Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear/struct #1226

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Clear/struct #1226

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

pawanrawal
Copy link
Contributor

@pawanrawal pawanrawal commented Jul 21, 2017

  1. Clear out the struct given by user in Unmarshal. This is consistent with how json.Unmarshal behaves. This fixes error updating an edge value (delete/set) in same request #1216.
  2. Also added helper functions to delete a Node and Edge from the client.

This change is Reviewable

@ashwin95r
Copy link
Contributor

Review status: 0 of 3 files reviewed at latest revision, 3 unresolved discussions.


client/client.go, line 199 at r1 (raw file):

		e.nq.SubjectVar = n.String()
	} else {
		e.nq.Subject = n.String()

What if both Subject and SubjectVar are 0? what would we set for e.nq.Subject? We should make sure the node is valid before sending to server.


client/unmarshal.go, line 216 at r1 (raw file):

	for i := 0; i < v.NumField(); i++ {
		f := v.Field(i)
		ft := t.Field(i)

Should we also check that this is accessible?


client/unmarshal.go, line 222 at r1 (raw file):

		switch ft.Type.Kind() {
		case reflect.Slice:
			f.Set(reflect.MakeSlice(ft.Type, 0, 0))

Is there a way to just set it to [:0] instead of allocating again?
f.Slice(0, 0)
https://golang.org/pkg/reflect/#Value.Slice


Comments from Reviewable

@janardhan1993
Copy link
Contributor

Review status: 0 of 3 files reviewed at latest revision, 3 unresolved discussions.


client/unmarshal.go, line 222 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, ashwin95r (Ashwin Ramesh) wrote…

Is there a way to just set it to [:0] instead of allocating again?
f.Slice(0, 0)
https://golang.org/pkg/reflect/#Value.Slice

https://github.com/golang/go/blob/master/src/encoding/json/decode.go#L578
Have a look at jon unmarshal, we need to handle other types like array


Comments from Reviewable

@pawanrawal
Copy link
Contributor Author

Review status: 0 of 9 files reviewed at latest revision, 3 unresolved discussions.


client/client.go, line 199 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, ashwin95r (Ashwin Ramesh) wrote…

What if both Subject and SubjectVar are 0? what would we set for e.nq.Subject? We should make sure the node is valid before sending to server.

handling that in validate now.


client/unmarshal.go, line 216 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, ashwin95r (Ashwin Ramesh) wrote…

Should we also check that this is accessible?

At this moment we are sure that v is of type struct and t is the type of struct so it should be ok to iterate over v.NumField and access t.Field(i)


client/unmarshal.go, line 222 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, janardhan1993 (Janardhan Reddy) wrote…

https://github.com/golang/go/blob/master/src/encoding/json/decode.go#L578
Have a look at jon unmarshal, we need to handle other types like array

f.Slice doesn't work. JSON.Unmarshal also uses MakeSlice.
I don't think we need to support Array for now, I throw an error. They can just a slice. No one has asked for it too.


Comments from Reviewable

@ashwin95r
Copy link
Contributor

:lgtm:


Review status: 0 of 9 files reviewed at latest revision, 2 unresolved discussions.


client/unmarshal.go, line 216 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, pawanrawal (Pawan Rawal) wrote…

At this moment we are sure that v is of type struct and t is the type of struct so it should be ok to iterate over v.NumField and access t.Field(i)

Why not just i < v.NumField() && i < t.NumField() ?


Comments from Reviewable

@janardhan1993
Copy link
Contributor

:lgtm:


Reviewed 9 of 9 files at r2.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 2 unresolved discussions.


Comments from Reviewable

@pawanrawal
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged

@pawanrawal pawanrawal closed this Jul 25, 2017
@pawanrawal pawanrawal deleted the clear/struct branch July 26, 2017 06:34
jarifibrahim pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2020
Important changes
```
 - Changes to overlap check in compaction.
 - Remove 'this entry should've been caught' log.
 - Changes to write stalling on levels 0 and 1.
 - Compression is disabled by default in Badger.
 - Bloom filter caching in a separate ristretto cache.
 - Compression/Encryption in background.
 - Disable cache by default in badger.
```

The following new changes are being added from badger
`git log ab4352b00a17...91c31ebe8c22`

```
91c31eb Disable cache by default (#1257)
eaf64c0 Add separate cache for bloom filters (#1260)
1bcbefc Add BypassDirLock option (#1243)
c6c1e5e Add support for watching nil prefix in subscribe API (#1246)
b13b927 Compress/Encrypt Blocks in the background (#1227)
bdb2b13 fix changelog for v2.0.2 (#1244)
8dbc982 Add Dkron to README (#1241)
3d95b94 Remove coveralls from Travis Build(#1219)
5b4c0a6 Fix ValueThreshold for in-memory mode (#1235)
617ed7c Initialize vlog before starting compactions in db.Open (#1226)
e908818 Update CHANGELOG for Badger 2.0.2 release. (#1230)
bce069c Fix int overflow for 32bit (#1216)
e029e93 Remove ExampleDB_Subscribe Test (#1214)
8734e3a Add missing package to README for badger.NewEntry (#1223)
78d405a Replace t.Fatal with require.NoError in tests (#1213)
c51748e Fix flaky TestPageBufferReader2 test (#1210)
eee1602 Change else-if statements to idiomatic switch statements. (#1207)
3e25d77 Rework concurrency semantics of valueLog.maxFid (#1184) (#1187)
4676ca9 Add support for caching bloomfilters (#1204)
c3333a5 Disable compression and set ZSTD Compression Level to 1 (#1191)
0acb3f6 Fix L0/L1 stall test (#1201)
7e5a956 Support disabling the cache completely. (#1183) (#1185)
82381ac Update ristretto to version  8f368f2 (#1195)
3747be5 Improve write stalling on level 0 and 1
5870b7b Run all tests on CI (#1189)
01a00cb Add Jaegar to list of projects (#1192)
9d6512b Use fastRand instead of locked-rand in skiplist (#1173)
2698bfc Avoid sync in inmemory mode (#1190)
2a90c66 Remove the 'this entry should've caught' log from value.go (#1170)
0a06173 Fix checkOverlap in compaction (#1166)
0f2e629 Fix windows build (#1177)
03af216 Fix commit sha for WithInMemory in CHANGELOG. (#1172)
23a73cd Update CHANGELOG for v2.0.1 release. (#1181)
465f28a Cast sz to uint32 to fix compilation on 32 bit (#1175)
ea01d38 Rename option builder from WithInmemory to WithInMemory. (#1169)
df99253 Remove ErrGCInMemoryMode in CHANGELOG. (#1171)
8dfdd6d Adding changes for 2.0.1 so far (#1168)
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

error updating an edge value (delete/set) in same request
3 participants