-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds types to FetchService #45
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
38447cb
Adds types to FetchService
jeffdaley 62ef4ad
Merge branch 'main' into jeffdaley/type-fetch-service
jeffdaley 17a5681
Merge branch 'main' into jeffdaley/type-fetch-service
jeffdaley 5b7b07e
Update maybeUndefined
jeffdaley e78c4d5
Merge branch 'main' into jeffdaley/type-fetch-service
jeffdaley 887b717
Add fetch to tsconfig
jeffdaley 5712506
Fix type errors
jeffdaley a3c87f3
Merge branch 'main' into jeffdaley/type-fetch-service
jeffdaley fffd34b
Merge branch 'jeffdaley/fetch' into jeffdaley/type-fetch-service
jeffdaley b0e88ce
Update people-select.ts
jeffdaley 27c8ff0
Merge branch 'main' into jeffdaley/type-fetch-service
jeffdaley 618b121
Remove unnecessary import
jeffdaley 349ab95
Merge branch 'main' into jeffdaley/type-fetch-service
jeffdaley File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm curious about the uses of
assert
in this PR because assertions are removed for production builds - can you explain the intent behind these?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To pass type checking and hopefully to pinpoint errors better in development.
resp
can be undefined so we have to assert it or invoke it with a question markresp?.json()
. I expect a response so I opted to assert it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thinking about this a little more. I see where you're coming from. It's both more succinct and more true to use the
resp?.json()
invocation. Any benefit of assertion-error proximity is minimal. I'm going to change the approach!