionalAttachments
are provided. Ensure that whenadditionalAttachments.answer
isAttachmentsEnum.ADDITIONALNOW
, the necessary files are included in theattachments
field.Run the following script to check for references to
additionalAttachments
:libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accodent-notification-v2.utils.ts (2)
258-261
: Verify assignment oflocationDescription
fieldBoth
description
andlocationDescription
fields are assignedaccidentDetails.descriptionOfAccident
. Is this intentional? IflocationDescription
should represent a different piece of data, please verify and correct accordingly.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 259-260: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
1-379
: Code adheres to TypeScript practices and promotes reusabilityThe utility functions are well-defined with appropriate TypeScript types, enhancing type safety and reusability across different applications. The exports are correctly managed, aligning with the coding guidelines for
libs/**/*
pattern.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 259-260: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 293-295: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
...api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accodent-notification-v2.utils.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accodent-notification-v2.utils.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accodent-notification-v2.utils.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accodent-notification-v2.utils.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accodent-notification-v2.utils.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Affected services are: api,application-system-api,download-service,license-api,application-system-form, Deployed services: application-system-api,application-system-form,api,download-service,application-system-api-worker,license-api,consultation-portal,web. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.spec.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (3)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.spec.ts (3)
25-25
: LGTM: New import for AccidentreportsApiThe import of
AccidentreportsApi
is consistent with the PR objective of connecting a new API for accident notifications. This change aligns with the modernization effort mentioned in the PR description.
126-132
: LGTM: Mock AccidentreportsApi added to test moduleThe addition of the mock
AccidentreportsApi
to the test module is well-implemented. The mock methodsaddAttachment
andgetAttachmentStatus
return resolved promises, which is suitable for testing. This change supports the integration of the new API for accident notifications.
139-139
: LGTM: AccidentreportsApi instance added to test setupThe addition of
accidentReportsApi = module.get(AccidentreportsApi)
is correct and necessary for accessing the mock AccidentreportsApi in the tests. This change is consistent with the previous additions and supports the new API integration.
...odules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (2)
54-54
: LGTM: Successful transition to new API with enhanced security.The
submitApplication
method has been successfully updated to use the newAccidentreportsApi
with proper authentication. The changes align well with the PR objectives and enhance security.Consider renaming
documentId
toreportId
in the return object for consistency:return { - documentId: reportId, + reportId: reportId, sentDocuments: fileHashList, }Also applies to: 64-71, 79-79, 93-97, 103-104
163-181
: Consider removing unusedsendAttachment
method.The entire
sendAttachment
method has been commented out. If this method is no longer needed with the new API, consider removing it entirely to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.If there's a reason to keep this code for future reference, please add a TODO comment explaining why it's being kept and any plans for future use or refactoring.
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)
122-190
: Remove commented-out code to enhance maintainabilityThe large block of commented-out code between lines 122 and 190 can be removed. Keeping outdated or unused code increases complexity and may cause confusion for future maintainers.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)
Learnt from: HjorturJ PR: island-is/island.is#16111 File: libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts:210-361 Timestamp: 2024-09-25T13:23:39.010Z Learning: In `accident-notification.utils.spec.ts`, the helper functions `getDefaultAttachments` and `getFullBasicAnswers` should not be modified to accept parameters for customizing returned data.
🔇 Additional comments (12)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (7)
31-32
: LGTM: New imports and constructor update align with PR objectives.The addition of
AccidentreportsApi
and related imports, along with the constructor update, align well with the PR's objective to connect a new API for accident notifications.Also applies to: 45-45
50-52
: LGTM: Enhanced API security with authentication middleware.The
accidentsReportsApiWithAuth
method effectively applies authentication middleware to the API calls, enhancing security and aligning with best practices.
143-149
: Clarify the intention behind commented-out attachment logic.The logic for sending attachments in the
addAdditionalAttachment
method has been commented out. This change could potentially break the functionality of adding additional attachments. Please clarify the intention behind this change:
- Is this a temporary change?
- If it's permanent, how will additional attachments be handled going forward?
- Should we remove the commented-out code if it's no longer needed?
Consider adding a TODO comment explaining the reason for commenting out this logic and any future plans for handling additional attachments.
Would you like assistance in implementing a solution for handling additional attachments with the new API?
Also applies to: 154-154
194-202
: Clarify the intention behind commented-out review confirmation logic.The logic for sending review confirmation in the
reviewApplication
method has been commented out. This change could potentially break the review functionality. Please clarify the intention behind this change:
- Is this a temporary change?
- If it's permanent, how will review confirmations be handled with the new API?
- Should we remove the commented-out code if it's no longer needed?
Consider adding a TODO comment explaining the reason for commenting out this logic and any future plans for handling review confirmations.
Would you like assistance in implementing a solution for handling review confirmations with the new API?
Line range hint
1-204
: LGTM: Code structure and patterns maintain consistency and adhere to guidelines.The overall code structure and patterns in this file maintain consistency with the existing codebase and adhere to the coding guidelines. The use of TypeScript for type definitions and the consistent style contribute to the maintainability and reusability of the code.
Line range hint
1-204
: LGTM: Security enhancements with authentication middleware.The changes in this file enhance security by implementing authentication middleware for API calls. Additionally, the transition away from XML processing (as mentioned in the PR objectives) likely reduces potential security risks associated with XML parsing. No obvious security vulnerabilities are present in the changed code.
31-31
:⚠️ Potential issueFix typo in import path
There is a typo in the import path for
applicationToAccidentReport
.Apply this diff to correct the import path:
- import { applicationToAccidentReport } from './accident-notification-v2.utils' + import { applicationToAccidentReport } from './accident-notification-v2.utils'Likely invalid or redundant comment.
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (5)
313-314
: Possible duplication in accident descriptions
locationDescription
anddescription
are both set toaccidentDetails.descriptionOfAccident
. Confirm if this is intentional or iflocationDescription
should refer to a different field.
321-322
: Check the return values ofgetAtWork
andgetAtSailorWork
Ensure that the functions
getAtWork
andgetAtSailorWork
return the expected data structures, especially when optional values are involved.
353-368
: EnsureshipLocation
is correctly handled ingetAtSailorWork
In
getAtSailorWork
, ifshipLocation
is falsy, the function returnsfalse
. Confirm that this behavior is intended and compatible with the expected return type.
46-431
: Adherence to coding guidelinesThe code adheres to TypeScript usage for defining types and exporting them. Functions are modular and promote reusability across different applications. Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices are upheld by properly organizing imports and exports.
275-285
: Verify thatinjured.jobTitle
is consistently definedIn the
getInjured
function,injured.jobTitle
is used, but it may not be defined for all injury cases. Ensure thatjobTitle
exists on theinjured
object to avoidundefined
values.Run the following script to check if
jobTitle
is present in all relevant cases:
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (2)
87-186
: New schemas enhance data structure - Consider updating documentation.The addition of new schemas (
attachments
,accidentDetails
,fishingShipInfo
,homeAccident
,injuredPersonInformation
,juridicalPerson
, andchildInCustody
) significantly improves the structure and type safety of the accident notification data. These schemas cover various aspects of the accident reporting process, which aligns with the PR objective of modernizing the system.To maintain code quality and ease of use:
- Ensure these new schemas are used consistently throughout the application.
- Consider updating the documentation to reflect these new data structures and their purposes.
- Verify that these additions don't introduce unnecessary complexity to the codebase.
Would you like assistance in generating documentation for these new schemas?
Line range hint
1-272
: Enhance documentation for exported types to improve reusability.The file adheres well to the coding guidelines for the
libs
directory, using TypeScript for defining props and exporting types. To further improve reusability across different NextJS apps:
- Consider adding JSDoc comments to the
AccidentNotificationSchema
and its exported typeAccidentNotification
.- Ensure that all exported types and enums (including those imported from
../types
) are well-documented.- If not already present, consider adding a README.md file in this directory explaining the purpose and usage of these schemas.
These documentation improvements will facilitate easier integration and usage of these schemas across different parts of the application.
Would you like assistance in generating JSDoc comments for the exported types?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (6 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (10)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (6)
31-33
: LGTM! Import statements are correct and aligned with the new API integration.The new imports for
applicationToAccidentReport
,AccidentreportsApi
, and authentication modules are appropriate for the PR's objective. The previously reported typo in the import path has been correctly addressed.
45-45
: LGTM! Constructor updated to use the new AccidentreportsApi.The constructor change aligns with the PR objective of replacing the XML client with a new API. The use of TypeScript for defining the injected dependency adheres to the coding guidelines.
50-52
: LGTM! New method enhances security and reusability.The
accidentsReportsApiWithAuth
method is a good addition that ensures authenticated API calls. This aligns with the PR objective of modernizing the system and enhances the overall security of the service. The method's reusability across different API calls within the service is a plus.
Line range hint
1-204
: Overall, good progress on API transition, but clarification needed on some changes.The file has been successfully updated to integrate the new
AccidentreportsApi
, aligning with the PR objective of connecting a new API for accident notifications and modernizing the system. The changes adhere to TypeScript usage and promote reusability, as per the coding guidelines.However, several methods related to attachments and review confirmation have been commented out, which raises some questions about the transition strategy.
Could you please provide a high-level explanation of:
- The overall transition strategy from the old XML client to the new API.
- The status of attachment handling and review confirmation in the new system.
- Any pending tasks or future plans for reimplementing commented-out functionality.
This information will help ensure that all necessary functionality is accounted for in the new implementation and that the transition is smooth and complete.
163-181
: Clarification needed: sendAttachment method is entirely commented out.The
sendAttachment
method has been entirely commented out. This is consistent with the changes in theaddAdditionalAttachment
method and further suggests that the attachment functionality is being removed or significantly refactored.Please provide clarification on:
- The reason for removing this method.
- How attachment functionality will be handled in the new system, if at all.
- Any plans for reimplementing this functionality with the new API.
To help verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
This will help identify any other parts of the codebase that might be affected by the removal of this method.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Incomplete: Shell script encountered errors. Please run the corrected script below to continue verification.
sendAttachment Method Removal is Consistent with New Attachment Handling Implementations
The
sendAttachment
method has been entirely commented out inaccident-notification.service.ts
. Additionally, new methods likesendEmailWithAttachment
have been introduced across various services to handle attachments. This indicates that the attachment functionality has been refactored to a more standardized approach.
Removed Method:
sendAttachment
inaccident-notification.service.ts
New Attachment Handling Methods:
sendEmailWithAttachment
in:
children-residence-change.service.ts
shared.service.ts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to sendAttachment in the codebase # Search for references to sendAttachment echo "Searching for references to sendAttachment:" rg "sendAttachment" --type ts # Search for potential new methods handling attachments echo "\nSearching for potential new methods handling attachments:" rg "send.*ttachment|attach.*end" --type tsLength of output: 7036
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to sendAttachment in the codebase # Search for references to sendAttachment echo "Searching for references to sendAttachment:" rg "sendAttachment" --type ts # Search for potential new methods handling attachments echo -e "\nSearching for potential new methods handling attachments:" rg "send.*ttachment|attach.*end" --type tsLength of output: 3719
194-202
: Clarification needed: Review confirmation logic is commented out.The logic for sending confirmation in the
reviewApplication
method has been commented out. This suggests that the review confirmation process is being modified or removed.Please provide clarification on:
- The reason for commenting out this logic.
- How the review confirmation process will work with the new API.
- Any plans for reimplementing this functionality.
To help verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
This will help identify any other parts of the codebase that might be affected by this change and potentially reveal any new implementation of the review confirmation process.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (4)
Line range hint
33-55
: LGTM: Improved validation and consistency in schemas.The updates to the
representative
andcompanyInfo
schemas enhance type safety and validation. ThecompanyInfo
schema is now correctly marked as optional, addressing the previous inconsistency. These changes contribute to better code quality and maintainability.
57-85
: Verify consistent usage of the newexternalData
schema.The newly added
externalData
schema suggests integration with external data sources, which aligns with the PR objective. To ensure consistency and proper implementation:
- Verify that this schema is used correctly in the
AccidentNotificationService
or any other relevant services.- Ensure that the data fetched from the new API matches this schema structure.
- Check for any necessary data transformations between the API response and this schema.
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of externalData in relevant files rg -n "externalData" --type ts $(fd -t d "accident-notification" --max-depth 3)
Line range hint
188-267
: Verify backwards compatibility with updatedAccidentNotificationSchema
.The
AccidentNotificationSchema
has been significantly updated to incorporate new sub-schemas and improve type safety through the use ofnativeEnum
. While these changes align with the PR objective of modernizing the system, it's crucial to ensure they don't break existing functionality.To maintain system integrity:
- Verify that these changes are backwards compatible with existing data and API calls.
- Ensure that any services or components using this schema are updated accordingly.
- Consider adding or updating unit tests to cover the new schema structure.
✅ Verification successful
To gather more information about the usage of AccidentNotificationSchema and related components, I'll search for partial matches of "AccidentNotification" in the codebase.
Verify changes within the accident-notification template to ensure backwards compatibility.
Based on the analysis of the codebase, the
AccidentNotificationSchema
is primarily used within its own template directory and doesn't appear to be directly imported or used outside of the accident-notification template. This suggests that the risk of breaking existing functionality in other parts of the system is low.To ensure backwards compatibility and maintain system integrity:
Review all files within the
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/
directory that import and use theAccidentNotificationSchema
to ensure they are updated to work with the new schema structure.Pay special attention to the following files:
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate.ts
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/utils/
directory fileslibs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/
directory filesUpdate any unit tests related to the accident-notification template to reflect the new schema structure and ensure they pass.
Consider adding integration tests that cover the entire accident-notification application flow to verify that the changes don't introduce any unexpected behavior.
If there are any API endpoints that directly interact with the accident-notification template, ensure they are compatible with the updated schema.
While the changes appear to be localized, it's important to thoroughly test the accident-notification template to ensure that all existing functionality remains intact with the new schema structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of AccidentNotificationSchema in the codebase rg -n "AccidentNotificationSchema" --type tsLength of output: 589708
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for partial matches of "AccidentNotification" in the codebase rg "AccidentNotification" --type tsLength of output: 31876
20-22
: Verify export of new types in the referenced file.The newly imported types (
OnBehalf
,Status
, andChoiceEnum
) are used throughout the schema definitions. Ensure that these types are properly exported from the../types
file and are well-documented to maintain code clarity and type safety across the application.
...api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/index.ts (2)
Line range hint
9-13
: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for the type alias.The export statements look good and maintain backwards compatibility. The new type alias
AccidentNotificationAnswers
is a good practice for potential future refactoring.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
AccidentNotificationAnswers
type alias for better code documentation:+// Alias for backwards compatibility and future refactoring export type AccidentNotificationAnswers = AccidentNotification
Line range hint
1-18
: LGTM! Consider grouping related imports for better readability.The overall structure of the file is excellent, promoting reusability and allowing for effective tree-shaking. The use of TypeScript for type definitions and exports is consistent and aligns with our coding guidelines.
For improved readability, consider grouping related imports together:
import AccidentNotificationTemplate from './lib/AccidentNotificationTemplate' import { AccidentNotification } from './lib/dataSchema' -import * as appMessages from './lib/messages' import { OnBehalf } from './types' +import * as appMessages from './lib/messages' import * as appUtils from './utils'This groups the type imports together and the utility imports together.
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/attachments/attachment.utils.ts (3)
108-114
: Approve getReportId function with minor suggestionThe
getReportId
function is well-implemented, type-safe, and focused on a single responsibility. It correctly retrieves the document ID from the application's external data.Consider adding a null check or providing a default value to handle cases where the path doesn't exist:
export const getReportId = (application: ApplicationWithAttachments) => { const externalData = application.externalData return getValueViaPath( externalData, 'submitApplication.data.documentId', ) as number | undefined }This change would make the function more robust against potential data inconsistencies.
116-127
: Approve getNewAttachments function with error handling suggestionThe
getNewAttachments
function is well-structured and effectively retrieves new attachments. However, it lacks error handling for potential issues during asynchronous operations.Consider wrapping the function body in a try-catch block:
export const getNewAttachments = async ( application: ApplicationWithAttachments, attachmentProvider: AccidentNotificationAttachmentProvider, ) => { try { const attachmentStatus = getApplicationAttachmentStatus(application) const requests = attachmentStatusToAttachmentRequests(attachmentStatus) const attachments = await attachmentProvider.getFiles(requests, application) return filterOutAlreadySentDocuments(attachments, application) } catch (error) { console.error('Error getting new attachments:', error) throw new Error('Failed to retrieve new attachments') } }This change would improve error handling and make the function more robust.
129-147
: Approve getReviewApplicationData function with type safety suggestionThe
getReviewApplicationData
function is well-implemented, extracting relevant review data from the application. To further improve type safety, consider defining an interface for the return type:interface ReviewApplicationData { documentId: number; isRepresentativeOfCompanyOrInstitute: boolean; reviewApproval: ReviewApprovalEnum; reviewComment: string; } export const getReviewApplicationData = (application: Application): ReviewApplicationData => { // ... existing implementation ... }This change would make the function's return type explicit and improve type checking for consumers of this function.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/attachments/attachment.utils.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/attachments/attachment.utils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/attachments/attachment.utils.ts (1)
Learnt from: HjorturJ PR: island-is/island.is#16111 File: libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts:210-361 Timestamp: 2024-09-25T13:23:39.010Z Learning: In `accident-notification.utils.spec.ts`, the helper functions `getDefaultAttachments` and `getFullBasicAnswers` should not be modified to accept parameters for customizing returned data.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/attachments/attachment.utils.ts (2)
3-9
: Improved type safety with new importsThe addition of
ApplicationWithAttachments
,AccidentNotificationAnswers
, andReviewApprovalEnum
imports enhances type safety and specificity in handling accident notifications. This aligns well with the PR objective and promotes better code quality.
25-27
: Enhanced modularity with new utility importsThe addition of
AccidentNotificationAttachmentProvider
,getApplicationDocumentId
, andutils
imports improves modularity and code reuse. This change aligns with the PR objective and promotes better code organization.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (7)
68-106
: LGTM: Comprehensive accident type mappings with room for improvementThe
accidentTypeMap
,workAccidentSubtypeMap
, andstudiesAccidentSubtypeMap
provide clear and comprehensive mappings for various accident types and subtypes. The comments offer valuable context for the numeric codes.Consider using an enum or constant object for the numeric codes to improve readability and maintainability. For example:
const AccidentTypes = { SPORTS: 4, WORK: 6, HOME_ACTIVITIES: 7, // ... other types } as const; const accidentTypeMap = { [AccidentTypeEnum.SPORTS]: { type: AccidentTypes.SPORTS }, [AccidentTypeEnum.WORK]: { type: AccidentTypes.WORK }, // ... other mappings };This approach would make the code more self-documenting and reduce the reliance on comments for understanding the numeric codes.
108-137
: LGTM: Comprehensive accident type conversion with room for improvementThe
accidentTypeToDTO
function effectively converts accident types from application answers to the DTO format, handling both base types and subtypes for work and studies accidents.Consider adding a comment or adjusting the logic for the fallback case:
const baseType = accidentTypeMap[accidentType] || { type: 6 } // Fallback to general work accident if type is not foundThis would clarify the intention behind defaulting to type 6 when an unknown accident type is encountered.
139-173
: LGTM: Clear location conversion functions with potential for refactoringThe
locationToDTO
andshipLocationToDTO
functions effectively convert location enums to numeric codes, handling all cases and providing default values for unexpected inputs.Consider refactoring these functions to use a mapping object for consistency with other parts of the code and to potentially reduce duplication:
const generalLocationMap = { [GeneralWorkplaceAccidentLocationEnum.ATTHEWORKPLACE]: 0, [GeneralWorkplaceAccidentLocationEnum.TOORFROMTHEWORKPLACE]: 1, [GeneralWorkplaceAccidentLocationEnum.OTHER]: 2, }; const shipLocationMap = { [FishermanWorkplaceAccidentLocationEnum.ONTHESHIP]: 1, [FishermanWorkplaceAccidentLocationEnum.TOORFROMTHEWORKPLACE]: 2, [FishermanWorkplaceAccidentLocationEnum.OTHER]: 3, }; const locationToDTO = (answers: AccidentNotificationAnswers) => { const accidentLocation = getValueViaPath( answers, 'accidentLocation.answer' ) as GeneralWorkplaceAccidentLocationEnum; return generalLocationMap[accidentLocation] ?? 2; }; const shipLocationToDTO = (answers: AccidentNotificationAnswers) => { const accidentLocation = getValueViaPath( answers, 'accidentLocation.answer' ) as FishermanWorkplaceAccidentLocationEnum; return shipLocationMap[accidentLocation] ?? 3; };This approach would make the code more consistent with other parts of the file and potentially easier to maintain.
175-198
: LGTM: Robust reporter information extraction with room for improvementThe
getReporter
function effectively extracts reporter information from the application answers, handling potential missing data well.Consider adding basic validation for email and phone number to ensure data integrity:
const isValidEmail = (email: string): boolean => { // Basic email regex return /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(email); }; const isValidPhoneNumber = (phone: string): boolean => { // Adjust regex based on expected phone number format return /^\+?[\d\s-]{7,}$/.test(phone); }; // In getReporter function: email: isValidEmail(applicant.email ?? '') ? applicant.email : '', phoneNumber: isValidPhoneNumber(applicant.phoneNumber ?? '') ? applicant.phoneNumber : '',This would ensure that only valid email addresses and phone numbers are included in the report.
200-226
: LGTM: Effective injured person information extraction with potential for improvementThe
getInjured
function correctly extracts information about the injured person, handling different scenarios based on who the notification is for.Consider adding similar email and phone number validation as suggested for the
getReporter
function:// Add isValidEmail and isValidPhoneNumber functions if not already present // In getInjured function: email: isValidEmail(injured.email ?? '') ? injured.email : '', phone: isValidPhoneNumber(injured.phoneNumber ?? '') ? injured.phoneNumber : '',This would ensure consistency in data validation across different parts of the application.
264-312
: LGTM: Well-structured location-specific detail extractionThe
getAtHome
,getAtWork
, andgetAtSailorWork
functions effectively extract specific details based on the accident location, handling potential missing data appropriately.For consistency, consider adjusting the
getAtHome
function to match the structure of the other two:const getAtHome = (answers: AccidentNotificationAnswers) => { const homeAccident = getValueViaPath( answers, 'homeAccident' ) as HomeAccidentV2 if (!homeAccident) { return undefined } return { address: homeAccident.address ?? '', city: homeAccident.community ?? '', postcode: homeAccident.postalCode ?? '', comment: homeAccident.moreDetails ?? '', } }This change removes the redundant check and makes the function structure more consistent with
getAtWork
andgetAtSailorWork
.
377-392
: LGTM: Clear attachment type mapping with potential for refactoringThe
mapAttachmentTypeToAccidentReportType
function provides a clear mapping between attachment types and effectively handles unknown types by throwing an error.Consider refactoring this function to use an object mapping for consistency with other parts of the code:
const attachmentTypeMap = { [AttachmentTypeEnum.INJURY_CERTIFICATE]: MinarsidurAPIModelsAccidentReportsAccidentReportAttachmentTypeEnum.NUMBER_1, [AttachmentTypeEnum.POWER_OF_ATTORNEY]: MinarsidurAPIModelsAccidentReportsAccidentReportAttachmentTypeEnum.NUMBER_2, [AttachmentTypeEnum.POLICE_REPORT]: MinarsidurAPIModelsAccidentReportsAccidentReportAttachmentTypeEnum.NUMBER_3, [AttachmentTypeEnum.ADDITIONAL_FILES]: MinarsidurAPIModelsAccidentReportsAccidentReportAttachmentTypeEnum.NUMBER_4, }; export const mapAttachmentTypeToAccidentReportType = ( attachmentType: AttachmentTypeEnum ): MinarsidurAPIModelsAccidentReportsAccidentReportAttachmentTypeEnum => { const mappedType = attachmentTypeMap[attachmentType]; if (mappedType === undefined) { throw new Error('Unknown attachment type'); } return mappedType; };This approach is more declarative and easier to maintain if new attachment types are added in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)
Learnt from: HjorturJ PR: island-is/island.is#16111 File: libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts:210-361 Timestamp: 2024-09-25T13:23:39.010Z Learning: In `accident-notification.utils.spec.ts`, the helper functions `getDefaultAttachments` and `getFullBasicAnswers` should not be modified to accept parameters for customizing returned data.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (5)
1-34
: LGTM: Well-organized importsThe import statements are comprehensive and well-structured, covering all necessary types, enums, and utilities for handling accident notification data transformation.
36-48
: LGTM: Well-structured main functionThe
applicationToAccidentReport
function is well-organized, using helper functions to modularize the data transformation process. This structure enhances readability and maintainability.
50-59
: LGTM: Clear and comprehensive enum mappingThe
reportingForMap
provides a clear and concise mapping betweenWhoIsTheNotificationForEnum
andMinarsidurAPIModelsAccidentReportsReporterDTOReportingForEnum
. All enum values are covered, ensuring completeness.
61-66
: LGTM: Robust enum conversion functionThe
whoIsTheNotificationForToDTO
function efficiently convertsWhoIsTheNotificationForEnum
to the corresponding DTO enum value. It handles potential missing mappings and provides a fallback value, ensuring robustness.
359-375
:⚠️ Potential issueEffective attachment transformation with areas for improvement
The
getAttachments
function successfully maps the attachments to the DTO format, but there are a few areas that could be enhanced:
The content type extraction from the file name is simple but may not always be accurate. Consider using a more robust method or library for determining file types.
The hack for handling additional files (type 4) is a temporary solution that needs to be addressed properly.
Consider implementing proper support for additional files or handling this scenario more elegantly. For example:
type: mapAttachmentTypeToAccidentReportType(attachment.attachmentType),And then update the
mapAttachmentTypeToAccidentReportType
function to handle the additional files case appropriately.To check the impact of this hack, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for attachment type 4 usage in the codebase rg --type typescript "attachmentType.*===.*4" -C 3This will help identify other parts of the codebase that might be affected by this temporary solution.
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (1)
54-54
: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Updated to use new API and enhanced securityThe changes to the
submitApplication
method align well with the PR objective of connecting a new API for accident notifications. The addition of authentication enhances security.However, there's a minor inconsistency in the returned object:
Consider renaming the
documentId
key toreportId
in the returned object for consistency:return { - documentId: reportId, + reportId: reportId, sentDocuments: fileHashList, }This change will make the code more consistent with the new API terminology and prevent potential confusion.
Also applies to: 64-71, 79-79, 93-97, 103-103
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (2)
1-34
: Consider organizing imports for better readabilityThe imports are comprehensive but could be organized better for improved readability. Consider grouping imports by their source:
- External libraries
- Application-specific imports
- Type imports
This organization can help developers quickly understand the dependencies of the file.
68-86
: Improve documentation for accident types and subtypesThe comment block explaining accident types and subtypes is helpful but could be improved. Consider using JSDoc format for better integration with IDE tooling and documentation generators. For example:
/** * Accident types: * 4 - Íþróttaslys (Sports accident) * 6 - Vinnuslys (Work accident) * 7 - Heimilistrygging (Home insurance) * 8 - Björgunarmenn (Rescue workers) * 9 - Nemendur við iðnnám (Vocational students) * * Subtypes for type 6 (Work accident): * 1 - Almenn vinna á landi (General work on land) * 2 - Vinna sjómanna (Seamen's work) * 3 - Atvinnumennska í íþróttum (Professional sports) * 4 - Vinna við landbúnað (Agricultural work) * * Subtypes for type 9 (Vocational students): * 5 - Starfsnám (Internship) * 6 - Verknám við háskóla (University practical training) * 7 - Iðnám í löggildum iðngreinum (Apprenticeship in licensed trades) */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.spec.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)
Learnt from: HjorturJ PR: island-is/island.is#16111 File: libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts:210-361 Timestamp: 2024-09-25T13:23:39.010Z Learning: In `accident-notification.utils.spec.ts`, the helper functions `getDefaultAttachments` and `getFullBasicAnswers` should not be modified to accept parameters for customizing returned data.
🔇 Additional comments (10)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (7)
11-11
: LGTM: New imports align with PR objectivesThe new imports, including utility functions,
AccidentreportsApi
, and authentication-related imports, align well with the PR objective of connecting a new API for accident notifications. These changes contribute to the modernization of the system and support better TypeScript usage.Also applies to: 22-24, 28-32
45-45
: LGTM: Constructor updated for new APIThe replacement of
documentApi
withaccidentReportsApi
in the constructor is consistent with the PR objective of replacing the existing XML client with a new API for accident notifications.
50-52
: LGTM: Enhanced security with authenticated API callsThe new private method
accidentsReportsApiWithAuth
is a valuable addition that ensures all API calls are authenticated. This enhancement aligns with best practices for security and supports the modernization effort mentioned in the PR objectives.
127-174
: LGTM: Improved attachment handling with new API and better error managementThe changes to the
addAdditionalAttachment
method are well-implemented and align with the PR objectives. Key improvements include:
- Integration with the new API, including proper authentication.
- Enhanced error handling, particularly the check for
reportId
.- Improved type mapping for attachments.
These changes contribute to a more robust and secure implementation of the attachment handling process.
184-200
: LGTM: Streamlined review process with new API integrationThe
reviewApplication
method has been successfully updated to work with the new API. Notable improvements include:
- Integration of authentication for API calls.
- Streamlined data extraction using the
getReviewApplicationData
utility.- Updated data structure for submitting the review confirmation, which better represents the review process.
These changes align well with the PR objectives and contribute to a more modern and efficient implementation.
Line range hint
1-200
: LGTM: Consistent structure and improved patternsThe overall structure of the
AccidentNotificationService
demonstrates several improvements:
- Consistent use of authenticated API calls, enhancing security.
- Improved error handling throughout, contributing to code robustness.
- Maintained TypeScript usage for defining types and interfaces, aligning with coding guidelines for the
libs
directory.These changes not only meet the PR objectives but also contribute to the overall quality and maintainability of the codebase.
Line range hint
1-200
: LGTM: Successful refactoring aligns with PR objectives and coding guidelinesThe
AccidentNotificationService
has been successfully refactored to integrate with the new API for accident notifications. Key improvements include:
- Consistent use of authenticated API calls across all public methods, enhancing security.
- Improved error handling and type safety, contributing to code robustness.
- Maintained reusability and TypeScript usage, adhering to coding guidelines for the
libs
directory.These changes not only meet the PR objectives of connecting a new API and modernizing the system but also contribute to the overall quality, security, and maintainability of the codebase. The refactoring demonstrates a thoughtful approach to modernizing the accident notification system while maintaining good coding practices.
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (3)
1-402
: Summary of review findingsOverall, the
accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
file provides a comprehensive set of utilities for handling accident notifications. However, there are several areas where improvements can be made:
- Organize imports for better readability.
- Add error handling and input validation to the main
applicationToAccidentReport
function.- Improve documentation for accident types and subtypes using JSDoc format.
- Simplify some functions, such as
getAccidentTypes
, for better readability.- Enhance error handling and data validation in DTO creation functions.
- Address the inconsistency in accessing
accidentType
ingetEmployer
andgetClub
functions.- Properly handle additional files in the
getAttachments
function instead of using a temporary hack.- Refactor the
mapAttachmentTypeToAccidentReportType
function to use an object mapping approach.Addressing these points will improve the overall quality, maintainability, and robustness of the code.
369-385
:⚠️ Potential issueAddress the temporary solution for additional files
The comment "Hack since additional files are not supported yet..." indicates a temporary solution that needs to be properly addressed. This hack could lead to incorrect categorization of attachments. Please implement proper support for additional files or handle this scenario more elegantly.
Additionally, consider adding error handling for cases where the file name doesn't have an extension or the attachment type is unknown.
Example improvement:
const getAttachments = ( attachments: Array<AccidentNotificationAttachment>, ): Array<MinarsidurAPIModelsAccidentReportsAccidentReportAttachmentDTO> => { return attachments.map((attachment) => { const fileNameParts = attachment.name.split('.'); const contentType = fileNameParts.length > 1 ? fileNameParts.pop() : undefined; let type = attachment.attachmentType; if (type === AttachmentTypeEnum.ADDITIONAL_FILES) { // TODO: Implement proper handling for additional files console.warn('Additional files are not fully supported yet'); type = MinarsidurAPIModelsAccidentReportsAccidentReportAttachmentTypeEnum.NUMBER_2; } return { type, document: { fileName: attachment.name, contentType, data: attachment.content, }, }; }); };To check for occurrences of attachment type 4 and references to additional files in the codebase, run:
#!/bin/bash # Search for attachment type 4 usage echo "Searching for attachment type 4 usage:" rg --type typescript "attachmentType.*===.*4" -C 3 # Search for references to additional files echo "\nSearching for references to additional files:" rg --type typescript "additional.*files" -i -C 3
238-272
:⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling and remove commented-out code in
getAccident
The
getAccident
function could benefit from improved error handling and data validation. Additionally, there are commented-out properties that should be addressed:
- Consider adding null checks for critical fields and throw meaningful errors if they're missing.
- The use of
new Date()
as a fallback for missing dates might lead to inaccurate data. Consider usingnull
or a specific placeholder date instead.- Remove or implement the commented-out properties
dockName
anddockGps
. If they're not needed, remove the comments to keep the code clean.Example improvement:
dateTimeOfDoctorVisit: accidentDetails.dateOfDoctorVisit ? new Date(accidentDetails.dateOfDoctorVisit) : null,To check if
dockName
anddockGps
are used elsewhere in the codebase, run:✅ Verification successful
Confirm
dockName
anddockGps
are not used elsewhereThe
dockName
anddockGps
properties are only present as commented-out lines in theaccident-notification-v2.utils.ts
file and are not used elsewhere in the codebase. It is safe to remove the commented-out code to keep the codebase clean.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for dockName and dockGps usage in TypeScript files rg --type typescript "dockName|dockGps" -C 3Length of output: 365
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for dockName and dockGps usage in TypeScript files using glob patterns rg "dockName|dockGps" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -C 3Length of output: 1379
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...pi-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
91-94
: Avoid using spread syntax in reducers to improve performanceSimilar to the previous comment, using the spread operator
...
in this reducer can lead to performance issues due toO(n^2)
time complexity.Refactor the reducer to mutate the accumulator directly:
receivedConfirmations: accidentStatus.confirmations ?.map((x) => ({ [mapConfirmationType(x.party)]: !!x.received, })) - .reduce( - (prev, curr) => ({ ...prev, ...curr }), - {}, - ) as AccidentNotificationConfirmation, + .reduce((acc, curr) => { + Object.assign(acc, curr) + return acc + }, {} as AccidentNotificationConfirmation),Or combine the
map
andreduce
into a singlereduce
function:receivedConfirmations: accidentStatus.confirmations - ?.map((x) => ({ - [mapConfirmationType(x.party)]: !!x.received, - })) - .reduce((acc, curr) => { - Object.assign(acc, curr) - return acc - }, {} as AccidentNotificationConfirmation), + ?.reduce((acc, x) => { + acc[mapConfirmationType(x.party)] = !!x.received + return acc + }, {} as AccidentNotificationConfirmation),🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 84-84: Avoid the use of spread (
...
) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce
) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2)
.
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
[error] 92-92: Avoid the use of spread (
...
) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce
) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2)
.
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/ApplicationStatus/index.tsx (1)
163-163
: Address the TODO to add Sentry logging and design improvements.The
TODO
comment indicates that Sentry logging and design updates are pending. Please implement the necessary error handling and design enhancements.Would you like assistance in implementing Sentry logging or updating the design? I can help generate the necessary code or open a GitHub issue to track this task.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/healthInsurance.module.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/ApplicationStatus/applicationStatusUtils.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/ApplicationStatus/index.tsx (5 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/InReviewForm/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/healthInsurance.module.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/ApplicationStatus/applicationStatusUtils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/ApplicationStatus/index.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/InReviewForm/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🪛 Biome
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts
[error] 84-84: Avoid the use of spread (
...
) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce
) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2)
.
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/healthInsurance.module.ts (3)
9-9
: LGTM: Import statement for AccidentreportsApiThe import statement for
AccidentreportsApi
is correctly added and aligns with the PR objective of connecting a new client for accident notifications.
18-18
: LGTM: Addition of AccidentreportsApi to providersThe
AccidentreportsApi
is correctly added to the providers array, making it available for dependency injection within the module. This change is consistent with the PR objective of connecting a new client for accident notifications.
Line range hint
1-24
: Verification: Compliance with coding guidelinesThe module adheres to the coding guidelines for
libs/**/*
files:
- It's designed for reusability across different NextJS apps.
- It uses TypeScript for defining and exporting types.
- The module structure allows for effective tree-shaking and bundling.
To further verify the module's usage across different NextJS apps, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify where the
HealthInsuranceModule
is being used across different NextJS applications.libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/forms/InReviewForm/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
19-30
: Approve the addition of AssigneeReview with suggestions for improvementThe addition of
AssigneeReview
looks good and follows the existing pattern, promoting reusability across different NextJS apps. Here are some suggestions to enhance the code:
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
true
argument passed to each section function inAssigneeReview
. This will improve code readability and maintainability.It might be beneficial to use an enum or constant for the form IDs ('applicantReviewForm' and 'assigneeReviewForm') to avoid potential typos and improve maintainability.
Ensure that the implementation of
applicationStatusSection
,addAttachmentsSection
, andinReviewOverviewSection
correctly handles the boolean parameter passed inAssigneeReview
.To verify the correct implementation of the section functions, please run the following script:
This will help ensure that the boolean parameter is properly utilized in each section function.
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/ApplicationStatus/applicationStatusUtils.ts (1)
142-142
:⚠️ Potential issueVerify that 'currentAccidentStatus' has a 'status' property
In the
fourthStep
function,currentAccidentStatus.status
is accessed at lines 142 and 145. Please ensure thatcurrentAccidentStatus
is an object containing astatus
property. IfcurrentAccidentStatus
is already a status value (e.g., an enum or string), accessing.status
may result in anundefined
value or a runtime error.Also applies to: 145-145
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/ApplicationStatus/index.tsx (2)
26-31
: Good use of destructuring in the function signature to improve readability.Destructuring the props directly in the function signature simplifies the component and enhances readability.
164-164
:⚠️ Potential issueLocalize the error message using
formatMessage
.Avoid hardcoding error messages; instead, use
formatMessage
to support localization and maintain consistency.Apply this refactor:
- <Text>Ekki tókst að sækja stöðu umsóknar, eitthvað fór úrskeiðis.</Text> + <Text>{formatMessage(inReview.error.couldNotFetchStatus)}</Text>If
inReview.error.couldNotFetchStatus
does not exist in your localization messages, please add the appropriate message to your localization files.Likely invalid or redundant comment.
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ation/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/ApplicationStatus/applicationStatusUtils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ation/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/ApplicationStatus/applicationStatusUtils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/application/templates/accident-notification/src/fields/ApplicationStatus/index.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/graphql/accident-notification.resolver.ts (1)
36-41
: LGTM: Method signature update improves functionality and follows TypeScript best practices.The addition of the
user
parameter with the@CurrentUser()
decorator enhances the method by providing user context. This change is well-implemented and typed correctly.Consider adding error handling for cases where the user might be undefined:
if (!user) { throw new Error('User not authenticated'); }This would improve the robustness of the function.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/graphql/accident-notification.resolver.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/healthInsurance.module.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/healthInsurance.module.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/graphql/accident-notification.resolver.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🪛 Biome
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts
[error] 89-89: Avoid the use of spread (
...
) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce
) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2)
.
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/graphql/accident-notification.resolver.ts (2)
5-11
: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate and follow best practices.The new imports from '@island.is/auth-nest-tools' are necessary for the changes made to the
accidentStatus
method. They are specific imports, which is good for tree-shaking and bundling practices. The use of internal packages also promotes code reusability across different NextJS apps.
Line range hint
1-50
: Excellent adherence to coding guidelines for library code.This file demonstrates good practices for library code:
- It's designed for reusability across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript is used effectively for type definitions and prop types.
- Imports are specific, which is good for tree-shaking and bundling.
The changes maintain these good practices, ensuring the code remains maintainable and efficient.
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts (4)
14-15
: Imports are correctly updated to use the new API client and authentication tools.The inclusion of
AccidentreportsApi
andAuthMiddleware
aligns with the migration to the new API and ensures that API calls are authenticated properly.
59-59
: Constructor correctly updated to inject the newAccidentreportsApi
.Replacing the old
DocumentApi
withAccidentreportsApi
in the constructor is appropriate for integrating the new accident notification API.
69-69
: Method signature updated appropriately to includeauth: Auth
.Adding the
auth
parameter togetAccidentNotificationStatus
ensures that API calls are made with the necessary authentication.
74-78
: Correct usage of the new API client with authentication.The call to
getAccidentReportStatus
usingaccidentReportsApiWithAuth
demonstrates proper integration with the new API and authentication middleware.
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/api/domains/health-insurance/src/lib/accident-notification.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/attachments/attachment.utils.ts (1)
126-143
: LGTM: Well-structuredgetReviewApplicationData
function.The
getReviewApplicationData
function effectively extracts review-related data from the application. It follows the single responsibility principle and uses appropriate utility functions.Consider using optional chaining and nullish coalescing for a more concise
reviewComment
assignment:const reviewComment = getValueViaPath(application.answers, 'reviewComment') as string ?? ''This change would simplify the logic and make it more resilient to
undefined
values.libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (3)
45-45
: LGTM: Constructor updated to use new APIThe constructor has been updated to use
AccidentreportsApi
instead ofDocumentApi
, which aligns with the PR objective of connecting a new API for accident notifications.For consistency, consider renaming
accidentReportsApi
toaccidentreportsApi
to match the import name:- private readonly accidentReportsApi: AccidentreportsApi, + private readonly accidentreportsApi: AccidentreportsApi,This minor change would improve naming consistency throughout the file.
54-54
: LGTM with a minor suggestion: submitApplication updated to use new APIThe
submitApplication
method has been successfully updated to use the new AccidentreportsApi, aligning with the PR objectives. The addition of theauth
parameter and the use of utility functions likeapplicationToAccidentReport
improve security and code modularity.For consistency, consider renaming the
documentId
key in the returned object toreportId
:return { - documentId: reportId, + reportId, sentDocuments: fileHashList, }This change would make the code more consistent with the new API terminology.
Also applies to: 64-71, 79-79, 93-97, 103-103
127-173
: LGTM with a suggestion: addAdditionalAttachment updated with improved error handlingThe
addAdditionalAttachment
method has been successfully updated to use the new AccidentreportsApi and includes improved error handling. The addition of theauth
parameter and the use of utility functions enhance security and code modularity.Consider adding more specific error handling for the API call:
} catch (e) { - this.logger.error('Error adding additional attachment', e) + this.logger.error('Error adding additional attachment', { error: e, reportId }) throw new Error('Villa kom upp við að bæta við viðbótarskjali.') }This change would provide more context in the error logs, making debugging easier.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.spec.ts (6 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (5 hunks)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/attachments/attachment.utils.ts (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/attachments/attachment.utils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (7)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/attachments/attachment.utils.ts (3)
3-9
: LGTM: New imports enhance type safety.The addition of
Application
,ApplicationWithAttachments
, andReviewApprovalEnum
imports is appropriate for the new functions introduced in this file. These imports contribute to improved type safety and provide access to necessary types and enums.
25-27
: LGTM: New imports support new functionality.The addition of
AccidentNotificationAttachmentProvider
,getApplicationDocumentId
, andutils
imports is appropriate for the new functions introduced in this file. These imports provide access to necessary types and utility functions required for the new attachment handling logic.
105-111
: LGTM: Correct implementation ofgetReportId
.The
getReportId
function correctly retrieves the document ID from the application's external data. This implementation addresses the issue mentioned in the past review comment by properly accessing theexternalData
property of the application.libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.service.ts (4)
11-11
: LGTM: New imports align with PR objectivesThe new imports, including utility functions, AccidentreportsApi, and Auth-related imports, align well with the PR objective of connecting a new API for accident notifications. These changes enhance type safety and support better code reusability, which is crucial for files in the
libs
directory.Also applies to: 22-24, 28-33
50-52
: LGTM: New method enhances security and reusabilityThe new private method
accidentsReportsApiWithAuth
is a great addition. It enhances security by ensuring authenticated API calls and improves code reusability across different API calls in the service. This aligns well with the coding guidelines for thelibs
directory.
183-199
: LGTM: reviewApplication successfully updated to use new APIThe
reviewApplication
method has been effectively updated to use the new AccidentreportsApi. The addition of theauth
parameter enhances security, while the use of thegetReviewApplicationData
utility function improves code modularity. These changes align well with the PR objectives and the coding guidelines for thelibs
directory.
Line range hint
1-199
: Overall LGTM: Successful implementation of new AccidentreportsApiThe AccidentNotificationService has been successfully updated to use the new AccidentreportsApi, aligning perfectly with the PR objectives. Key improvements include:
- Enhanced security through the use of authenticated API calls.
- Improved error handling and logging.
- Better code modularity with the introduction of utility functions.
- Consistent use of TypeScript best practices.
These changes not only modernize the system as intended but also improve the overall code quality and maintainability. The refactoring adheres well to the coding guidelines for the
libs
directory, ensuring reusability across different NextJS apps.Minor suggestions for naming consistency have been provided in previous comments. Addressing these would further enhance the code quality.
...-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/attachments/attachment.utils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Client changes LGTM 🚀
#15420) * feat: connect new api for accident-notification * feat: map and send attachments to new api * chore: remove unused code * feat: codegen for api changes and fix dataSchema * chore: nx format:write update dirty files * fix: remove test * chore: nx format:write update dirty files * fix: add null test to pass build * chore: lint * fix: Coderabbit comments * feat: connect review application and addAditionalAttachment * fix: pr comments and add test back in * chore: use switch instead of if * fix: getReportId * fix: codegen backend schema * chore: consistent early return * chore: simplify accidentTypeDTO * fix: lint * feat: connect getAccidentReportStatus * feat: add auth to getAccidentNotificationStatus * fix: import * chore: add test back in * fix: test * chore: remove console.log --------- Co-authored-by: andes-it <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
What
Connect a new client for accident notifications and stop using the old xml client
Why
To modernize
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ApplicationStatus
component logic, improving readability and maintainability through the introduction of utility functions.Bug Fixes
ApplicationStatus
component to provide clearer feedback when data is unavailable.Documentation
Chores