added link to f.lux webpage

[IvxLars]

To help people that does not know f.lux already

Proposed change

To help people that does not know f.lux already, a link to the webpage of f.lux has been added

Type of change

• Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
• [x ] Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
• Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • I've opened up a PR to add logo's and icons in Brands repository.
• Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
• Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

• Link to parent pull request in the codebase:
• Link to parent pull request in the Brands repository:
• This PR fixes or closes issue: none

Checklist

• [ x] This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
  • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
  • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
• [ x] The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

[frenck]

This might be confusing since this integration has absolutely nothing to do with the software offered on the linked page.

[IvxLars]

The intro states, " similar to the way flux works on your computer", so I figured I would add a link to help people read about what it actually does. The software is different, but the principle is described.

[frenck]

So, maybe we should describe the principle ourselves?

[IvxLars]

But this version is a copy of a hue plugin, which is directly saying it is an implementation of f.lux, why not give credits to the original inventor of the f.lux software?

[frenck]

This is not giving credit, this is sending people to another software package for context. Those are two different things, and the initial concern I raised. (So back at square 1)

[IvxLars]

Okay, i was trying to help by expanding with a link to the original software and explanation which this plugin is inspired by, but you can just reject the PR, and I will find elsewhere to contribute.

[klaasnicolaas]

Think that the key question is, why is there a flux integration without a connection with the flux software. Is it actually correct that it bears the name flux? Or would it be better to integrate this integration in terms of features with an emerging integration that has the same functions? Like #14877

[frenck]

Okay, i was trying to help by expanding with a link to the original software and explanation which this plugin is inspired by, but you can just reject the PR, and I will find elsewhere to contribute.

It has nothing to do with that software. That is the whole point.

As you wish, closing.