-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(old-age-pension): Change banner to warning and add link to income plan in pendingAction #16485
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16485 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.77% 36.77%
=======================================
Files 6844 6844
Lines 141684 141684
Branches 40358 40355 -3
=======================================
Hits 52107 52107
Misses 89577 89577
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/OldAgePensionTemplate.ts (1)
165-166
: Adherence to coding guidelines confirmed. Consider enhancing type safety.The changes adhere to the coding guidelines for
libs/**/*
files:
- TypeScript is used consistently.
- Existing structure supporting reusability across NextJS apps is maintained.
- No negative impact on tree-shaking or bundling practices.
To further improve type safety, consider defining an interface for the
statesMessages
object to ensure all required message keys are present.interface StatesMessages { oldAgePensionSubmittedContent: string; applicationApprovedDescription: string; applicationRejectedDescription: string; // Add other required message keys } const statesMessages: StatesMessages = { // ... message definitions };Also applies to: 301-301, 323-323
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/OldAgePensionTemplate.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/messages.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/OldAgePensionTemplate.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/messages.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (4)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/OldAgePensionTemplate.ts (3)
Line range hint
301-301
: LGTM! Verify the new approval message.The update to use
statesMessages.applicationApprovedDescription
for the approved state is consistent with the changes made earlier and should provide more specific information to users.Please confirm that the content of
statesMessages.applicationApprovedDescription
accurately conveys the intended message for approved applications.#!/bin/bash # Verify the content of the new approval message grep -rn "applicationApprovedDescription" .
Line range hint
323-323
: LGTM! Verify the new rejection message.The update to use
statesMessages.applicationRejectedDescription
for the rejected state is consistent with the previous changes and should provide more specific information to users about their rejected applications.Please ensure that the content of
statesMessages.applicationRejectedDescription
accurately conveys the intended message for rejected applications.#!/bin/bash # Verify the content of the new rejection message grep -rn "applicationRejectedDescription" .
165-166
: LGTM! Verify the new message content.The changes align well with the PR objectives. The switch to a more specific message (
statesMessages.oldAgePensionSubmittedContent
) and the change ofdisplayStatus
to 'warning' should improve user awareness.Please ensure that the content of
statesMessages.oldAgePensionSubmittedContent
accurately reflects the intended message for users at this stage of the application process.✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
TheoldAgePensionSubmittedContent
is correctly defined and aligns with the intended user messaging.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the content of the new message grep -rn "oldAgePensionSubmittedContent" .Length of output: 2069
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the content of the new message grep -rn "oldAgePensionSubmittedContent" .Length of output: 528
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the definition of 'oldAgePensionSubmittedContent' grep -A 5 "oldAgePensionSubmittedContent" ./libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/messages.tsLength of output: 653
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/messages.ts (1)
519-525
: LGTM! New message descriptor added for application submitted state.The new
oldAgePensionSubmittedContent
message descriptor provides clear and helpful information to users about their application status. It correctly informs them about the ability to edit the application and reminds them to submit an income plan if needed.Let's verify if this new message is used correctly in the application template:
✅ Verification successful
Usage of
oldAgePensionSubmittedContent
verified and correctly implemented in the application template.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of oldAgePensionSubmittedContent in the codebase rg -A 5 "oldAgePensionSubmittedContent" --type tsLength of output: 2092
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed Test Services
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
...
Attach a link to issue if relevant
What
Specify what you're trying to achieve
Why
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes