Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(signature-collection): hide view list while active #16474

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

albinagu
Copy link
Member

@albinagu albinagu commented Oct 18, 2024

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the conditional rendering of the call-to-action button based on user permissions and list status.
    • Improved clarity for the cancellation dialog display for non-reviewed lists.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted logic to ensure the correct rendering of user interactions based on processing permissions.

@albinagu albinagu requested a review from a team as a code owner October 18, 2024 14:36
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the Constituency component within the index.tsx file. Key modifications include a restructured import statement for SignatureCollectionList and adjustments to the ActionCard component's logic, particularly in how the cta property is conditionally rendered based on the allowedToProcess flag and the list.active status. Additionally, the conditions for rendering the tag property within the ActionCard have been clarified, streamlining user interactions without altering the overall structure of the component.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx - Reformatted import statement to block import style.
- Updated ActionCard logic for conditional rendering of cta.
- Clarified conditions for rendering tag in ActionCard.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge, high priority

Suggested reviewers

  • alexdiljar
  • kksteini

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a0d459 and 60c3ab4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1)

145-160: Conditional rendering of cta is correctly implemented

The logic for the cta property effectively controls the rendering of the call-to-action button based on the allowedToProcess and list.active flags.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1972eb3 and 5a0d459.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1)

33-35: LGTM: Import statement refactored for better readability.

The change to a block import style for SignatureCollectionList improves code readability and follows common import conventions. It's a good practice to import from the API schema as it ensures type consistency across the application.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 311bd53 🔗

88 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 85 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 7 decreased, 7 increased, 186 no change

Test Services
This report shows up to 10 services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
air-discount-scheme-backend 0 0 0 81 0 31.74s N/A Link
air-discount-scheme-web 0 0 0 2 0 8.57s N/A Link
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.78s N/A Link
api-catalogue-services 0 0 0 23 0 11.78s N/A Link
api-domains-air-discount-scheme 0 0 0 6 0 18.98s N/A Link
api-domains-assets 0 0 0 3 0 11.95s N/A Link
api-domains-auth-admin 0 0 0 18 0 13.09s 1 no change Link
api-domains-communications 0 0 0 5 0 29.53s N/A Link
api-domains-criminal-record 0 0 0 5 0 8.96s N/A Link
api-domains-driving-license 0 0 0 23 0 29.28s N/A Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (7)

This report shows up to 5 code coverage decreases.

  • message-queue - jest 68.26% (-0.9%) - Details
  • judicial-system-api - jest 19.57% (-0.14%) - Details
  • judicial-system-message-handler - jest 51.46% (-0.1%) - Details
  • judicial-system-scheduler - jest 75.43% (-0.07%) - Details
  • judicial-system-message - jest 68.98% (-0.06%) - Details

@albinagu albinagu added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Oct 21, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.73%. Comparing base (de4f7a0) to head (60c3ab4).
Report is 20 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16474      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.75%   36.73%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        6835     6835              
  Lines      141332   141509     +177     
  Branches    40240    40295      +55     
==========================================
+ Hits        51949    51980      +31     
- Misses      89383    89529     +146     
Flag Coverage Δ
air-discount-scheme-backend 54.08% <ø> (ø)
air-discount-scheme-web 0.00% <ø> (ø)
api 3.37% <ø> (ø)
api-catalogue-services 77.85% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-assets 26.71% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-auth-admin 48.48% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-communications 39.90% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-criminal-record 48.00% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-driving-license 44.48% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
api-domains-education 31.58% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-health-insurance 34.77% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-mortgage-certificate 34.95% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-payment-schedule 41.16% <ø> (ø)
application-core 71.64% <ø> (+0.40%) ⬆️
application-templates-car-recycling 3.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-criminal-record 26.34% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-driving-license 18.32% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-estate 12.32% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-example-payment 25.14% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-financial-aid 15.50% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-marriage-conditions 15.17% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-mortgage-certificate 43.82% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-parental-leave 29.96% <ø> (ø)
application-types 6.63% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-components 1.28% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 21.37% <ø> (ø)
auth-admin-web 2.43% <ø> (ø)
auth-nest-tools 29.84% <ø> (ø)
auth-react 22.77% <ø> (ø)
auth-shared 75.00% <ø> (ø)
clients-charge-fjs-v2 24.11% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license 40.67% <ø> (ø)
clients-driving-license-book 43.80% <ø> (ø)
clients-license-client 1.83% <ø> (ø)
clients-middlewares 73.18% <ø> (+0.33%) ⬆️
clients-regulations 42.80% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-company-registry 29.76% <ø> (ø)
clients-rsk-personal-tax-return 38.00% <ø> (ø)
clients-smartsolutions 12.77% <ø> (ø)
clients-syslumenn 49.44% <ø> (ø)
clients-zendesk 54.61% <ø> (ø)
cms 0.42% <ø> (ø)
cms-translations 39.03% <ø> (ø)
content-search-index-manager 95.65% <ø> (ø)
content-search-toolkit 8.16% <ø> (ø)
contentful-apps 5.44% <ø> (ø)
dokobit-signing 63.38% <ø> (ø)
download-service 44.22% <ø> (ø)
feature-flags 91.11% <ø> (ø)
file-storage 53.71% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-backend 56.37% <ø> (ø)
icelandic-names-registry-backend 53.97% <ø> (ø)
infra-nest-server 48.17% <ø> (ø)
infra-tracing 43.24% <ø> (ø)
island-ui-core 28.39% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-api 18.37% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
judicial-system-audit-trail 69.35% <ø> (ø)
license-api 42.62% <ø> (-0.08%) ⬇️
localization 10.15% <ø> (ø)
message-queue 67.80% <ø> (ø)
nest-problem 45.85% <ø> (ø)
nest-sequelize 94.44% <ø> (ø)
nest-swagger 51.71% <ø> (ø)
regulations 16.78% <ø> (ø)
residence-history 85.00% <ø> (ø)
shared-problem 87.50% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 7 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update de4f7a0...60c3ab4. Read the comment docs.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 7c83ad4 into main Oct 21, 2024
23 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the sc_hide_info_lks branch October 21, 2024 10:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants