-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(portals-admin): Parliamentary collection #16142
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the signature collection functionality by introducing new message definitions for canceling signature collections and managing paper signatures. It also adds a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 12
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/identityAndCanSignLookup.graphql (1)
9-11
: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The
CanSign
query is well-structured and aligns with the coding guidelines. It promotes reusability and uses proper type definition. To enhance clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of thesignatureCollectionCanSignFromPaper
field.You could add a comment like this:
query CanSign($input: SignatureCollectionCanSignFromPaperInput!) { # Returns true if the signature collection can be signed from paper, false otherwise signatureCollectionCanSignFromPaper(input: $input) }libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx (2)
43-60
: LGTM: Breadcrumbs component improves navigationThe addition of the Breadcrumbs component enhances the user experience by providing clear navigation. The implementation is well-structured and uses localization correctly.
Consider extracting the Breadcrumbs items into a separate constant or function to improve readability and maintainability. For example:
const getBreadcrumbItems = (list) => [ { title: formatMessage('Yfirlit'), href: `/stjornbord${SignatureCollectionPaths.ParliamentaryRoot}`, }, { title: list.area.name, href: `/stjornbord${SignatureCollectionPaths.ParliamentaryConstituency.replace( ':constituencyName', list.area.name, )}`, }, { title: formatMessage(m.viewList) }, ] // Then in the JSX: <Breadcrumbs items={getBreadcrumbItems(list)} />This approach would make the component more readable and easier to maintain.
Line range hint
1-79
: LGTM: Overall component structure is well-maintainedThe List component's structure is well-preserved with the new additions integrated seamlessly. The use of Grid components for layout and consistent localization is commendable.
To improve TypeScript usage and make the component more robust, consider defining an interface for the component's props, even if it doesn't have any at the moment. This will make it easier to add props in the future if needed:
interface ListProps {} const List: React.FC<ListProps> = () => { // ... component implementation }This change aligns with the guideline of using TypeScript for defining props and exporting types, enhancing the component's reusability across different NextJS apps.
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/editPage.tsx (3)
24-26
: LGTM: Effective use of hooks for state management and localization.The component demonstrates good practices:
- Utilizes the
useLocale
hook for localization, promoting consistency across the application.- Implements state management using React's
useState
hook.Consider adding type annotations to the state variables for improved type safety:
const [newPage, setNewPage] = useState<number>(page) const [modalIsOpen, setModalIsOpen] = useState<boolean>(false)
28-86
: LGTM: Well-structured component with proper Modal implementation.The component structure and Modal implementation demonstrate good practices:
- Utilizes layout components from '@island.is/island-ui/core' for responsive design.
- Implements Modal functionality correctly with proper open/close logic.
- Form inputs are appropriately labeled and use localized messages.
- Correct implementation of editable and read-only inputs.
To improve accessibility, consider adding an
aria-label
to the edit icon:<Box marginLeft={1} onClick={() => setModalIsOpen(true)} cursor="pointer" aria-label={formatMessage(m.editPaperNumber)} > <Icon icon="pencil" type="outline" color="blue400" /> </Box>
90-90
: LGTM: Correct component export.The component is correctly exported as the default export, which is a common practice in React.
For better tree-shaking support, consider using a named export instead:
export const EditPage = ({ ... }) => { ... }This can potentially improve bundling efficiency, especially if this file might contain multiple exports in the future.
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/index.tsx (1)
44-53
: LGTM: Breadcrumbs component implemented correctlyThe
Breadcrumbs
component is well-implemented and enhances the navigation structure of the page. It adheres to the coding guidelines by:
- Supporting reusability across different NextJS apps.
- Using TypeScript for defining props (implicitly through the component usage).
- Integrating well with the existing code structure.
The use of
formatMessage
for the title supports localization, which is a good practice.Consider extracting the hardcoded string 'Yfirlit' into a message constant for better maintainability and consistency with other localized strings in the file. For example:
// In the messages file export const m = defineMessages({ // ... other messages overviewBreadcrumb: { id: 'portal.admin.signature-collection.overview-breadcrumb', defaultMessage: 'Yfirlit', }, }) // In the component title: formatMessage(m.overviewBreadcrumb),libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/index.tsx (1)
101-109
: Improved layout, but indentation needs adjustmentThe changes enhance the visual separation between the page number and the icon, which improves the overall layout. This is a good improvement to the user interface.
However, there's a minor issue with code formatting:
The indentation of the new
Box
component on line 103 is inconsistent with the surrounding code. Please adjust the indentation to match the parentBox
component. Here's the suggested change:<Box display="flex"> <Text>{s.pageNumber}</Text> - <Box marginLeft={1}> + <Box marginLeft={1}> <Icon icon="document" type="outline" color="blue400" /> </Box> </Box>This will maintain consistent indentation throughout the component, improving code readability.
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/index.tsx (2)
20-20
: LGTM! Consider grouping imports for better organization.The import of the
EditPage
component adheres to TypeScript usage guidelines and promotes reusability. To enhance code organization, consider grouping this import with other local component imports.import { pageSize } from '../../lib/utils' import { m } from '../../lib/messages' +import EditPage from './editPage' -import EditPage from './editPage'
125-129
: LGTM! Consider defining prop types for EditPage.The addition of the EditPage component enhances functionality and adheres to TypeScript usage guidelines. The conditional rendering and prop passing look good.
To improve type safety and documentation, consider defining prop types for the EditPage component:
type EditPageProps = { page: number; name: string; nationalId: string; }; const EditPage: React.FC<EditPageProps> = ({ page, name, nationalId }) => { // component implementation };This will provide better type checking and auto-completion when using the component.
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (3)
190-220
: LGTM! Consider adding descriptions for new messages.The new message definitions for canceling a collection are well-structured and consistent with the existing code. They are properly exported as part of the
m
object, which allows for effective tree-shaking.Consider adding meaningful descriptions to the new messages. This can improve maintainability and provide context for translators. For example:
cancelCollectionButton: { id: 'dmin-portal.signature-collection:cancelCollectionButton', defaultMessage: 'Hætta við söfnun meðmæla', - description: '', + description: 'Button text for canceling the signature collection', },
525-589
: LGTM! Consider adding descriptions and fix a typo.The new message definitions for handling paper signatures are well-structured and consistent with the existing code. They are properly exported as part of the
m
object, which allows for effective tree-shaking.
- Consider adding meaningful descriptions to the new messages. This can improve maintainability and provide context for translators. For example:
paperSigneesHeader: { id: 'admin-portal.signature-collection:paperSigneesHeader', defaultMessage: 'Skrá meðmæli af blaði', - description: '', + description: 'Header for the section to register paper-based signatures', },
- There's a typo in the
id
field forpaperSigneeCantSignMessage
. Please fix it:paperSigneeCantSignMessage: { - id: 'admin-portal.signature-collection:paperSigneeCantSign', + id: 'admin-portal.signature-collection:paperSigneeCantSignMessage', defaultMessage: 'Kennitala uppfyllir ekki skilyrði fyrir að skrá meðmæli', description: '', },
Line range hint
1-589
: LGTM! Consider standardizing naming conventions.The overall structure and implementation of the file are excellent. It promotes reusability, uses TypeScript effectively, and allows for efficient tree-shaking. The grouping of messages into different objects (
m
,parliamentaryMessages
, andcreateCollectionErrorMessages
) is a good practice for organizing related messages.For consistency, consider standardizing the naming convention for message groups. Currently, you have
m
,parliamentaryMessages
, andcreateCollectionErrorMessages
. It might be clearer to use a consistent suffix or prefix for all message groups. For example:export const generalMessages = defineMessages({ ... }) export const parliamentaryMessages = defineMessages({ ... }) export const createCollectionErrorMessages = defineMessages({ ... })This makes it immediately clear that all these exports are groups of messages.
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx (1)
25-25
: AdjustuseNamespaces
to accept an arrayThe
useNamespaces
hook typically accepts an array of namespace strings. Passing a single string might not be sufficient and could lead to unexpected behavior.Suggested Change:
- useNamespaces('sp.signatureCollection') + useNamespaces(['sp.signatureCollection'])libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1)
135-135
: Provide a more descriptiveariaLabel
for accessibilityThe
ariaLabel
is set to'delete'
, which may not be descriptive enough for assistive technologies. Consider providing a more detailed label.For example:
ariaLabel: formatMessage(m.cancelCollectionAriaLabel, { collectionTitle: list.title }),Add the message descriptor:
cancelCollectionAriaLabel: defineMessage({ id: 'sp.constituency.cancelCollectionAriaLabel', defaultMessage: 'Cancel collection {collectionTitle}', description: 'Aria label for the cancel collection dialog prompt', }),
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (11)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/navigation.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (4 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/identityAndCanSignLookup.graphql (1 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/uploadPaperSignee.graphql (1 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/editPage.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (11)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/navigation.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/identityAndCanSignLookup.graphql (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/uploadPaperSignee.graphql (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/index.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/editPage.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/index.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/index.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (12)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/uploadPaperSignee.graphql (1)
1-8
: Well-structured GraphQL mutation for paper signature uploadThis new GraphQL mutation is well-designed and adheres to best practices:
- The mutation name
SignatureCollectionUploadPaperSignature
is clear and descriptive.- It uses a single input parameter of type
SignatureCollectionUploadPaperSignatureInput
, which is good for maintainability and future extensibility.- The return value includes both a
success
flag andreasons
, facilitating robust error handling and user feedback.- The mutation is self-contained, which is beneficial for tree-shaking and bundling in the context of the larger application.
This implementation aligns well with the coding guidelines for the
libs
directory, particularly in terms of potential reusability across different NextJS apps dealing with parliamentary processes.libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/identityAndCanSignLookup.graphql (2)
1-7
: LGTM! Query adheres to guidelines and best practices.The
Identity
query is well-structured and follows GraphQL syntax. It uses proper type definition withIdentityInput
and returns relevant identity information. This query aligns with the coding guidelines by promoting reusability across different NextJS apps within the portals admin module.
1-11
: File adheres to coding guidelines and PR objectives.This GraphQL file successfully introduces two queries (
Identity
andCanSign
) that are reusable across different NextJS apps within the portals admin module. The use of TypeScript-like input types (IdentityInput
andSignatureCollectionCanSignFromPaperInput
) aligns with the coding guidelines. These queries effectively support the Parliamentary collection functionality mentioned in the PR objectives.libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/navigation.ts (1)
14-14
: LGTM! Consider verifying translation consistency.The change from
parliamentaryMessages.listTitle
toparliamentaryMessages.signatureListsTitle
appears to be a refinement of the navigation item label, likely making it more specific or accurate. This change adheres to the coding guidelines for files in thelibs
directory:
- It maintains the reusability of the navigation structure across different NextJS apps.
- It continues to use TypeScript effectively with imported types.
- The use of named imports supports effective tree-shaking.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:
This will help ensure that the change has been applied consistently and that the new translation key exists in the relevant files.
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx (2)
1-15
: LGTM: Import statements are correctly updatedThe new import statements for
Box
,Breadcrumbs
,PaperSignees
, andSignatureCollectionPaths
are correctly added and align with the new components and functionality introduced in this file.
69-69
: LGTM: PaperSignees component addedThe PaperSignees component is correctly integrated into the List component, using the listId prop. Its placement between Signees and ActionReviewComplete seems appropriate for the signature collection workflow.
To ensure the PaperSignees component is implemented correctly, could you provide more information about its functionality? Additionally, let's verify its implementation:
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/editPage.tsx (1)
1-23
: LGTM: Imports and component declaration adhere to guidelines.The imports and component declaration follow best practices:
- Appropriate UI components are imported from '@island.is/island-ui/core'.
- Localization is handled using '@island.is/localization'.
- TypeScript is used to define props, enhancing type safety.
- The component structure suggests reusability across different NextJS apps.
These aspects align well with the coding guidelines for files in the
libs
directory.libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/index.tsx (1)
9-9
: LGTM: Import statement updated correctlyThe addition of the
Breadcrumbs
component to the import statement is correct and consistent with the existing code style. This change supports the reusability of components across different NextJS apps, as per the coding guidelines.libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/index.tsx (3)
58-58
: Approved. Please clarify the design decision.The change from "white" to "blue" for the FilterInput background is noted. While this doesn't affect functionality, it would be helpful to understand the reasoning behind this design change. Was this requested by the design team or is it part of a larger UI update?
Line range hint
1-168
: Overall, the changes look good and adhere to the coding guidelines.The modifications in this file improve functionality while maintaining good coding practices. The changes adhere to the guidelines for libs/**/* files, including:
- Reusability of components (EditPage)
- TypeScript usage for prop passing
- Effective component structure for potential tree-shaking
To further improve the code:
- Consider grouping imports for better organization.
- Define prop types for the EditPage component to enhance type safety.
- Verify that the layout changes (removal of Box wrapper for Icon) don't negatively impact the UI.
These improvements will further enhance the code quality and maintainability of the component.
120-124
: LGTM! Verify layout impact.Removing the wrapping Box for the Icon component simplifies the structure, which is good. However, please ensure that this change doesn't negatively impact the layout or alignment of the icon within its parent container.
Run the following script to check for any other instances where this icon might be used:
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx (1)
137-138
: Ensure numeric input for thepage
fieldThe
page
input field should strictly accept numeric values to prevent invalid data submission.Verification Script:
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/editPage.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16142 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.69% 36.63% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 6776 6769 -7
Lines 139578 139359 -219
Branches 39678 39607 -71
==========================================
- Hits 51222 51060 -162
+ Misses 88356 88299 -57
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 64 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 3 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 3 Passed Test Services
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-presidential/AllLists/index.tsx (2)
128-128
: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The change from
m.signatureListsTitle
tom.signatureListsTitlePresidential
looks good and aligns with the purpose of making the title more specific to presidential signature lists. This update doesn't affect the component's reusability or impact tree-shaking and bundling practices.Consider adding a brief comment above this line to explain why a presidential-specific title is used here. This would improve code readability and maintainability. For example:
// Use presidential-specific title for this collection title={formatMessage(m.signatureListsTitlePresidential)}
Line range hint
1-385
: Consider refactoring for improved maintainability and performance.While the component generally follows good practices, there are a few areas where it could be improved:
The component is quite large and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused components for better maintainability.
Some of the state management and side effects could be optimized. For example, the
useEffect
hook that sets the candidates could be memoized to prevent unnecessary re-renders.The filtering logic could potentially be moved to a custom hook for better reusability and separation of concerns.
Here's a high-level suggestion for refactoring:
- Extract the filter logic into a custom hook, e.g.,
useListFilters
.- Create separate components for
ListHeader
,ListFilters
, andListItems
.- Use
useMemo
for expensive computations, like filtering lists.Example of a custom hook:
function useListFilters(allLists: SignatureCollectionList[]) { const [filters, setFilters] = useState<Filters>({ area: [], candidate: [], input: '', }); const filteredLists = useMemo(() => { // Your filtering logic here }, [allLists, filters]); return { filters, setFilters, filteredLists }; }This refactoring would improve the component's structure, making it more maintainable and potentially more performant.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-presidential/AllLists/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-presidential/AllLists/index.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx (2)
1-15
: Imports and component declaration look good.The imports and component declaration are well-structured and follow best practices. The use of TypeScript for prop definition is commendable.
Consider extracting the prop type to improve reusability:
type DownloadReportsProps = { areas: SignatureCollectionArea[] } export const DownloadReports = ({ areas }: DownloadReportsProps) => { // ... }
28-38
: Modal implementation is correct, but consider improving accessibility.The Modal component is well-implemented and properly localized. However, the
closeButtonLabel
prop is empty, which may impact accessibility.Consider adding a localized label for the close button:
closeButtonLabel={formatMessage(m.closeModalLabel)}Ensure that you add the corresponding message to your localization file.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (4 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/index.tsx (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/index.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Biome
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx
[error] 42-54: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx (1)
19-27
: Button implementation is correct and localized.The Button component is well-implemented, using the appropriate props from the UI library. The use of
formatMessage
for localization is correct.
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/PaperSignees.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-195
: Enhance compliance with coding guidelinesWhile the component generally adheres to the coding guidelines, consider the following improvements:
- Explicitly define prop types for the
PaperSignees
component using TypeScript interfaces or types.- Consider extracting some of the complex logic (e.g., national ID validation, paper signature upload) into custom hooks. This would enhance reusability across different NextJS apps and improve the overall structure of the component.
- Ensure that all exported types (if any) are properly defined and exported for use in other components or apps.
These changes will further align the component with the coding guidelines for libs/**/* files, improving reusability and type safety.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (4 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/PaperSignees.tsx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx
- libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/PaperSignees.tsx (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/PaperSignees.tsx (2)
124-124
: LGTM: Enhanced form validation for national IDAdding the
required
attribute to the national ID input field improves data integrity by ensuring this crucial information is always provided. This change aligns well with the component's purpose and enhances the overall user experience.
139-139
: LGTM: Consistent form validation for page numberAdding the
required
attribute to the page number input field is consistent with the national ID field change. This ensures that all necessary information is collected before form submission, improving data completeness and reliability.
* test * merge * merge tweaks * aftermerge-tweaks * tw * download reports * key * tweaks * format --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes