-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(service-portal): signature collection paper signees tweak #16108
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request modify the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16108 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.64% 36.63% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 6748 6748
Lines 138813 138850 +37
Branches 39450 39478 +28
==========================================
Hits 50863 50863
- Misses 87950 87987 +37
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 1 file with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 5 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 5 Passed Test Services
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/module.tsx (3)
Line range hint
1-67
: Good use of TypeScript, consider exporting typesThe file makes good use of TypeScript, including typing the
signatureCollectionModule
asPortalModule
. To further improve type safety and reusability:
- Consider exporting any custom types or interfaces used in this module.
- If there are any props being passed to the lazy-loaded components, ensure they are properly typed.
Line range hint
1-67
: Excellent practices for tree-shaking and bundlingThe use of lazy loading for components and specific imports are excellent practices that facilitate effective tree-shaking and efficient bundling. To further optimize:
Consider using named exports instead of default exports for the lazy-loaded components. This can sometimes provide better tree-shaking opportunities.
Example:
const { SignatureListsParliamentary } = lazy(() => import('./screens/Parliamentary/'), )
Incomplete Route Name Refactoring Detected
The route name has been changed from 'Presidential' to 'Parliamentary' in
module.tsx
, but several instances of 'Presidential' remain in the codebase. Please ensure the following:
- Component Names: Update
SignatureListsPresidential
andViewListPresidential
to reflect the new route.- Import Paths: Adjust import statements to align with any renamed directories or files.
- Constants and Comments: Verify that all constants (e.g.,
'PresidentialLists'
) and comments are updated accordingly.- Related Functionality: Ensure that related components and functionalities are consistent with the name change to prevent potential bugs.
Analysis chain
Line range hint
40-45
: Verify consistency of route name changeThe route name has been changed from 'Presidential' to 'Parliamentary'. This change appears to be intentional, but please ensure that:
- This change is consistent throughout the file and the entire application.
- The
ViewListParliamentary
component is the correct component to render for this route.- Any related documentation or comments are updated to reflect this change.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to 'Presidential' in the file and related files # Test 1: Check for 'Presidential' in this file echo "Checking for 'Presidential' in module.tsx:" rg "Presidential" libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/module.tsx # Test 2: Check for 'Presidential' in related files echo "Checking for 'Presidential' in related files:" rg "Presidential" libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/Length of output: 2670
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/module.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/module.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (1)
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/module.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-67
: Good use of lazy loading and modular structureThe use of lazy loading for components and the modular structure with
PortalModule
andPortalRoute
are excellent practices that promote reusability across different NextJS apps. This approach allows for efficient code splitting and easier integration into various parts of the application or even different applications.
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit