Add cover platform to Dynalite

[ziv1234]

Breaking change

Not a breaking change

Proposed change

Adding the cover platform to Dynalite. This is reimplemented from #32511 because I did something wrong with the rebase

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Example entry for configuration.yaml:

# Example configuration.yaml
bridges:
    - host: 10.0.0.200
      port: 95
      autodiscover: false
      polltimer: 1
      active: off
      # log_level: debug
      area:
        '9':
          name: Office
          channel:
            '1': 
              name: Center
            '2': 
              name: East
              fade: 2
            '3': 
              name: West
        '10':
          name: Cinema
          template: room
          channel:
            '1':
              name: Spot
            '2':
              name: Wall
            '3':
              name: Wall Plug
        '108':
          name: Office Blind
          template: timecover
          tilt: 3
          duration: 75

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
• This PR is related to issue:
• Link to documentation pull request: Add cover to Dynalite integration home-assistant.io#12275

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist
• The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:

• No score or internal
• 🥈 Silver
• 🥇 Gold
• 🏆 Platinum

[ziv1234]

just checking in now that 107 is out. Is there something I should do to get a review or should I just wait? This is a very minor fix in code (adding cover.py) but also has some refactoring of the tests to remove redundant code.
In any case, no rush. Just wanted to know if it is waiting on anything on my end

[MartinHjelmare]

Good!

[ziv1234]

Thanks! For some reason there are tests failing in the CI that don't seem related (dyson component, the next one in alphabetical order...). Could this be related to the PR? They all pass in my venv

[MartinHjelmare]

I don't see any dyson tests failing, just tts and they are expected currently.

[ziv1234]

thanks! Maybe i got mixed up with something. appreciate everything
wanted to ask you about something else that i wanted to add to dynalite, but not sure it follows the home assistant way (per your comments earlier) so thought i would check with you before submitting a PR
the structure of the dynalite system that has to be in configuration.yaml is almost always tightly aligned with the setup of the house. For example, every room will be an area, with presets for on/off and channels for the different lights. This means that the dynalite integration can also easily assign HA areas according to this and it will make the setup much easier since it was already done once. This can be done via the UI, but it involves a lot of manual work.
Is this something that makes sense to add? the code is very simple, but given your questions about the templates, here this is purely a convenience issue. I must say that when i did it home (custom component so far, until the covers are part of the normal release), it is very convenient for a large setup like mine.
Let me know. if interesting, it is a few lines of code that i can submit quickly

[MartinHjelmare]

I'm not sure. Ask in the discord dev chat or architecture issue.

[ziv1234]

thanks. I will make the PR at some point in any case, so it can be reviewed. already have the code so now just copy/paste...