Enumerate the tests in order to make sure that execa is as robust as subcommandante

[daviddias]

As discussed in August 15 js-ipfs sprint meeting. @jbenet please enumerate all the tests you would like to see for: #89

//cc @JGAntunes

[jbenet]

@diasdavid no sorry I don't have time for this in the next 2 weeks. If you
want me to this it probably won't get done for a while.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 17:00 David Dias [email protected] wrote:

Assigned #95 #95 to @jbenet
https://github.com/jbenet.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#95 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIcoW4vFe9u4AfL4xneNWF3011-jCDZks5qgNN7gaJpZM4JkxEZ
.

[jbenet]

The burden of proof also lies on whoever wants to change the behavior.
Its up to that PR to ensure correctness
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 21:24 Juan Benet [email protected] wrote:

@diasdavid no sorry I don't have time for this in the next 2 weeks. If you
want me to this it probably won't get done for a while.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 17:00 David Dias [email protected] wrote:

Assigned #95 #95 to @jbenet
https://github.com/jbenet.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#95 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIcoW4vFe9u4AfL4xneNWF3011-jCDZks5qgNN7gaJpZM4JkxEZ
.

[daviddias]

Ok, I'll handle this myself with @JGAntunes

[dignifiedquire]

I found out the hard way that it isn't :(

[daviddias]

Could you elaborate?

[daviddias]

Nvm, saw the commits on #140 (comment), closing this one then :)