Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2023. It is now read-only.

Sprint: Aug 15 → Aug 22 #141

Closed
RichardLitt opened this issue Aug 11, 2016 · 20 comments
Closed

Sprint: Aug 15 → Aug 22 #141

RichardLitt opened this issue Aug 11, 2016 · 20 comments

Comments

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Member

RichardLitt commented Aug 11, 2016

Sprint August 15th

For information about these calls and how they work, read the ipfs/pm README.

Calendar

Endeavour Lead Time (PDT - UTC/Z - CEST) Pad
All Hands Call @RichardLitt 9:00PDT 16:00Z 18:00CEST all-hands-call
go-ipfs @whyrusleeping 10:00PDT 17:00Z 19:00CEST pad-go-ipfs
js-ipfs @diasdavid 10:30PDT 17:30Z 19:30CEST pad-js-ipfs
libp2p @diasdavid 11:00PDT 18:00Z 20:00CEST pad-libp2p

We also inserted a discussion about http-api.

Please add any agenda items you have to the pad before the project-specific sprint call starts.

Please post below if you would like to have any calls after the All Hands Call.

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

We need to talk about the HTTP-API -> https://github.com/ipfs/http-api-spec/issues/114

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Member Author

@flyingzumwalt Should I add that as a call, now?

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Member Author

@diasdavid Do you want to put it on the all-hands agenda, schedule a call for it, or cover it on the js-ipfs call?

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

@RichardLitt Can you describe what is going to happen tomorrow? It seems that no hangouts are schedule other than a All Hands.

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Member Author

I'm a bit new to this new format; I thought that we arrange the meetings during the call before hand. @flyingzumwalt can you help me here?

@flyingzumwalt
Copy link
Contributor

I think the main sprint calls (in the sprint issue template) - js-IPFS, go-IPFS and libp2p - are always included by default. We just add agenda items to the all-hands and add/remove project-specific sprint calls like IPLD based on requests over the week.

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Member Author

@diasdavid Added them. :)

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

We also need to decide if we still want the config replace, by ipfs/kubo#2927 . @whyrusleeping @Kubuxu probably we can have this one in go-ipfs.

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

Thank you @RichardLitt <3

I've added an agenda to js-ipfs and libp2p. Please, everyone, also add items to the agendas that you would like to see discussed.

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

daviddias commented Aug 15, 2016

js-ipfs AI from the call

http-api AI from the call

libp2p AI from the call

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Member Author

Is there a need for the ####, or the multiple comments? :P

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

@RichardLitt :D

@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Aug 15, 2016

I like it because it's super attention grabbing :)

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Member Author

I know you like it. :) But it also grabs the attention of everyone else, which can be very distracting.

@flyingzumwalt
Copy link
Contributor

WHY ARE YOU SHOUTING AT ME.

@daviddias daviddias reopened this Aug 16, 2016
@daviddias
Copy link
Member

@flyingzumwalt Can we continue to keep the issue open during the sprint?

@flyingzumwalt
Copy link
Contributor

I don't see why not. Seems like people use it to post little updates and to
find meeting notes.

Maybe we can close the previous week's issue when the following week's call
happens?

On Tuesday, August 16, 2016, David Dias [email protected] wrote:

@flyingzumwalt https://github.com/flyingzumwalt Can we continue to keep
the issue open during the sprint?


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#141 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIestJl8o02SLD0KDc_GQlSMBetTqocks5qgWXwgaJpZM4JigX8
.

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

@flyingzumwalt that is what we've been doing and I believe it is a good formula (I come back to sprint issue often) :)

@flyingzumwalt
Copy link
Contributor

Oh I closed it! Lol. I didn't mean to close it. I must have hit the wrong button when I added a comment. Sorry.

@RichardLitt
Copy link
Member Author

I was wondering about that!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants