Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(income-plan): Incorrect monthly income when changing between montly and yearly income #15953

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

veronikasif
Copy link
Member

@veronikasif veronikasif commented Sep 11, 2024

[TS-903] Incorrect monthly income when changing between montly and yearly income

What

Specify what you're trying to achieve

Why

Specify why you need to achieve this

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the Income Plan Form to dynamically calculate and display monthly income based on user input.
    • Introduced a monitoring feature for the income field to improve responsiveness to user changes.
  • Future Enhancements

    • Added comments for potential future improvements related to form functionality.

@veronikasif veronikasif requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2024 10:04
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the IncomePlanForm component, specifically replacing the existing defaultValue logic with a new updateValueObj property. This property includes a valueModifier function that computes monthly income based on the incomePerYear field under certain conditions. The watchValues property is also set to monitor changes to the income field, enhancing the form's interactivity and responsiveness to user input.

Changes

Files Change Summary
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/income-plan/src/forms/IncomePlanForm.ts Replaced defaultValue logic with updateValueObj, which includes a valueModifier function and watchValues for the income field.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant IncomePlanForm
    participant ValueModifier

    User->>IncomePlanForm: Input incomePerYear
    IncomePlanForm->>ValueModifier: Call valueModifier with incomePerYear
    ValueModifier-->>IncomePlanForm: Return monthly income or undefined
    IncomePlanForm->>User: Update displayed income based on input
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/income-plan/src/forms/IncomePlanForm.ts (1)

182-184: Convert TODO to GitHub issue.

Consider converting this TODO comment to a GitHub issue for better tracking and visibility.

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 900c342 and 68d76ac.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/income-plan/src/forms/IncomePlanForm.ts (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/income-plan/src/forms/IncomePlanForm.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (2)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/income-plan/src/forms/IncomePlanForm.ts (2)

205-210: Verify if defaultValue can be removed.

The defaultValue logic seems redundant given the updateValueObj that is performing a similar calculation. Please verify if it can be safely removed.


213-226: Changes look good!

The new updateValueObj property should correctly calculate the monthly income based on the yearly income when the income type is RatioType.MONTHLY. The implementation adheres to the existing patterns and best practices.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.84%. Comparing base (c48134d) to head (b5da5c7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #15953   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.84%   36.84%           
=======================================
  Files        6718     6718           
  Lines      137708   137708           
  Branches    39148    39148           
=======================================
  Hits        50745    50745           
  Misses      86963    86963           
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.67% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 23.47% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 21.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c48134d...b5da5c7. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 478a44b 🔗

4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.25%), 10 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.56s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 111 2 2m 51.58s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 109 0 1m 42.98s 1 no change Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 32.16s 1 no change Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

  • application-templates-social-insurance-administration-income-plan - jest 30.25% (-0.25%) - Details

Copy link
Member

@ylfahfa ylfahfa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

beautiful 💯

@veronikasif veronikasif added the deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants