Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(old-age-pension): Change banner to warning and add link to income plan in pendingAction #16485

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

ylfahfa
Copy link
Member

@ylfahfa ylfahfa commented Oct 21, 2024

...

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

Specify what you're trying to achieve

Why

Specify why you need to achieve this

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced messaging for the old-age pension application process, providing clearer updates on application status.
    • New message descriptor added to inform users that their application is awaiting review and can be edited until then.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated content for pending actions in the application states to reflect more accurate descriptions.

@ylfahfa ylfahfa requested a review from a team as a code owner October 21, 2024 11:11
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the OldAgePensionTemplate.ts and messages.ts files within the old-age pension module. The updates in OldAgePensionTemplate.ts modify the state machine configuration, specifically the TRYGGINGASTOFNUN_SUBMITTED, APPROVED, and REJECTED states, focusing on the messaging for the pending actions. In messages.ts, a new message descriptor is added to enhance user communication regarding the application status. The overall structure of the state machine and existing messages remains unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/OldAgePensionTemplate.ts Updated TRYGGINGASTOFNUN_SUBMITTED, APPROVED, and REJECTED states with new pendingAction content and displayStatus.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/messages.ts Added new message oldAgePensionSubmittedContent to statesMessages for clearer application status communication.

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ylfahfa ylfahfa added the deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Oct 21, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.77%. Comparing base (5614a86) to head (ff57aed).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16485   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.77%   36.77%           
=======================================
  Files        6844     6844           
  Lines      141684   141684           
  Branches    40358    40355    -3     
=======================================
  Hits        52107    52107           
  Misses      89577    89577           
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.37% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.37% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 27.78% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
application-ui-shell 21.37% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...n/old-age-pension/src/lib/OldAgePensionTemplate.ts 15.15% <ø> (ø)
...administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/messages.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5614a86...ff57aed. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/OldAgePensionTemplate.ts (1)

165-166: Adherence to coding guidelines confirmed. Consider enhancing type safety.

The changes adhere to the coding guidelines for libs/**/* files:

  • TypeScript is used consistently.
  • Existing structure supporting reusability across NextJS apps is maintained.
  • No negative impact on tree-shaking or bundling practices.

To further improve type safety, consider defining an interface for the statesMessages object to ensure all required message keys are present.

interface StatesMessages {
  oldAgePensionSubmittedContent: string;
  applicationApprovedDescription: string;
  applicationRejectedDescription: string;
  // Add other required message keys
}

const statesMessages: StatesMessages = {
  // ... message definitions
};

Also applies to: 301-301, 323-323

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5614a86 and ff57aed.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/OldAgePensionTemplate.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/messages.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/OldAgePensionTemplate.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/messages.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (4)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/OldAgePensionTemplate.ts (3)

Line range hint 301-301: LGTM! Verify the new approval message.

The update to use statesMessages.applicationApprovedDescription for the approved state is consistent with the changes made earlier and should provide more specific information to users.

Please confirm that the content of statesMessages.applicationApprovedDescription accurately conveys the intended message for approved applications.

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the content of the new approval message
grep -rn "applicationApprovedDescription" .

Line range hint 323-323: LGTM! Verify the new rejection message.

The update to use statesMessages.applicationRejectedDescription for the rejected state is consistent with the previous changes and should provide more specific information to users about their rejected applications.

Please ensure that the content of statesMessages.applicationRejectedDescription accurately conveys the intended message for rejected applications.

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the content of the new rejection message
grep -rn "applicationRejectedDescription" .

165-166: LGTM! Verify the new message content.

The changes align well with the PR objectives. The switch to a more specific message (statesMessages.oldAgePensionSubmittedContent) and the change of displayStatus to 'warning' should improve user awareness.

Please ensure that the content of statesMessages.oldAgePensionSubmittedContent accurately reflects the intended message for users at this stage of the application process.

✅ Verification successful

Verification Successful
The oldAgePensionSubmittedContent is correctly defined and aligns with the intended user messaging.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the content of the new message
grep -rn "oldAgePensionSubmittedContent" .

Length of output: 2069


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the content of the new message
grep -rn "oldAgePensionSubmittedContent" .

Length of output: 528


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the definition of 'oldAgePensionSubmittedContent'
grep -A 5 "oldAgePensionSubmittedContent" ./libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/messages.ts

Length of output: 653

libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/messages.ts (1)

519-525: LGTM! New message descriptor added for application submitted state.

The new oldAgePensionSubmittedContent message descriptor provides clear and helpful information to users about their application status. It correctly informs them about the ability to edit the application and reminds them to submit an income plan if needed.

Let's verify if this new message is used correctly in the application template:

✅ Verification successful

Usage of oldAgePensionSubmittedContent verified and correctly implemented in the application template.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the usage of oldAgePensionSubmittedContent in the codebase
rg -A 5 "oldAgePensionSubmittedContent" --type ts

Length of output: 2092

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

All test runs 88129c9 🔗

4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 8 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.65s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 120 2 3m 32.84s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 123 0 2m 21.45s 1 no change Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 31.72s 1 no change Link

Copy link
Member

@birkirkristmunds birkirkristmunds left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants