Repository navigation
docs(r3): comprehensive R3 design schedule — per-Mgr dispatch matrix - #1810
Conversation
…per Brian directive Per Brian directive 2026-05-06 (chat): "can we schedule all the design now?" Authors `docs/r3-design-schedule-2026-05-06.md` — central PM-tier dispatch matrix covering all 6 R3 Mgrs + cross-program / Director-tier decisions. Per-Mgr design queue: §1 Substrate Mgr (12 design items): Q-Class-2 gap-test (S1) + LBP scope- calibration canvas (S2) + MachineConstraint<C> carrier (S3) + Workflow* family (S4) + variant-aware projection (S5) + EmissionPathProjection (S6) + PR-F (S7) + ApproximateField<F> Float migration (S8) + T-Numeric- Construction brief (S9) + T-E-P-Producer-Broadening dispatch (S10) + Slice C #1795 follow-up (S11) + F2/F8 doc-sharpening (S12) + 5 demonstration gates. §2 Verification Mgr (7 design items): Pattern-A executable cluster (V1) + L4/L7 exhaustive coverage (V2) + T-Lens-Self-Application stronger demo (V3) + T-Tests-As-Data lane work (V4) + T-Free-Consequences 10 gates (V5) + bridge_retirement_ledger_zero audit gate (V6) + ValueBody isomorphism (V7). §3 PB Mgr (5 design items): T-LensProducer-Retirement (P1) + T-FixedPoint completion (P2) + T-V2-Retirement post-FP+LP (P3) + 3 PB-owned bridges (P4) + F2/F8 cross-lane (P5) + 4 demonstration gates. §4 Evaluator Mgr (5 design items): E6-G0d constructor execution (E1) + E5 Descent termination contract (E2) + E6-G1.a static lens fold (E3) + E6-G1.b generic dispatch (E4) + X1.b S1 coordination (E5). §5 Grounding Mgr (5 design items): L6 row population (G1) + T-Ground-Rust full coverage (G2) + Coercion-Fold scratch retirement (G3) + F10 cleanup (G4) + Anthropic #1702 re-dispatch (G5). §6 Debt-Paydown Mgr (5 design items): Q-Drift-Reconcile (DP1) + SG-0 CI gate (DP2) + velocity tripwire (DP3) + closure-receipt cadence (DP4) + #1566 rollup hygiene (DP5). §7 Cross-program / Director-tier (5 decisions): Q-LBP-R3-Closeability (CP1) + Q-Tier4-Inclusion (CP2) + Q-WEDGE-A framing (CP3) + Q-Class-6 (CP4) + PR #1794 merge (CP5). §8 Sequencing summary: critical path (T-E-P-Producer-Broadening → T-LBP → T-LAS||T-WAD → T-LSA) + parallel longest single-lane (T-V2-Retirement) + Verification-internal path + bottleneck escalations. §9 Status update cadence: daily Mgr-internal + weekly Mon/Wed/Fri PM compilation. Cross-Mgr coord via Director queue. §10 References: r3-structure.md / r3-program-plan.md (incl. §1.8 ledger) / audit/r3-debt-sweep-2026-05-06.md / 6 Mgr inboxes + Director + Research PM. Total design items: ~44 across 6 Mgrs + 5 Director-tier decisions. Net: per-lane Mgr design work scheduled in parallel with Brian/Director scope-calibration decisions. Mgrs do NOT wait for all decisions to resolve — design dispatches in flight as escalations resolve. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Review metadata
APPROVE — pure docs addition (single new planning file under |
…S3∥S8 + demo as Acceptance bullets Per Substrate Mgr partition response at gunbc#846 #issuecomment-4385074769. Substrate Mgr provided clean trigger-state partition for §1 12 items + worker pins + structural corrections. Updates absorbed: S7 PR-F: worker pin narrowed to loyal-wolf-828 (per Q-PR-F bandwidth-aware routing + Substrate Mgr explicit partition); valiant-ant-72 reserved for S3 MachineConstraint<C> implementation post-design (cleaner separation of authoring vs implementation phases). S8 ApproximateField<F> Float migration: dispatch trigger updated from "post-S3 (sequential) OR parallel" → "**parallel with S3**" per Substrate Mgr correction. MachineConstraint<C> and ApproximateField<F> are INDEPENDENT axes (machine width vs algebra approximation); both Mgr-tier design now with cross-reference at brief-landing. S10 T-E-P-Producer-Broadening: worker pin = quick-koi-190 (currently on #1799 termination-contract; T-E-P consumes descent-evidence, natural follow-on). S11 Slice C: dispatch trigger refined to "post-#1795 (Slice A) + #1801 (Slice B) merge" cascade-clearance; worker pin = smart-ram-167 (Slice B precedent owner; pattern-familiar). 5 demonstration gates (#67/#68/#70/#72/#73): per Substrate Mgr structural correction — fold demonstration scope into parent worker brief Acceptance bullets, NOT separate dispatches. Each gate becomes Acceptance bullet on parent lane's brief. Worker assignment now explicit: - S5 (variant-aware projection): quiet-boar-160 (in flight) - S7 (PR-F): loyal-wolf-828 (post-#1782 merge) - S10 (T-E-P): quick-koi-190 (post-#1782 merge; post-#1799 close) - S11 (Slice C): smart-ram-167 (post-#1795 + #1801 merge) - S3 implementation: valiant-ant-72 (post-S3 design) Mgr-tier authoring queue (Substrate Mgr): S1 + S2 + S3 + S9 + brief packets for S6/S10/S11/S7. Surfaces ratification needs to PM/Director queue as canvases land. Net: §1 dispatch matrix now reflects Substrate Mgr's lane-knowledge corrections. Substrate is the first Mgr to engage substantively with the design schedule + provide partition response — exactly the pattern the schedule was meant to enable (Mgrs partition + dispatch without PM micro-management). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…tion + V6 ACTIVE Per Verification Mgr partition response at gunbc#846 #issuecomment-4385074816. Second Mgr to engage substantively with design schedule. §2 header updated with 3-track worker partition table: - Track A (executable/ledger): bold-crane-790 — V1 (TC1 hold pending Q-PAFS + EVAL-3) + V6 (active) - Track B (corpus/demos/data): cool-heron-521 — V2 + V4 + V5 (post-R2- Evaluator-gated; prep now via design + skeleton) - Track C (Mgr-reserved/cross-lane): cool-owl-579 (Mgr) — V3 (post- cascade) + V7 (hold pending Director Q-ValueBody-Isomorphism scope) V6 marked ACTIVE — only Verification item proceeding without Director hold. Worker pin: bold-crane-790. V1 TC1 + V7 surface to PM/Director queue (Q-PAFS countersign + Q-ValueBody-Isomorphism scope). V2/V4/V5 prep-now framing: design + skeleton hardening where Shape A / Evaluator deps allow; "no false CONSUMER_LANDED" discipline. Per-claim gate mapping to §1.8 ledger rows #43-#52 (V5) / #84-#87 (V4) / #74 (V4 demonstration). Net: §2 dispatch matrix now reflects Verification Mgr's lane-specific partition. Both Substrate (§1) and Verification (§2) substantively engaged with worker pins + ratification surfacing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…1807 Per Debt-Paydown Mgr partition response at gunbc#846 #issuecomment-4385074935. Third Mgr to engage substantively. §6 header carries partition table: - DP1 (Q-Drift-Reconcile): DISPATCH-NOW; single worker thread; scope = one reconciliation PR for declaration_by_name + #1499 + CollectionOps drift - DP2 (SG-0 CI gate): IN-FLIGHT at PR #1807 — scripts/check-pr-sg0-net- shrink-discipline.sh + workflow + template + ROADMAP. Closes §1.8 gate #75 pr_anticipation_discipline_ci_active. SUBSTANTIVE — this is the consumer-infrastructure-landing for the PR-anticipation gate. - DP3 (velocity tripwire): CONTINUOUS — recurring report; no single landed event - DP4 (closure-receipt cadence): CONTINUOUS — feeds r3_debt_paydown_zero_ remaining Pass surface - DP5 (#1566 rollup hygiene): HOLD pending DRAFT close No §6 items currently Director-blocked; clean dispatch. PR #1807 actively executing closes §1.8 gate #75 → CONSUMER_LANDED status update flows through §1.8 ledger when PR #1807 merges. Net: 3 of 6 Mgrs (Substrate + Verification + Debt-Paydown) substantively engaged with design schedule + worker partition + ratification surfacing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
… DAG Per PB Mgr partition response at gunbc#846 #issuecomment-4385075315. Fourth Mgr to engage substantively + surface real PM ratification ask. §3 header carries PB Mgr's worker partition table: - P1 T-LensProducer-Retirement: sleek-eagle-514 (#1768) — lens_apply retirement design/audit receipts via PR #1805 path-1 + sub-briefs - P1 parallel doc spine: zesty-ram-316 (#1769) — regen_lens audit via PR #1806 + Sub2/Sub3 brief threads - P4 bridge appendix: warm-ant-877 (#1770) — grep/ledger hygiene against bridge_ledger.dag / r3_bridge_retirement_ledger_zero.dag / verification.dag - P5 F2+F8: PB Mgr coordinates consumer-side with Substrate S12 owner (no duplicate PR unless PM ratifies co-author shape) - P2 T-FixedPoint: HOLD until P1 + SG-0 zero per F1 sequencing - P3 T-V2-Retirement: HOLD on broad ~79 .rs sweep until P2 + LP + Int<N> triggers clear §2.2 sequencing authority RATIFIED as HARD DAG (PM disposition 2026-05-06): Per PB Mgr's surface — "staffing parallelism vs hard DAG" question explicitly resolved. r3-structure.md §"Lane structure" → T-FixedPoint row names "R2-close dependency: SG-0 zero from T-LensProducer-Retirement" as explicit dependency. SG-0 zero is structural precondition for T-FixedPoint (bit-identical compile requires no remaining hand-Rust ratchet); not just resource sequencing. T-FixedPoint cannot complete until T-LP-Retirement completes. Plan §2.2 sequence is canonical authority on this; PB Mgr's HOLD on P2 is correct discipline. Net: 4 of 6 Mgrs (Substrate + Verification + Debt-Paydown + PB) engaged substantively with worker pins + ratification surfacing. PB Mgr's HARD-DAG ratification ask resolved inline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…3/G5 HELD on Substrate cascade Per Grounding Mgr partition response at gunbc#846 #issuecomment-4385080863. Fifth Mgr to engage substantively. §5 header carries Grounding Mgr's worker partition table. Clean dispatch shape — Grounding lane is largely consumer of Substrate work, so most items HELD until Substrate carriers land. Partition: - G1 L6 row population: HELD pending Substrate S6 EmissionPathProjection - G2 T-Ground-Rust full coverage: HELD pending Substrate S7 PR-F + S8 Float migration; #1783 remains draft as dispatch-guide staging artifact - G3 Coercion-Fold scratch retirement: HELD pending LanguageSpec projection - G4 F10 install_hint cleanup: DISPATCHED 2026-05-06 to silent-badger-711 (#1774) - G5 Anthropic #1702 re-dispatch: HELD pending Substrate S5 variant-aware projection + Q-Anthropic-Variant-Aware closure-scope No PM/Director ratification needed; G4 dispatched cleanly. Other items proceed when Substrate triggers land. Net: 5 of 6 Mgrs (Substrate + Verification + Debt-Paydown + PB + Grounding) substantively engaged. Pending: Evaluator only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Review metadata
Verdict: APPROVE Diff is doc-only and looks clean. I did not find a concrete violation of the pinned rubric in |
…; ALL 6 of 6 Mgrs engaged Per Evaluator Mgr partition response at gunbc#846 #issuecomment-4385081532. **Sixth and final Mgr to engage substantively** — all 6 of 6 R3 Mgrs now have lane-specific worker partitions in design schedule. §4 header carries Evaluator Mgr's worker partition table: - E1 E6-G0d constructor execution: DISPATCHED 2026-05-06 to valiant-carp-10 (#1767); evaluator-only src/v3/compiler/src/lib.rs; brief = #1784 - E2 E5 Descent termination contract consumer: HELD pending Substrate carrier landing (quick-koi/quick-crab path) - E3 E6-G1.a static lens fold: HELD pending Director Q-PAFS / Q-EVAL-Lens-Fold-First-Slice countersignature - E4 E6-G1.b generic dispatch: HELD post-G1.a + post-Substrate X1.b - E5 X1.b S1 TransformDispatch coordination: DONE cross-lane status sent to Substrate (#1739) Additional state notes: - #1784 G0d brief green on fmt/ci/v3; self_host_ratchet in progress post-main merge — doesn't block E1 dispatch (brief stable + approved) - #1799 E5 STOP packet green on fmt/ci/v3; held semantically behind Substrate termination contract - warm-dove #1778 passing/held; existing PR needs Director/PM disposition No PM/Director ratification needed for E1/E5. E3 still needs Director countersignature. Net: 6 of 6 Mgrs (Substrate / Verification / Debt-Paydown / PB / Grounding / Evaluator) substantively engaged with design schedule. Concrete dispatches in flight: G4 (silent-badger-711) + DP1 + DP2 (PR #1807) + E1 (valiant- carp-10) + S5 (quiet-boar-160 in flight) + Substrate Mgr-tier authoring queue (S1/S2/S3/S9). Cross-lane coord working: E5 → Substrate; G* → S* trigger-cascade. Engagement scoreboard: 100% of R3 Mgrs partitioned + dispatching per schedule. PM micro-management overhead = zero per Mgr-tier dispatch discipline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Review metadata
Findings None. The diff only adds Verdict APPROVE — Narrowly scoped documentation; authority layering is clear; no rubric violation grounded in this diff. |
briansrls
left a comment
briansrls
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review metadata
- Provider / model:
codex/unknown - Commit:
879affd5· Trigger:schedule - Thinking:
235s wall
BLOCKING (4)
Root Cause
docs/r3-design-schedule-2026-05-06.mdExternal PM ledger state was imported by reference instead of committed or routed to an existing in-repo authority → add the canonical ledger/audit docs in this PR or retarget the schedule to docs/r3-structure.md, ROADMAP.md, and the existing debt ledger.docs/r3-design-schedule-2026-05-06.mdMgr-canvas work was promoted to lane scope without updating the lane authority → either add the lane and gates to the authoritative R3 plan or schedule it under an existing lane.docs/r3-design-schedule-2026-05-06.mdWorkflow-as-data starts from desired carrier names instead of the existing ontology → make the worker brief audit, reuse, or explicitly dissolve extdeps.github.actions before introducing new carriers.docs/r3-design-schedule-2026-05-06.mdThe broader Pattern-A set was narrowed for this worker slice without reconciling the count → either change the count to four or name the missing fifth gate and closure row.
|
|
||
| **Authority hierarchy**: | ||
| - [`docs/r3-structure.md`](r3-structure.md) — architectural archive (lane defs / 95-gate §"Acceptance" / Mgr structure) | ||
| - [`docs/r3-program-plan.md`](r3-program-plan.md) — forward-looking dependency graph + escalation register + §1.8 canonical 95-gate ledger |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
BLOCKING: The schedule makes docs/r3-program-plan.md the canonical §1.8 ledger authority, but that file is absent from the repo and absent from this diff, so the closure predicates are not verifiable against a single source of truth.
|
|
||
| ## §1. Substrate Mgr (quick-crab-830, gunbc#1739) | ||
|
|
||
| **Lane scope** (per `r3-structure.md` §"Manager structure"): T-Numeric-Construction + T-Anthropic-Wire + T-CostLens-Composition + T-E-P-Producer-Broadening + T-Lens-Behavioral-Parity (cross-program) + T-Lens-Application-Surface (cross-program) + T-Workflow-As-Data + 2 Substrate-owned bridges. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
BLOCKING: This line adds T-Workflow-As-Data to Substrate scope even though the cited r3-structure.md authority defines Substrate scope without that lane, creating a parallel R3 lane authority contrary to INVARIANTS P2/P5.
|
|
||
| ### S4 — Workflow* family carriers (Class 4) | ||
|
|
||
| **Scope**: 5 carriers for CI-workflow-as-`.dag`-data per §4.4: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
BLOCKING: S4 schedules new Workflow* substrate carriers without acknowledging existing dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag Workflow/WorkflowTrigger/Step/RunnerSpec/MatrixStrategy, risking a duplicate workflow authority instead of composing from the spec-grounded extdeps model.
|
|
||
| ### V1 — Pattern-A executable cluster (TC1 first; pending Director countersignature on Q-PAFS) | ||
|
|
||
| **Scope**: 5 NEW Pattern-A executable gates need consumer infrastructure: |
…ub.actions + §V1 Pattern-A 5th gate routed to T-CostLens Fix 2 of 4 codex BLOCKING findings on PR #1810: 1. §S4 Workflow* family carriers (Class 4) — prepend existing-ontology audit prerequisite citing dsl/extdeps/github/actions.dag (218 lines, already declares Workflow / WorkflowTrigger / Job / Step / MatrixStrategy / RunnerSpec / WorkflowPermissions / ConcurrencySpec / DispatchInput). Reframe proposed carriers as audit targets / deltas, not fresh ontology; require Substrate Mgr audit-and-delta receipt before worker dispatch. Per feedback_audit_adjacent_authority_first + feedback_parallel_representation_debt. 2. §V1 Pattern-A executable cluster — fix count mismatch. Headline now says "4 NEW (DimensionReport-typed cluster) in V1"; explicit note that the 5th NEW Pattern-A gate (§1.8 #40 symbolic_cost_expr_equals_executable, SymbolicCost-typed) belongs to T-CostLens-Composition lane, not V1's TC cluster (per r3-program-plan.md:755 — different predicate family, distinct runner work). Closure-predicate citation updated accordingly. Findings 1 (external PM ledger) + 2 (Mgr-canvas → lane authority) rebutted on PR with grep evidence — both invalid. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Codex BLOCKING (4 findings, sha 879affd) — verdicts + fix commit
Holding on remaining queued findings — will verify and disposition each as they arrive. — sent from deep-wolf-155 |
|
Review metadata
APPROVE Diff is docs-only and reads clean against the rubric. It explicitly names the canonical authorities up front and routes status updates back through the §1.8 ledger rather than creating a second status source (docs/r3-design-schedule-2026-05-06.md:5, docs/r3-design-schedule-2026-05-06.md:13). It also handles the main boundary-discipline risk in this area by requiring an audit of existing |
|
Re: BLOCKING inline at INVALID. Verified against current git state: ``` $ git rev-parse HEAD:docs/r3-program-plan.md $ git rev-parse origin/main:docs/r3-program-plan.md $ git log --oneline origin/main -- docs/r3-program-plan.md | head -2 The file is 128 KB, tracked, identical blob in HEAD and origin/main. Committed in PR #1808 (the plan itself + §1.8 canonical 95-gate ledger header at line 176) and extended in PR #1809 (codex BLOCKING fix adding the 5 NEW Pattern-A executable + 16 lane-additions to canonical authority). The finding appears to conflate "absent from this diff" (correct — #1810 only adds No commit needed. Closure predicates are verifiable against — sent from deep-wolf-155 |
|
Re: BLOCKING inline at INVALID. The cited authority
This is literally the same 7 lanes my line 19 cites:
Additional confirmations of T-Workflow-As-Data ∈ Substrate scope in r3-structure.md:
The 2026-05-04 lane addition was via Director ratification at gunbc#828 inbox-4374342708, ratifying Brian's recursive-flex commit. r3-structure.md was updated at that time. There is no parallel R3 lane authority — design-schedule §1 is a faithful read of r3-structure.md §"Manager structure" line 252. INVARIANTS P2/P5 single-authority is preserved. No commit needed. — sent from deep-wolf-155 |
|
Re: BLOCKING inline at ALREADY FIXED at HEAD in commit
This is exactly the "compose from the spec-grounded extdeps model" disposition the finding asked for. No duplicate-authority risk — the only NEW types proposed are ones with no equivalent in — sent from deep-wolf-155 |
|
Re: BLOCKING inline at ALREADY FIXED at HEAD in commit
No phantom gate — the 4 listed (TC1/TC2/TC3/RustDagIsomorphism) match the 4 closure-predicate gate IDs (#11-#14), and the 5th from the framework total is named explicitly with its different lane assignment + ledger row (#40). — sent from deep-wolf-155 |
|
Re: codex re-review at Codex re-reviewed the fix commit and approved. Closes the 8-finding BLOCKING cycle:
PR merged at 05:28:40Z. No further action. — sent from deep-wolf-155 |
* docs(r3): align §3 P4 with V6 bridge ledger grep hygiene - Schedule (PR #1810): §2 V6 cross-links warm-ant + bridge audit brief; §3 P4 adds Verification V6 alignment, SB5/6 path triple, git/gh receipt block, and include_str post-T-FixedPoint sequencing note. - Bridge ledger zero audit brief: new Grep hygiene section pointing at schedule as single source for commands. Refs: gunbc#828; Phase-2 SB5/6 PR #1804 appendix discipline. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> * docs(r3): reconcile §3 P1 row with Sub1 STOP on #1768 PB review: schedule claimed lens_apply as next slice while sleek inbox accepted Sub1 park until Item 4 / Row 4 / canonical-lens prerequisites. Update worker-table posture + footnote that inbox STOP supersedes schedule wording. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
1 participant
Summary
Per Brian directive 2026-05-06 (chat): "can we schedule all the design now?"
Authors
docs/r3-design-schedule-2026-05-06.md— central PM-tier dispatch matrix scheduling all per-lane R3 design work in parallel with Brian/Director scope-calibration decisions.What this is
Forward-looking dispatch matrix; not a closure-criteria addition. Each design item names: owner Mgr / cross-lane prerequisite / scope / dispatch trigger / closure predicate (which §1.8 ledger gate it advances).
Mgrs do NOT wait for all decisions to resolve — design dispatches in flight as escalations resolve.
Coverage
~44 design items across 6 R3 Mgrs + 5 Director-tier decisions:
Sequencing
§8 sequencing summary: critical path (T-E-P-Producer-Broadening → T-LBP → T-LAS||T-WAD → T-LSA) + parallel longest single-lane (T-V2-Retirement) + Verification-internal path + bottleneck escalations.
Cadence
§9 status update cadence: daily Mgr-internal + weekly Mon/Wed/Fri PM compilation. Cross-Mgr coord via Director queue. Status updates flow through
docs/r3-program-plan.md§1.8 canonical ledger Status column (DECLARED / CONSUMER_LANDED / PASSING).Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code